Re: Branches, Patches and Bugs

Moin,

On Sunday 05 March 2006 18:54, Ed Halley wrote:
> What with all this talk about merging, I would still like to see the
> "official" x.y numbering scheme match that of SDL itself, instead of a
> completely different "rewrite two" numbering scheme which bears no
> relation to the library it's trying to bind.

I have to say that the version numbers are our least concern atm.

At least for CPAN it is not possible to use a lower version now, anyway.

best wishes,

tels

-- 
 Signed on Sun Mar  5 20:51:39 2006 with key 0x93B84C15.
 Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/
 PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email.

 "Most of the screen on a blog is blank for an imaginary populace of
 readers still using 640x480 resolution. I didn't buy a 19" monitor to
 have 50% of its screen realestate pissed away on firing white pixels,
 you assholes." -- maddox from xmission

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUARAtBeHcLPEOTuEwVAQFHiQf6AlbDJ2y127o2TgWxdO2uurB9EW7E7qJm
4vLlTaYMfOKnolx6UQmBCjRyQtBXEig9qLGk7X2FpvJZ70a6tYMDSjSxKWtfSbVe
1TdoelcCYaxPHetUW4OxMigP3Xv1v0uzKWnny+TVlq0YuZEDxJV5cCgKoupgNUG6
lbJFqBfqG0m0RwAbtnoHC4uiQWCh7R3kdGo6BU6KIBABNm2C/j5r2Ccbbw4nKd3r
cbPmRcZLIC9Yt8oQFOAVL14v0DcOkEDTVToT/JyECQi/ZIDz1ufBrCEjvqOHIQtA
hJUjWC9alSEOdL0ozw249zyuvKRNZXoX9CPhEEp2BAUl1cAJ0JKPZA==
=EL+Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----