Fwd: Strawberry Perl capabilities?

[email protected] (Gabor Szabo)
Newsgroups perl.win32.vanilla
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Forwarded from the Perl Beginners list.

It would be nice if this and in general the question "How does
Strawberry compare to ActivePerl?" was addressed in a FAQ on the
Strawberry web-site.


Gabor

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Christensen <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 2:39 AM
Subject: Strawberry Perl capabilities?
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>


Shlomi Fish wrote:
>
> Actually, Strawberry Perl is preferable over AS Perl:
> http://strawberryperl.com/

From memory, AS makes (commercial) Perl tools for creating stand-alone
Windows executables and single-file Windows Installer packages.  I
also recall a Perl .NET toolchain.  Does Strawberry Perl have any of
these capabilities?  Must Strawberry Perl be installed first on
end-users' machines?


It's my understanding that Strawberry Perl provides a C compiler and a
working CPAN environment.  This is well and good for pure Perl
applications, but I also write Perl software that drives GNU
command-line tools (ssh, tar, gzip, rsync, etc.) and/or is driven by
other GNU tools and/or Apache.  I have found Win32 binaries for some
of the pieces, but only Cygwin seems to have everything I need.  How
does a Strawberry Perl developer deal with these cases?


TIA,

David
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.