gmane.comp.freedesktop.platform archive

150 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 2). Latest articles →

Enviar email mail marketing trabalhe com mala direta
Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:18:38 -0200
"Joseph May" <[email protected]> • #151
Configuration Files
Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:25:32 +0530
Jayesh Badwaik <[email protected]> • #150
NUMBER ONE Success System
Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:28:15 +0300
"Tommy Lee" <[email protected]> • #149
Gtk/KDE issues - is this the right place?
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 10:58:44 -0600
Ian Pilcher <[email protected]> • #148
Re: hey, remember the platform?
Sun, 3 Jul 2005 12:48:39 +1000
Jeff Waugh <[email protected]> • #147
Re: hey, remember the platform?
Sun, 3 Jul 2005 12:47:50 +1000
Jeff Waugh <[email protected]> • #146
Re: hey, remember the platform?
Sun, 3 Jul 2005 04:52:54 +1000
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #145
Re: hey, remember the platform?
Sun, 3 Jul 2005 04:41:18 +1000
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #144
Re: hey, remember the platform?
Sat, 02 Jul 2005 12:35:30 -0600
"Aaron J. Seigo" <[email protected]> • #143
Re: hey, remember the platform?
Sat, 02 Jul 2005 12:25:53 -0600
"Aaron J. Seigo" <[email protected]> • #142
RE: hey, remember the platform?
Sat, 2 Jul 2005 10:03:02 -0700
"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]> • #141
Re: hey, remember the platform?
Sat, 2 Jul 2005 06:49:48 +1000
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #140
Re: hey, remember the platform?
Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:28:31 -0400
Havoc Pennington <[email protected]> • #139
Re: hey, remember the platform?
Fri, 1 Jul 2005 17:49:25 -0400
Adam Jackson <[email protected]> • #138
Re: hey, remember the platform?
Fri, 01 Jul 2005 17:45:37 -0400
Havoc Pennington <[email protected]> • #137
Re: hey, remember the platform?
Fri, 01 Jul 2005 14:38:45 -0600
"Aaron J. Seigo" <[email protected]> • #136
Re: hey, remember the platform?
Fri, 01 Jul 2005 15:29:11 -0400
Havoc Pennington <[email protected]> • #135
Re: hey, remember the platform?
Fri, 01 Jul 2005 14:09:22 -0400
Chris Lee <[email protected]> • #134
Re: hey, remember the platform?
Fri, 1 Jul 2005 13:27:35 -0400
Adam Jackson <[email protected]> • #133
Re: hey, remember the platform?
Fri, 01 Jul 2005 13:17:34 -0400
Havoc Pennington <[email protected]> • #132
Re: hey, remember the platform?
Fri, 01 Jul 2005 01:11:22 -0600
"Aaron J. Seigo" <[email protected]> • #131
Re: hey, remember the platform?
Thu, 30 Jun 2005 21:37:32 -0600
"Aaron J. Seigo" <[email protected]> • #130
Re: hey, remember the platform?
Fri, 1 Jul 2005 13:33:43 +1000
Jeff Waugh <[email protected]> • #129
Re: hey, remember the platform?
Thu, 30 Jun 2005 21:22:59 -0600
"Aaron J. Seigo" <[email protected]> • #128
Re: hey, remember the platform?
Fri, 1 Jul 2005 11:31:08 +1000
Jeff Waugh <[email protected]> • #127
RE: hey, remember the platform?
Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:27:37 -0700
"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]> • #126
Re: hey, remember the platform?
Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:55:02 -0400
Chris Lee <[email protected]> • #125
Re: hey, remember the platform?
Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:43:10 -0400
Adam Jackson <[email protected]> • #124
RE: hey, remember the platform?
Thu, 30 Jun 2005 08:57:35 -0700
"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]> • #123
hey, remember the platform?
