gmane.comp.capabilities.general archive
386 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →
Reasoning about Object Capabilities using Logical Relations and Effect Parametricity
Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:57:16 +0100Re: Fwd: Fwd: Draft Proposed Standard SES (Secure EcmaScript)
Tue, 22 Mar 2016 23:05:08 -0700Re: Fwd: Fwd: Draft Proposed Standard SES (Secure EcmaScript)
Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:11:20 -0700Re: Fwd: Fwd: Draft Proposed Standard SES (Secure EcmaScript)
Sun, 20 Mar 2016 22:10:06 -0500Re: Fwd: Fwd: Draft Proposed Standard SES (Secure EcmaScript)
Sun, 20 Mar 2016 16:02:14 -0700Re: Fwd: Fwd: Draft Proposed Standard SES (Secure EcmaScript)
Sun, 20 Mar 2016 12:38:59 -0700Re: Fwd: Fwd: Draft Proposed Standard SES (Secure EcmaScript)
Sun, 20 Mar 2016 00:16:44 -0700Fwd: Fwd: Draft Proposed Standard SES (Secure EcmaScript)
Sat, 19 Mar 2016 11:55:57 -0700Re: Fwd: Draft Proposed Standard SES (Secure EcmaScript)
Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:44:15 -0700Re: TIL: all exceptions before the commit point
Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:19:35 -0700Re: TIL: all exceptions before the commit point
Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:18:13 -0700TIL: all exceptions before the commit point
Fri, 18 Mar 2016 21:15:36 -0500Re: Fwd: Draft Proposed Standard SES (Secure EcmaScript)
Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:34:39 -0500Fwd: Draft Proposed Standard SES (Secure EcmaScript)
Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:24:55 -0700Password security on unencrypted channels
Sat, 5 Mar 2016 20:34:42 -0600Is Polkit (nearly) a powerbox?
Sun, 28 Feb 2016 19:09:07 -0600Fwd: [Caja] Object capability success story in Mozilla
Sat, 20 Feb 2016 17:30:17 -0800Re: Are capabilities becoming mainstream?
Sat, 20 Feb 2016 10:28:43 -0800Re: Unix domain sockets and MAC confined processes as (object) capability system?
Fri, 19 Feb 2016 12:54:05 -0800Re: Unix domain sockets and MAC confined processes as (object) capability system?
Thu, 18 Feb 2016 23:19:50 -0800Unix domain sockets and MAC confined processes as (object) capability system?
Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:04:41 +0100Are capabilities becoming mainstream?
Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:35:57 -0800Re: Capability allegories
Wed, 3 Feb 2016 13:11:12 +1100Re: Capability allegories
Tue, 2 Feb 2016 17:31:02 -0800Re: Capability allegories
Wed, 3 Feb 2016 11:53:40 +1100Re: Capability allegories
Tue, 2 Feb 2016 13:36:22 -0800Re: Capability allegories
Tue, 2 Feb 2016 13:23:00 -0800Capability allegories
Tue, 2 Feb 2016 10:00:19 -0800Why it's to hard to explain capabilities to security professionals?
