Re: Branches, Patches and Bugs

[email protected] (Ed Halley)
Newsgroups perl.sdl.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
What with all this talk about merging, I would still like to see the 
"official" x.y numbering scheme match that of SDL itself, instead of a 
completely different "rewrite two" numbering scheme which bears no 
relation to the library it's trying to bind.

Tels wrote:
> Moin David,
> 
> On Sunday 05 March 2006 15:36, David Goehrig wrote:
> 
>>Tels when you checkout of the repository you create your own Local
>>branch. When you've finished testing and verified that your code is
>>right, check it in to the main tree.
>>
>>When a release is made, for sanity sake, I will import the release as
>>another branch.  All development should happen in the main tree with
>>bug fixes resulting in new branches forking off that tree as a bug
>>fix.
> 
> 
> I think somebody else should first merge the other branches first into 
> yours.
> 
> In addition, I have no experience with svn or cvs whatsoever, except 
> checking code out.
> 
> So I'd rather have someone else review my patches before they go into a 
> repository. :)
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> Tels
> 

-- 
[ e d @ h a l l e y . c c ]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.