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 15:31:31 -0400
Adam Jackson <[email protected]> • #122
Re: Yet another monthly platform email
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 11:05:50 -0400
Rodney Dawes <[email protected]> • #120
Re: Yet another monthly platform email
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:06:53 -0400
Adam Jackson <[email protected]> • #119
Re: Yet another monthly platform email
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:35:07 -0500
George Kraft <[email protected]> • #118
Re: Yet another monthly platform email
Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:47:50 -0400
Adam Jackson <[email protected]> • #117
Re: Yet another monthly platform email
Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:24:19 -0400
Adam Jackson <[email protected]> • #116
Re: Yet another monthly platform email
Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:23:37 -0500
Chris Lee <[email protected]> • #115
Re: Yet another monthly platform email
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 20:32:40 -0500
Carl Worth <[email protected]> • #114
Yet another monthly platform email
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 14:36:19 -0500
Adam Jackson <[email protected]> • #113
Change of guard
Sun, 20 Feb 2005 14:06:03 +1100
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #112
Re: My monthly 'oh yeah, the platform' mail
Tue, 04 Jan 2005 17:15:50 +0000
Mark McLoughlin <[email protected]> • #111
Re: My monthly 'oh yeah, the platform' mail
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:57:04 -0500
Havoc Pennington <[email protected]> • #110
Re: My monthly 'oh yeah, the platform' mail
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:15:15 +0000
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #109
Re: My monthly 'oh yeah, the platform' mail
Wed, 22 Dec 2004 10:05:52 -0700
Mike Hearn <[email protected]> • #108
Re: My monthly 'oh yeah, the platform' mail
Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:24:22 -0500
Havoc Pennington <[email protected]> • #107
Re: My monthly 'oh yeah, the platform' mail
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 15:26:29 +0000
Mike Hearn <[email protected]> • #106
Re: My monthly 'oh yeah, the platform' mail
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:47:53 -0500 (EST)
Stuart Anderson <[email protected]> • #105
My monthly 'oh yeah, the platform' mail
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:56:42 +0100
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #104
Re: ICCCM vs. technology pimping (was: Re: No more module proposals - decisions need to be made)
Fri, 05 Nov 2004 18:30:58 +0000
Mike Hearn <[email protected]> • #103
Re: ICCCM vs. technology pimping (was: Re: No more module proposals - decisions need to be made)
Fri, 5 Nov 2004 09:53:29 -0800
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #102
ICCCM vs. technology pimping (was: Re: No more module proposals - decisions need to be made)
Fri, 5 Nov 2004 09:50:57 -0800
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #101
Re: getting started
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:37:09 -0500
George Kraft <[email protected]> • #100
Re: getting started
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:00:48 +0100
Mike Hearn <[email protected]> • #99
Re: getting started
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:47:46 +0100
Mike Hearn <[email protected]> • #98
Re: getting started
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:15:24 -0400
Havoc Pennington <[email protected]> • #97
Re: getting started
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 09:31:47 +0100
Mike Hearn <[email protected]> • #96
Re: getting started
Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:18:20 -0500
George Kraft <[email protected]> • #95
Re: getting started
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 06:42:45 +1000
Brad Hards <[email protected]> • #94
getting started
Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:25:24 -0500
George Kraft <[email protected]> • #93
Re: No more module proposals - decisions need to be made
Wed, 13 Oct 2004 11:56:06 -0400
Havoc Pennington <[email protected]> • #92
decisions need to be made
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 16:31:13 -0500
George Kraft <[email protected]> • #91
Re: No more module proposals - decisions need to be made
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 14:08:15 +0100
Mike Hearn <[email protected]> • #90
Re: No more module proposals - decisions need to be made
