Re: Possible Ideas for Presentation
[email protected] (John Porter)
| Newsgroups | perl.trainers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Nathan Torkington wrote: > > Oh man, I have started a monster! For the sake of historical > accuracy, the full truth (discovered by someone else after I wrote the > story up) is that Perl wasn't actually supposed to have been allowed > in the first place. The competition was preparation for the ACM, > which doesn't permit Perl, so instead of Perl being banned the > following year, the rules were merely more accurately stated. Well then, why is Perl banned in the ACM competition? Is it not because Perl is "Too Good"? -- John Porter "There are people who have fun studying the C++ spec for literally seconds on end, I'm sure..." John Vlissides