Re: Branches, Patches and Bugs, was Re: SDL_Perl-2.1.3 Build.PL bug

RT bugs go to me anyways :)

I am swampped with work.

Please be patient, I'll get to it eventually.

Dave

On 3/1/06, Tels <[email protected]> wrote:
> Moin,
>
> On Tuesday 21 February 2006 19:19, chromatic wrote:
> > On Monday 20 February 2006 11:27, Chris Hinrichs wrote:
> > (That reminds me, we really ought to merge the three separate branches
> > soon.)
>
> What three branches!?
>
> Currently I found a memory leak in SDL Perl (while reviving my own
> SDL::App::FPS work) and want to send in a patch (plus patches for other
> issues like doc, and slowness).
>
> At first I considered sending it here. But I could also send it directly
> to David, or to http://rt.cpan.org. Where should it really go? And
> against what version, the only one I know if is on CPAN (where it should
> be).
>
> Seeing that the Changes file in 2.1.3 is garbled (either no longer
> updated, or the dates are wrong, as the last entry is from 2004!), and
> the bug list on rt.cpan.org is stale (there are one year old bugs that
> are marked open, but *seem* to be patched from the comments), I am really
> unsure what the best place is to get my patches to the end-users as fast
> as possible.
>
> This guessing is all very time consuming and frustrating for me, and I
> guess other possible contributors have the same feeling (like TONYC, who
> reported a bunch of bugs with patches 7 weeks ago on RT, and they seem to
> be ignored).
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Tels
>
>
> --
>  Signed on Wed Mar  1 18:44:49 2006 with key 0x93B84C15.
>  Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/
>  PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email.
>
>  "The rovers Spirit and Opportunity were proposed, authorized, announced,
>  designed, launched and successfully landed upon Mars within the
>  timeframe of Duke Nukem Forever's development." - Unknown
>
>
>
>


--
"The universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment
an incredible miracle"

-Stapp's Ironical Paradox