gmane.comp.emulators.hercules390.advocacy archive

352 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →

Might not need advocacy
06 Jan 2017 08:35:38 -0800
"[email protected] [hercules-advocacy]" <[email protected]> • #676
Re: [hercules-390] z/OS 2.2
29 Oct 2015 12:54:01 -0700
"somitcw-/[email protected] [hercules-advocacy]" <[email protected]> • #675
ANNOUCMENT: SoftDevLabs email and web site (temporarily?) unavailable
Tue, 15 Jul 2014 20:27:55 -0700
"'\'Fish\' \(David B. Trout\)' [email protected] [hercules-advocacy]" <[email protected]> • #674
ANNOUNCEMENT: CTCI-WIN version 3.3.3.3226 is BAD
Thu, 10 Jul 2014 17:21:10 -0700
"'\'Fish\' \(David B. Trout\)' fish-6N/[email protected] [hercules-advocacy]" <[email protected]> • #673
Hercules 3.10 spinhawk PATCH: Report CPU percent utilization for each processor
Sun, 6 Jul 2014 05:47:46 -0700
"'\'Fish\' \(David B. Trout\)' fish-6N/[email protected] [hercules-advocacy]" <[email protected]> • #672
ANNOUNCEMENT: New versions of HercGUI, HercPrt, CTCI-WIN and AWSBrowse now available
Thu, 3 Jul 2014 14:58:25 -0700
"'\'Fish\' \(David B. Trout\)' fish-6N/[email protected] [hercules-390]" <[email protected]> • #671
looking for VSE info (cross posted)
Sun, 25 Aug 2013 05:34:42 -0700 (PDT)
Stan Saraczewski <stan_saraczewski-/[email protected]> • #670
Victory Lap for Ask Patents
Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:18:04 -0000
"Mike Schwab" <[email protected]> • #669
Patent article
Fri, 9 Nov 2012 21:44:49 -0600
Mike Schwab <[email protected]> • #668
Re: This Kit changed all my life.
Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:03:12 +0100 (BST)
John Watson <[email protected]> • #667
Fwd: I am finally became Boss
Fri, 28 Sep 2012 07:19:36 +0100 (BST)
John Watson <[email protected]> • #666
This Kit changed all my life.
Fri, 28 Sep 2012 07:19:33 +0100 (BST)
John Watson <[email protected]> • #665
RE: Re: Innovation
Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:05:17 -0600
"ron.hilton" <[email protected]> • #664
Re: Re: Innovation
Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:28:23 -0400
"Garry G. Green" <garry-QJLpE425g/ittCpgsWEBFlaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #663
Re: Re: Innovation
Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:30:15 -0700
jim s <[email protected]> • #662
Re: Re: Innovation
Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:16:59 +0200
"John P. Hartmann" <[email protected]> • #661
RE: Re: Innovation
Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:01:25 -0600
"ron.hilton" <[email protected]> • #660
Re: Re: Innovation
Wed, 26 Sep 2012 11:25:15 -0400
Tony Harminc <[email protected]> • #659
RE: Re: Innovation
Mon, 2 Jul 2012 10:15:43 -0600
"ron.hilton" <[email protected]> • #658
Re: Innovation
Mon, 02 Jul 2012 12:23:15 -0000
"Roger Bowler" <rogerbowler-/[email protected]> • #657
RE: Innovation
Fri, 1 Jun 2012 09:24:52 -0600
"ron.hilton" <[email protected]> • #656
RE: Innovation
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 05:07:17 -0500
Harold Grovesteen <[email protected]> • #655
RE: Innovation
Thu, 31 May 2012 08:32:45 -0600
"ron.hilton" <[email protected]> • #654
RE: Re: Innovation
Thu, 31 May 2012 08:21:12 -0600
"ron.hilton" <[email protected]> • #653
Re: Innovation
