Re: Possible Ideas for Presentation
[email protected] (John Porter)
| Newsgroups | perl.trainers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Joseph N. Hall wrote: > No, it's because the ACM competition is about solving problems > constructively, not using built-in language features. Uh huh. So I guess only machine language is permitted. > Using > Perl is like entering a moped in the Boston marathon. Dubious analogy. I think what's really going on is, the problems posed are designed -- perhaps not intentionally -- to be challenging when attacked with certain low-level languages. This is legitimate, of course. But in a world with approachable and widely deployed high-level languages like Perl, one wonders how relevant such a contest is. And I wonder which, if any, other languages have been similarly banned. -- John Porter "There are people who have fun studying the C++ spec for literally seconds on end, I'm sure..." John Vlissides