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 15:03:20 -0400 (EDT)
Stuart Anderson <[email protected]> • #89
Re: No more module proposals - decisions need to be made
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:34:47 -0600
"Aaron J. Seigo" <[email protected]> • #88
Re: No more module proposals - decisions need to be made
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 02:34:49 +1000
Anand Kumria <[email protected]> • #87
desktop platform
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:12:06 -0500
George Kraft <[email protected]> • #86
Re: No more module proposals - decisions need to be made
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 14:09:40 +0100
Mike Hearn <[email protected]> • #85
Re: No more module proposals - decisions need to be made
Sun, 10 Oct 2004 16:35:39 -0700
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #84
Re: No more module proposals - decisions need to be made
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 06:44:54 +1000
Brad Hards <[email protected]> • #83
Re: No more module proposals - decisions need to be made
Sun, 10 Oct 2004 16:43:26 -0400
Havoc Pennington <[email protected]> • #82
Re: No more module proposals - decisions need to be made
Sun, 10 Oct 2004 09:44:05 -0700
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #81
Re: No more module proposals - decisions need to be made
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 01:01:16 +1000
Anand Kumria <[email protected]> • #80
Re: Proposed: libxslt (external dep)
Sun, 15 Aug 2004 18:02:05 -0700
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #79
Re: Proposed: menu-spec
Sun, 15 Aug 2004 18:01:27 -0700
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #78
Re: Proposed: fontconfig
Sun, 15 Aug 2004 18:01:01 -0700
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #77
Accepted?: libxml2
Sun, 15 Aug 2004 18:00:38 -0700
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #76
Re: Proposed: xlibs
Sun, 15 Aug 2004 17:59:53 -0700
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #75
Re: Proposed: systemtray-spec
Sat, 14 Aug 2004 14:41:09 +0100
Mike Hearn <[email protected]> • #74
Re: Proposed: systemtray-spec
Sat, 14 Aug 2004 15:57:51 -0600
"Aaron J. Seigo" <[email protected]> • #73
Re: Proposed: systemtray-spec
Sat, 14 Aug 2004 18:37:32 +0100
Mike Hearn <[email protected]> • #72
Re: Proposed: systemtray-spec
Sat, 14 Aug 2004 13:28:22 -0400
Havoc Pennington <[email protected]> • #71
No more module proposals - decisions need to be made
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:30:01 +0100
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #70
Re: Proposed: libpcre
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 20:06:54 +1000
Brad Hards <[email protected]> • #69
Re: Proposed: libpcre
Sun, 8 Aug 2004 11:49:54 +1000
Brad Hards <[email protected]> • #68
Re: Proposed: systemtray-spec
Sun, 08 Aug 2004 22:30:31 -0600
"Aaron J. Seigo" <[email protected]> • #67
Re: Proposed: libpcre
Mon, 09 Aug 2004 00:15:51 -0400
Havoc Pennington <[email protected]> • #66
Re: Proposed: systemtray-spec
Sun, 08 Aug 2004 23:46:04 -0400
Havoc Pennington <[email protected]> • #65
Re: Proposed: systemtray-spec
Sun, 08 Aug 2004 12:23:58 -0600
"Aaron J. Seigo" <[email protected]> • #64
Re: Proposed: systemtray-spec
Sun, 08 Aug 2004 02:47:41 -0600
"Aaron J. Seigo" <[email protected]> • #63
Re: Proposed: libpcre
Sat, 07 Aug 2004 20:06:52 -0400
Havoc Pennington <[email protected]> • #62
Re: Proposed: systemtray-spec
Sat, 07 Aug 2004 19:58:10 -0400
Havoc Pennington <[email protected]> • #61
Re: Proposed: systemtray-spec
Sat, 07 Aug 2004 19:55:51 -0400
Havoc Pennington <[email protected]> • #60
Re: Proposed: libxml2
Fri, 30 Jul 2004 20:29:19 -0500 (CDT)
"John J. Boyer" <[email protected]> • #59
Re: Timeline, and slippage
Wed, 4 Aug 2004 08:54:56 +1000
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #58
Re: Proposal: recent-files spec
Tue, 03 Aug 2004 10:00:30 +0100
Mark McLoughlin <[email protected]> • #57
Re: query: are we doing printing?
Sun, 1 Aug 2004 16:50:00 +1000
Brad Hards <[email protected]> • #56
Re: Proposed: libpcre
Sun, 1 Aug 2004 16:46:02 +1000
Brad Hards <[email protected]> • #55
Re: Proposed: libpcre
Sat, 31 Jul 2004 23:11:55 -0700
Jeff Waugh <[email protected]> • #54
Re: Proposed: libpcre
Sun, 01 Aug 2004 01:18:57 -0400
Havoc Pennington <[email protected]> • #53
Re: Proposed: systemtray-spec
Sun, 1 Aug 2004 15:25:22 +1000
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #52
size of 1.0
Sun, 01 Aug 2004 01:24:04 -0400
Havoc Pennington <[email protected]> • #51
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.