Re: Perl 5.12.2-RC1 is now available
[email protected] ("Craig A. Berry") Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:18:54 -0500
| Newsgroups | perl.vmsperl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sep 1, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Vorländer, Martin wrote: > MUCH better: > > Failed 37 tests out of 1611, 97.70% okay. Thanks for the report. I downloaded the tarball and built a default configuration and got: All tests successful. u=67.65 s=0.00 cu=0.00 cs=0.00 scripts=1631 tests=327531 Note that I ran 1631 test scripts and you only ran 1611, so there must be some feature (possibly symlinks?) that I have but you don't. > ../cpan/Archive-Extract/t/01_Archive-Extract.t > ../cpan/CPANPLUS-Dist-Build/t/02_CPANPLUS-Dist-Build.t <snip> > ../cpan/ExtUtils-MakeMaker/t/basic.t <snip> > ../cpan/Module-Build/t/PL_files.t <snip> > ../cpan/Time-HiRes/t/HiRes.t > ../dist/ExtUtils-Install/t/Install.t <snip> All of these groups probably fail as a group, and probably because they aren't finding something they want. Sometimes a PATH definition can be the problem. Hard to say without details. > ../lib/perl5db.t This is testing the debugger. It might get confused by a logical name like TT, or TTY or TERM or something. > ../lib/vmsish.t This tends to have trouble for people on the plus side of UTC time. > op/stat.t > porting/manifest.t No idea. > u=53.58 s=0.00 cu=0.00 cs=0.00 scripts=1611 tests=316018 > > Anything I should look into immediately? If you have time to look into the vmsish.t failure, that might be something we should sort out. ________________________________________ Craig A. Berry mailto:[email protected] "... getting out of a sonnet is much more difficult than getting in." Brad Leithauser