RE: Tcl::Tk Compatibility Updates for Perl/Tk

> From: Jan Dubois [mailto:[email protected]] 
> FWIW, I agree with all the points here.  I too would prefer 
> that Tcl::Tk
> becomes as much as possible a Perl/Tk drop-in replacement.  But since
> Vadim disagrees, I don't think there are many options left beyond
> forking Tcl::Tk to another namespace. :(

I do not disagree... 
I also agree with all raised points, but I really like for the forrest of additional files to be optional.

But I really think that reasonable compromise is perfectly possible

> The obvious namespace for a new/extended/incompatible implementation
> for Tk would be Tkx, but that is already taken...  It is not clear to
> me that the new name has to be under the Tcl:: namespace; a top level
> namespace might still be appropriate.  Maybe Tk2::, similar to
> Apache:: and Apache2::.

I like Tk2 
:)

Regards,
Vadim.