Sun, 31 Jan 2016 11:52:53 -0800Yikes
Sat, 30 Jan 2016 11:46:17 -0800Re: cap patterns in 1ml
Tue, 26 Jan 2016 01:35:30 -0800Re: cap patterns in 1ml
Mon, 25 Jan 2016 13:17:00 -0800Re: cap patterns in 1ml
Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:19:18 -0800Re: cap patterns in 1ml
Sun, 24 Jan 2016 13:48:13 -0800Re: Secure email
Thu, 21 Jan 2016 01:15:56 -0800Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Wed, 20 Jan 2016 10:11:33 -0500Re: [SPAM] Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Tue, 19 Jan 2016 21:14:00 -0800Re: cap patterns in 1ml
Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:45:24 -0800First beta MattockFS
Tue, 19 Jan 2016 16:52:06 +0100Re: Access control for IoT
Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:59:47 -0800Re: Access control for IoT
Tue, 19 Jan 2016 09:41:18 +0100Re: Access control for IoT
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 22:57:23 -0800Re: Access control for IoT
Tue, 19 Jan 2016 07:49:56 +0100Re: Access control for IoT
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 22:47:24 -0800Re: Access control for IoT
Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:16:42 +1100Re: [SPAM] Re: Secure email
Tue, 19 Jan 2016 01:08:21 -0500Re: Access control for IoT
Tue, 19 Jan 2016 07:07:05 +0100Re: [SPAM] Secure email
Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:43:47 -0500Re: Access control for IoT
Tue, 19 Jan 2016 14:10:38 +1100Re: Access control for IoT
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 17:30:10 -0800Re: Access control for IoT
Tue, 19 Jan 2016 12:11:57 +1100Re: Secure email (was: Re: [friam] and so it goes )
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:24:07 -0800Secure email (was: Re: [friam] and so it goes )
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 13:56:03 -0800Re: Access control for IoT
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 21:54:09 +0000Re: Access control for IoT
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 13:07:42 -0800Re: Access control for IoT
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 20:59:00 +0100Re: Access control for IoT
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:59:44 -0800Re: Access control for IoT
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 19:42:22 +0100Re: Getting to default encrypted/signed email (was: Re: [friam] and so it goes)
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:03:05 -0800Re: [SPAM] Re: [friam] and so it goes
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:57:43 -0500Re: [friam] and so it goes
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 14:18:02 +0000Re: Getting to default encrypted/signed email (was: Re: [friam] and so it goes)
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:59:29 +0000Getting to default encrypted/signed email (was: Re: [friam] and so it goes)
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 01:02:03 -0800Re: [friam] and so it goes
Sun, 17 Jan 2016 23:25:33 -0600Re: [friam] and so it goes
Sun, 17 Jan 2016 12:35:28 -0800Re: [SPAM] Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Sun, 17 Jan 2016 12:42:00 -0800Re: Access control for IoT
Sun, 17 Jan 2016 17:16:39 +0000cap patterns in 1ml
Sat, 16 Jan 2016 18:11:59 -0800Re: [SPAM] Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Sat, 16 Jan 2016 19:35:24 +0000 (GMT)Re: Access control for IoT
Sat, 16 Jan 2016 10:26:17 -0800Re: Access control for IoT
Sat, 16 Jan 2016 09:59:47 -0800Re: Access control for IoT
Sat, 16 Jan 2016 15:51:24 +0000Re: [SPAM] Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Fri, 15 Jan 2016 21:44:42 -0500Re: Access control for IoT
Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:07:33 -0500Re: Access control for IoT
Fri, 15 Jan 2016 15:59:48 -0800Re: Access control for IoT
Fri, 15 Jan 2016 15:53:38 -0800Access control for IoT
Fri, 15 Jan 2016 15:13:58 -0800Re: [e-lang] SOSP History Day
Thu, 14 Jan 2016 08:34:25 -0800 (PST)Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:05:58 +0100Re: fun with Capper and OFX financial transaction fetching
Thu, 7 Jan 2016 10:31:25 -0800Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Wed, 6 Jan 2016 08:45:29 -0800Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Wed, 6 Jan 2016 01:10:52 -0800Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Tue, 5 Jan 2016 19:20:23 -0700Re: fun with Capper and OFX financial transaction fetching
Tue, 5 Jan 2016 18:46:35 -0700Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Tue, 5 Jan 2016 16:05:04 -0800Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:40:01 -0800Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:28:45 -0800Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:12:04 -0800Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:08:58 -0800Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:01:48 -0800Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:00:09 -0800Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:46:46 -0800Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:14:31 -0800Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:48:49 -0800Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:19:34 -0800Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Tue, 5 Jan 2016 09:43:19 -0800Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Tue, 5 Jan 2016 09:38:25 -0800Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Tue, 5 Jan 2016 08:24:55 -0800Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Tue, 5 Jan 2016 07:27:57 -0800Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Tue, 5 Jan 2016 13:41:38 +0100
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.