Re: Branches, Patches and Bugs
[email protected] (Ed Halley)
| Newsgroups | perl.sdl.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
What with all this talk about merging, I would still like to see the "official" x.y numbering scheme match that of SDL itself, instead of a completely different "rewrite two" numbering scheme which bears no relation to the library it's trying to bind. Tels wrote: > Moin David, > > On Sunday 05 March 2006 15:36, David Goehrig wrote: > >>Tels when you checkout of the repository you create your own Local >>branch. When you've finished testing and verified that your code is >>right, check it in to the main tree. >> >>When a release is made, for sanity sake, I will import the release as >>another branch. All development should happen in the main tree with >>bug fixes resulting in new branches forking off that tree as a bug >>fix. > > > I think somebody else should first merge the other branches first into > yours. > > In addition, I have no experience with svn or cvs whatsoever, except > checking code out. > > So I'd rather have someone else review my patches before they go into a > repository. :) > > Best wishes, > > Tels > -- [ e d @ h a l l e y . c c ]