Re: Frozen Bubble 2.201 is out

[email protected] (Guillaume Cottenceau)
Newsgroups perl.sdl.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>> You've chosen your own
>> numbering (2.201) and to keep the original name, so for
>> outside/distribution people it looks like just a normal upgrade (I
>> already got that echo from Mandriva).
>
> We call it Games::FrozenBubble too close?

I think so, yes. "Games" for people has just no meaning since it looks
like a categorizing part. And "FrozenBubble" is exactly the same name
except the - separator in the middle of the original name. That said,
I cannot suggest a very good name change and it also would imply some
graphics changes. So I'd favor a bold explanation on your releases.


>> If there are any problems with
>> your releases in stable distributions, I would not like to be
>> associated with these problems, and for that I'd appreciate a naming
>> change, I think "ported to CPAN" is probably not enough. I think the
>> most simple would be to not do releases, leaving me some (reasonable
>> amount of) time so that we try to agree on a common codebase and
>> acceptable planning for the future.
>
> We can hold back on releases for sure. That is not too hard to do :).

Great. Can you already add a bold statement in current release stating
it's not (yet) an official upgrade to original Frozen-Bubble game?


>> By reasonable time, I can offer a
>> serious review of your branch this week already and then some more
>> work if needed in the following weeks.
>
> No worries take as much time as you need.

Thanks - but it would not be fair to your work to take a lot of time,
so I'll try to act this week already.


>> By acceptable planning, I think
>> that everything which you'd plan to do which wouldn't hurt our
>> original view of the game (including its stability for example) would
>> be totally fine (for example, your refactoring plans); since we didn't
>> plan many more developments and it's open source, it's normal others
>> people could improve the software if they want to do; however, my only
>> limit would be if you chose to implement things I'm strongly against
>> to see in FB, then I'd ask for a name change.
>
> We haven't made any logic changes in FB at all. Just porting.
> We could later fix bugs but there is no game play changes in mind.

Ok.

Thanks,

-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://zarb.org/~gc/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.