Re: Hands-on?
[email protected] ((Randal L. Schwartz))
| Newsgroups | perl.trainers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "William" == William R Ward <[email protected]> writes: William> There is never a slide for the tangent that you drift off William> into as a result of a student's question, etc. I prefer the William> freedom afforded by a white board, where I do all the William> material by hand. That'd probably work fine for 1-5 students, but there's no way to keep on track, week after week, for 15 students, with that method. As Nat said, it's good to have both canned stuff and a way to digress. I know *my* students would suffer if I had to handwrite all the stuff we do in the llama course week after week. For one, they'd never be able to read any of my handwriting at the end of the day. :) I know that when I write something on the board, the next 45 seconds of student attention is on COPYING the stuff on the board, not listening to me. So I've just lost 45 seconds of valuable class time. If I talk during that 45 seconds, I almost always have to repeat it because someone wasn't listening. If I don't talk (like sometimes I hum the theme from Jepoardy), I bore the people that aren't making notes. :) And then there's the "when can I erase" question... since some people take notes only when they've decided that what I've written is interesting enough... so if I want to go on to the next thing, I have to wait until I get a response to "everyone got this -- I'm gonna erase" question. So William, do you just present 1/3 as fast then (time to write, time to copy, time to talk)? Actually curious now. :) -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <[email protected]> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!