Thu, 31 May 2012 14:31:37 +0100 (BST)
John Watson <[email protected]> • #652
RE: Innovation
Thu, 31 May 2012 15:14:21 +0300
"Rocky" <[email protected]> • #651
RE: Innovation
Wed, 30 May 2012 16:12:41 -0600
"ron.hilton" <[email protected]> • #650
Re: Innovation
Tue, 29 May 2012 04:57:28 -0500
Harold Grovesteen <[email protected]> • #649
RE: Innovation
Mon, 28 May 2012 23:01:39 -0600
"ron.hilton" <[email protected]> • #648
RE: Innovation
Mon, 28 May 2012 19:41:01 +0300
"Rocky" <[email protected]> • #647
Re: Innovation
Mon, 28 May 2012 17:42:26 +0200
Roger Bowler <rogerbowler-/[email protected]> • #646
RE: Innovation
Mon, 28 May 2012 09:27:40 -0500
Harold Grovesteen <[email protected]> • #645
Re: Innovation
Mon, 28 May 2012 08:47:34 -0500
Harold Grovesteen <[email protected]> • #644
Re: Innovation
Mon, 28 May 2012 12:58:37 +0200
Roger Bowler <rogerbowler-/[email protected]> • #643
Re: Innovation
Mon, 28 May 2012 11:57:52 +0200
Roger Bowler <rogerbowler-/[email protected]> • #642
RE: Innovation
Sat, 26 May 2012 12:21:41 -0600
"ron.hilton" <[email protected]> • #641
RE: Innovation
Sat, 26 May 2012 20:21:08 +0300
"Rocky" <[email protected]> • #640
Re: Innovation
Sat, 26 May 2012 18:26:51 +0200
Roger Bowler <rogerbowler-/[email protected]> • #639
Re: Innovation
Fri, 25 May 2012 15:42:47 -0700
jim s <[email protected]> • #638
Re: Innovation
Fri, 25 May 2012 11:45:38 -0400
Tony Harminc <[email protected]> • #637
RE: Innovation
Thu, 24 May 2012 22:56:47 -0600
"ron.hilton" <[email protected]> • #636
Re: Innovation
Thu, 24 May 2012 17:06:43 -0700
jim s <[email protected]> • #635
Re: Innovation
Thu, 24 May 2012 23:41:43 +0200
"John P. Hartmann" <[email protected]> • #634
Innovation
Thu, 24 May 2012 22:48:04 +0200
Roger Bowler <rogerbowler-/[email protected]> • #633
RE: RE: [hercules-390] Re: RESOLVED: HDL: no dependency section in hdt3420; devtype 3420 not recognized
Wed, 9 May 2012 22:15:29 -0700
"\"Fish\" \(David B. Trout\)" <fish-6N/[email protected]> • #632
[hercules-390] Re: RESOLVED: HDL: no dependency section in hdt3420; devtype 3420 not recognized
Wed, 09 May 2012 13:08:35 -0000
"Roger Bowler" <rogerbowler-/[email protected]> • #631
RE: RE: [hercules-390] Re: RESOLVED: HDL: no dependency section in hdt3420; devtype 3420 not recognized
Wed, 9 May 2012 13:45:51 +0300
"Rocky" <[email protected]> • #630
[hercules-390] Re: RESOLVED: HDL: no dependency section in hdt3420; devtype 3420 not recognized
Wed, 09 May 2012 03:57:54 -0000
"somitcw" <somitcw-/[email protected]> • #629
Re: RE: [hercules-390] Re: RESOLVED: HDL: no dependency section in hdt3420; devtype 3420 not recognized
Tue, 8 May 2012 15:09:59 -0500
Mike Schwab <[email protected]> • #628
RE: [hercules-390] Re: RESOLVED: HDL: no dependency section in hdt3420; devtype 3420 not recognized
Tue, 8 May 2012 12:36:39 -0700
"\"Fish\" \(David B. Trout\)" <fish-6N/[email protected]> • #627
Re: Pushing back the barriers and beingdemolished by IBM
Wed, 09 Nov 2011 15:25:50 -0000
"Roger Bowler" <rogerbowler-/[email protected]> • #626
Re: Re: Pushing back the barriers and beingdemolished by IBM
Mon, 7 Nov 2011 11:12:07 -0600
Jay Maynard <jmaynard-NaA3cy51gWZWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #625
Re: Re: Pushing back the barriers and beingdemolished by IBM
Mon, 7 Nov 2011 09:02:28 -0800
