Re: 2nd-Best Perl Publisher?
[email protected] (Danny Faught) Sat, 14 Dec 2002 08:22:45 -0600
| Newsgroups | perl.trainers |
|---|---|
| Organization | Tejas Software Consulting |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Clinton A. Pierce wrote: > I'll second the Scott Meyers/SAMS notion. They're a fairly easy > publisher to write for, a good book will earn a fair sum, and Scott has > his head screwed on straight. I did a pre-publication review for "Software Testing" by Ron Patton and published by Sams. The editing was really top-notch, and that's not something I see very often. I didn't like the fact he referenced very little of the existing literature, though - I don't recall whether Sams insisted on this or not, since it targets a beginning audience. There were several references to other books from Sams that were marginally relevant, though there's a vast wealth of highly relevant literature from other publishers. -- Danny Faught (former Books Guide editor for StickyMinds.com) Tejas Software Consulting http://www.tejasconsulting.com