Re: ping
[email protected] ("David Grove") Mon, 30 Oct 2000 09:22:27
| Newsgroups | perl.sdk |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jonathan Scott Duff <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 12:55:25AM -0600, Jacob Kenner wrote: > > I would still like to see an sDK happen. I spend way too much time > > trying to gather all the major packages together and install them on > > each new machine. A simple grouping of the major packages would free up > > time for a lot of people. > > You're always free to make your own bundle that has all of the modules > that you normally install. > > Maybe someone should just do that as an interim step towards the SDK. This is basically what I do with PerlMagic. Although some people don't like the file's download size (I could chop it up), most Win32 people find it a tremendous benefit over utilities like VPM/PPM (ActiveState) and CPAN (everybody but Win32), the former of which works once in a while, and the latter can be quite annoying if you don't WANT to upgrade your _entire_ perl system (some of the newest Linux distros are shipping with 5.005 and avoiding 5.6). This is also how I keep track of what modules people use ("call it market research"). I think you'd be amazed at some of the ancient modules that people insist on, and some of the new ones that people have little use (or tolerance, it seems) for. > > I am pretty sure that we would all rather be > > making things, teaching and learning, than spending time installing perl > > modules. > > Indeed. > > -Scott > -- > Jonathan Scott Duff > [email protected] >