Ray Mullins <[email protected]> • #624
RE: Re: Pushing back the barriers and beingdemolished by IBM
Mon, 7 Nov 2011 08:37:55 -0700
"ron.hilton" <[email protected]> • #623
Re: Re: Pushing back the barriers and being demolished by IBM
Mon, 7 Nov 2011 09:23:51 -0600
Jay Maynard <jmaynard-NaA3cy51gWZWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #622
RE: Re: Pushing back the barriers and being demolished by IBM
Mon, 7 Nov 2011 08:20:50 -0700
"ron.hilton" <[email protected]> • #621
RE: Re: Pushing back the barriers and being demolished by IBM
Mon, 7 Nov 2011 08:18:55 -0700
"ron.hilton" <[email protected]> • #620
Re: Pushing back the barriers and being demolished by IBM
Mon, 7 Nov 2011 08:53:43 -0600
Charles Durrett <[email protected]> • #619
Re: Pushing back the barriers and being demolished by IBM
Mon, 07 Nov 2011 14:16:12 -0000
"Roger Bowler" <rogerbowler-/[email protected]> • #618
Re: Re: Pushing back the barriers and being demolished by IBM
Sat, 05 Nov 2011 23:11:45 +0100
Roger Bowler <rogerbowler-/[email protected]> • #617
RE: Re: Pushing back the barriers and being demolished by IBM
Fri, 4 Nov 2011 11:18:08 -0600
"ron.hilton" <[email protected]> • #616
Re: Pushing back the barriers and being demolished by IBM
Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:55:03 -0000
"Roger Bowler" <rogerbowler-/[email protected]> • #615
RE: Re: Pushing back the barriers and being demolished by IBM
Thu, 3 Nov 2011 08:40:42 -0600
"ron.hilton" <[email protected]> • #614
Re: Pushing back the barriers and being demolished by IBM
Wed, 17 Aug 2011 10:20:24 -0000
"kerravon86" <kerravon86-/[email protected]> • #613
Re: Pushing back the barriers and being demolished by IBM
Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:03:06 -0000
"Roger Bowler" <rogerbowler-/[email protected]> • #612
Re: Pushing back the barriers and being demolished by IBM
Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:39:09 -0000
"Roger Bowler" <rogerbowler-/[email protected]> • #611
Re: Pushing back the barriers and being demolished by IBM
Tue, 09 Aug 2011 06:12:08 -0500
Harold Grovesteen <[email protected]> • #610
Pushing back the barriers and being demolished by IBM
Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:29:51 -0000
"Roger Bowler" <rogerbowler-/[email protected]> • #609
Re: IBM tightens grip on mainframe ecosphere
Sun, 07 Aug 2011 19:37:49 -0400
"Peter D. Ward" <pdw-8vCV/[email protected]> • #608
Re: IBM tightens grip on mainframe ecosphere
Sun, 07 Aug 2011 18:48:59 -0400
"Peter D. Ward" <pdw-8vCV/[email protected]> • #607
Re: IBM tightens grip on mainframe ecosphere
Sun, 07 Aug 2011 23:28:52 +0200
Roger Bowler <rogerbowler-/[email protected]> • #606
Re: IBM tightens grip on mainframe ecosphere
Sun, 07 Aug 2011 23:24:51 +0200
Roger Bowler <rogerbowler-/[email protected]> • #605
RE: IBM tightens grip on mainframe ecosphere
Sat, 6 Aug 2011 20:41:30 -0700
"\"Fish\" \(David B. Trout\)" <fish-6N/[email protected]> • #604
Re: IBM tightens grip on mainframe ecosphere
Sat, 06 Aug 2011 16:06:12 -0400
"Peter D. Ward" <pdw-8vCV/[email protected]> • #603
Re: Re: IBM tightens grip on mainframe ecosphere
Sat, 06 Aug 2011 15:37:24 -0400
"Peter D. Ward" <pdw-8vCV/[email protected]> • #602
RE: Re: IBM tightens grip on mainframe ecosphere
Sat, 6 Aug 2011 10:20:26 +0100
