Re: Perl Training Directory

In article <[email protected]>, 
[email protected] (Elaine -Hfb- Ashton) wrote:

> Gabor Szabo [[email protected]] quoth:
> *>
> *>I can do this but I am a bit worried that it is too unscientific. I could
> *>even add a way to add comments but that could make even more problems.

> Well, trainer feedback would be almost exclusively subjective, not
> objective so there's no way around that really. Maybe trainers could
> submit their course evaluation results or something?

that will never happen, and you couldn't trust it anyway.  

> This is why I said
> 'proven' has no meaning in this context as this isn't scientific material

'proven' means just what it means when i said it - to determine the
truth of a statement.  there are plenty of people who claim to be
Perl programmers or trainers who don't use or teach Perl.  some
of them even write books about Perl.

you gone too far towards the corporate side of things.  i wasn't
using buzzwords.  i was speaking English.

> and you can simply say 'comes highly recommended' or somesuch and add a
> few nice comments/feedback from actual students. 

anyone can find a few nice comments, so they are hardly useful.
-- 
brian d foy <[email protected]> - Perl services for hire
CGI Meta FAQ - http://www.perl.org/CGI_MetaFAQ.html
Troubleshooting CGI scripts - http://www.perl.org/troubleshooting_CGI.html