RE: Open Perl Exercises, anyone ?
[email protected] ("Stephen Collyer") Tue, 25 Jun 2002 10:25:12 +0100
| Newsgroups | perl.trainers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Scott [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:30 PM > To: [email protected]; Perl Trainers > Subject: Re: Open Perl Exercises, anyone ? > The biggest disadvantage I see is in the prerequisites. Particularly > in the more elementary classes, an exercise solution is likely to > include something that hasn't been taught by that stage of a particular > presenter's class. It's not really practical to give an exercise and > say, "By the way, for this exercise you'll need to know the substr(), > index(), and reverse() functions, none of which I considered important > enough to have taught by this stage." And you won't get consensus from > trainers about whether they should have taught the "while (<>)" > construct by the time they get to hashes, for example. See my response to Tom Phoenix that covers this point. In brief: 1. Lots of exercises (maybe with multiple solutions). 2. Trainer chooses the right set for the course. 3. Problem solved. Steve Collyer