"Dave" <[email protected]> • #601
Re: IBM tightens grip on mainframe ecosphere
Sat, 06 Aug 2011 02:55:04 -0000
"kerravon86" <kerravon86-/[email protected]> • #600
IBM tightens grip on mainframe ecosphere
Thu, 04 Aug 2011 09:05:41 -0000
"Roger Bowler" <rogerbowler-/[email protected]> • #599
Re: TurboPDOS
Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:37:43 -0500
Mike Schwab <[email protected]> • #598
RE: TurboPDOS
Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:31:58 +1000
"au1john" <au1john-/[email protected]> • #597
RE: TurboPDOS
Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:22:01 +0300
"Rocky" <[email protected]> • #596
TurboPDOS
Mon, 18 Apr 2011 08:37:04 -0000
"kerravon86" <kerravon86-/[email protected]> • #595
Re: What Are the Chances That CICS/VS will Be Available for DOS/VS Under Hercule
Mon, 27 Dec 2010 21:01:50 -0000
"halfmeg" <[email protected]> • #594
Re: What Are the Chances That CICS/VS will Be Available for DOS/VS Under Hercules???
Mon, 27 Dec 2010 20:53:11 -0000
"Robert" <dosvsoperator-/[email protected]> • #593
Re: Re: What Are the Chances That CICS/VS will Be Available for DOS/VS Under Hercules???
Mon, 27 Dec 2010 12:02:50 -0600
Mike Schwab <[email protected]> • #592
Re: What Are the Chances That CICS/VS will Be Available for DOS/VS Under Hercules???
Mon, 27 Dec 2010 16:58:15 -0000
"Robert" <dosvsoperator-/[email protected]> • #591
lawsuits ?
Fri, 5 Nov 2010 05:58:59 -0700 (PDT)
Stan Saraczewski <stan_saraczewski-/[email protected]> • #590
Re: Re: Patent applications by someone else
Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:25:29 -0400
Tony Harminc <[email protected]> • #589
Re: Re: [hercules-390] Proxy Coupling Technology
Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:05:51 -0400
Tony Harminc <[email protected]> • #588
Custodians of the platform
Fri, 8 Oct 2010 17:20:04 +0200
Roger Bowler <rogerbowler-/[email protected]> • #587
RE: Re: [hercules-390] Proxy Coupling Technology
Wed, 6 Oct 2010 12:50:17 -0600
"ron.hilton" <[email protected]> • #586
Re: Re: Patent applications by someone else
Tue, 05 Oct 2010 14:00:19 -0700
"Mark L. Gaubatz" <[email protected]> • #585
Re: Patent applications by someone else
Tue, 05 Oct 2010 22:23:20 +0200
Roger Bowler <rogerbowler-/[email protected]> • #584
Re: Re: [hercules-390] Proxy Coupling Technology
Tue, 05 Oct 2010 21:58:46 +0200
Ivan Warren <[email protected]> • #583
Re: Re: [hercules-390] Proxy Coupling Technology
Tue, 5 Oct 2010 14:51:28 -0500
Mike Schwab <[email protected]> • #582
RE: Re: [hercules-390] Proxy Coupling Technology
Tue, 5 Oct 2010 21:48:56 +0200
"Rocky" <[email protected]> • #581
RE: Re: [hercules-390] Proxy Coupling Technology
Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:31:25 -0700
"\"Fish\" \(David B. Trout\)" <fish-6N/[email protected]> • #580
Re: [hercules-390] Proxy Coupling Technology
Tue, 5 Oct 2010 14:21:56 -0400
Tony Harminc <[email protected]> • #579
RE: Proxy Coupling Technology
Tue, 5 Oct 2010 11:07:43 -0600
"ron.hilton" <[email protected]> • #578
Re: Re: slanted article "Inside System Storage -- by Tony Pearson"
Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:28:57 +0200
Roger Bowler <rogerbowler-/[email protected]> • #577
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.