Safefree() after a fork()?

Hello,

	I have a failing test for an XS module in Win32, and I=E2=80=99ve =
isolated it to what I think is about the smallest-possible reproduction:

	https://github.com/FGasper/p5-win32-safefree-bug

	In brief:

1) Newxz() allocates a buffer.
2) fork()
3) In the =E2=80=9Csubprocess=E2=80=9D, the buffer from step 1 is =
Safefree()d.

	Does Win32 require any special handling of this circumstance? =
I=E2=80=99m getting =E2=80=9CFree to wrong pool =E2=80=A6=E2=80=9D =
errors on the Safefree().

	Thank you for reading and for any insights you may be able to =
offer!

cheers,
-Felipe Gasper=