Re: utils/perldoc.Com vs utils/perldoc
[email protected] ("Craig A. Berry") Fri, 20 Sep 2013 20:05:01 -0500
| Newsgroups | perl.vmsperl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sep 20, 2013, at 6:01 PM, John E. Malmberg = <[email protected]> wrote: > After all, if you are going to always use Perl to invoke it, why add = the hack to make it work as a command file? Because you may not use Perl to invoke it. You may invoke it with DCL = which will then invoke Perl. You can invoke it by putting it in the = command tables, or by setting up a foreign command, or by placing it in = a directory listed in DCL$PATH. Any and all of which can make "perldoc" = run perl_root:[utils]perldoc.com as a command procedure (which then = re-runs itself using Perl). That's about as close to having a shebang = line as you're going to get on VMS. > And even more curious, why add a hack to make look like it should work = as a command file with out actually making it work? Seems to be working just fine and as designed. ________________________________________ Craig A. Berry mailto:[email protected] "... getting out of a sonnet is much more difficult than getting in." Brad Leithauser