RE: Tcl::Tk Compatibility Updates for Perl/Tk

> I haven't heard from you in a while and was wondering were you were at
> in reviewing and/or incorporating the changes I made to Tcl::Tk for
> perl/tk compatibility?

Hi,

indeed, I was planning with gathering your pieces, but eventually forgot about the problem, sorry.
Right now I am in vacation trip till 13th of  may w/o Internet.

> If you don't think the changes fit your planned direction for the
> Tcl::Tk package, I was thinking that another option for the changes is
> to be released as a separate package (something like a new Tcl::pTk
> package )
> 
> What do you think?

I really like this solution - because it was my blue dream and real preference to have Tcl::Tk module really small - essentially one single PM file.

But your solution has an unfortunate problem, though.
Having yet another perl+tk solution will make people confused.
They will not know what to select between Tkx, perl/Tk, Tcl::Tk and Tcl::pTk.

But if users of this mailing list will see this as no-problem, I will greatly support this, and even will help you with some eventual patches of your new module.

Sorry me once again, I really appreciate your effort, although I can not show you the code to support this my statement :)

Best regards,
Vadim.