gmane.comp.gnu.mingw.devel archive

380 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →

An important message from the Project Administrators
Sun, 7 Jan 2018 14:06:02 +0000
Keith Marshall via MinGW-dvlpr <[email protected]> • #5552
Re: RFC: inconsistencies/conflicts in <winsock.h>/<winsock2.h>
Mon, 21 Aug 2017 23:54:13 +0100
Keith Marshall via MinGW-dvlpr <[email protected]> • #5551
Re: RFC: inconsistencies/conflicts in <winsock.h>/<winsock2.h>
Mon, 21 Aug 2017 08:52:30 -0400
Earnie via MinGW-dvlpr <[email protected]> • #5550
Re: RFC: inconsistencies/conflicts in <winsock.h>/<winsock2.h>
Mon, 21 Aug 2017 12:54:22 +0100
Keith Marshall via MinGW-dvlpr <[email protected]> • #5549
Re: RFC: deploying libmingwex-0.dll
Tue, 25 Jul 2017 08:14:30 -0400
Earnie via MinGW-dvlpr <[email protected]> • #5548
RFC: deploying libmingwex-0.dll
Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:56:13 +0100
Keith Marshall via MinGW-dvlpr <[email protected]> • #5547
Re: Bogus pthreads dependencies for GCC?
Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:20:40 +0100
Keith Marshall via MinGW-dvlpr <[email protected]> • #5546
Re: Bogus pthreads dependencies for GCC?
Tue, 18 Jul 2017 15:13:15 -0400
Earnie via MinGW-dvlpr <[email protected]> • #5545
Bogus pthreads dependencies for GCC?
Tue, 18 Jul 2017 17:34:06 +0100
Keith Marshall via MinGW-dvlpr <[email protected]> • #5544
Re: Building Ada System DLLs
Sun, 4 Jun 2017 13:19:40 +0100
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5543
Re: Building Ada System DLLs
Sun, 4 Jun 2017 00:10:43 +0100
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5542
Re: Building Ada System DLLs
Sat, 3 Jun 2017 22:37:40 +0000
David Gressett <[email protected]> • #5541
Re: Building Ada System DLLs
Sat, 3 Jun 2017 20:21:08 +0100
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5540
Re: Building Ada System DLLs
Sat, 3 Jun 2017 15:47:56 +0000
David Gressett <[email protected]> • #5539
Re: Building Ada System DLLs
Fri, 2 Jun 2017 21:58:42 +0100
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5538
Building Ada System DLLs [was: Fortran Patches for gcc 5.3.0]
Thu, 1 Jun 2017 19:03:42 +0100
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5537
Re: Fortran Patches for gcc 5.3.0
Tue, 30 May 2017 23:58:42 +0000
David Gressett <[email protected]> • #5536
Re: Fortran Patches for gcc 5.3.0
Tue, 30 May 2017 22:27:37 +0100
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5535
Re: Fortran Patches for gcc 5.3.0
Tue, 30 May 2017 21:41:19 +0100
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5534
Re: Fortran Patches for gcc 5.3.0
Tue, 30 May 2017 21:06:24 +0100
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5533
Re: Fortran Patches for gcc 5.3.0
Tue, 30 May 2017 20:06:03 +0000
David Gressett <[email protected]> • #5532
Re: Fortran Patches for gcc 5.3.0
Tue, 30 May 2017 20:11:25 +0100
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5531
Re: Fortran Patches for gcc 5.3.0
Tue, 30 May 2017 17:31:02 +0000
David Gressett <[email protected]> • #5530
Re: Fortran Patches for gcc 5.3.0
Sun, 28 May 2017 16:48:28 +0100
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5529
Re: Building pthreads as native windows build
Sun, 21 May 2017 13:48:00 +0100
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5528
Re: Building pthreads as native windows build
Sun, 21 May 2017 13:09:31 +0100
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5527
Building pthreads as native windows build
Sat, 20 May 2017 21:36:27 +0000
David Gressett <[email protected]> • #5526
Re: Building V5 runtime and win32 api as native build on Windows
Fri, 19 May 2017 20:07:41 +0100
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5525
Re: Building V5 runtime and win32 api as native build on Windows
Fri, 19 May 2017 16:56:10 +0000
David Gressett <[email protected]> • #5524
Re: Building V5 runtime and win32 api as native build on Windows
Thu, 18 May 2017 20:28:03 +0100
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5523
Building V5 runtime and win32 api as native build on Windows
Wed, 17 May 2017 18:56:43 +0000
David Gressett <[email protected]> • #5522
Successful build of gcc 7.1.0
Thu, 4 May 2017 22:08:23 +0000
David Gressett <[email protected]> • #5521
Re: 64-bit experiment
Sat, 8 Apr 2017 17:58:28 +0100
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5520
Re: 64-bit experiment
Sat, 8 Apr 2017 12:48:46 -0400
Earnie <[email protected]> • #5519
Re: 64-bit experiment
Sat, 8 Apr 2017 12:36:24 -0400
Earnie <[email protected]> • #5518
Re: 64-bit experiment
Sat, 8 Apr 2017 12:32:08 -0400
Earnie <[email protected]> • #5517
Re: 64-bit experiment
Fri, 7 Apr 2017 18:57:57 -0300
Cesar Strauss <[email protected]> • #5516
Re: 64-bit experiment
Fri, 7 Apr 2017 19:55:13 +0000
David Gressett <[email protected]> • #5515
Re: 64-bit experiment
Fri, 7 Apr 2017 18:37:06 +0100
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5514
Re: 64-bit experiment
Fri, 7 Apr 2017 09:52:08 -0400
Earnie <[email protected]> • #5513
Re: 64-bit experiment
Mon, 3 Apr 2017 11:17:05 -0400
Earnie <[email protected]> • #5512
Re: 64-bit experiment
Sun, 2 Apr 2017 19:30:41 -0300
Cesar Strauss <[email protected]> • #5511
Re: 64-bit experiment
Sun, 2 Apr 2017 17:28:55 -0400
NightStrike <[email protected]> • #5510
64-bit experiment
Sun, 2 Apr 2017 16:47:18 -0300
Cesar Strauss <[email protected]> • #5509
Fortran Patches for gcc 5.3.0
Wed, 15 Mar 2017 16:04:36 +0000
David Gressett <[email protected]> • #5508
Re: RFC: Dealing with MSDN errors.
Mon, 13 Mar 2017 03:27:40 +0000
David Gressett <[email protected]> • #5507
Re: RFC: Dealing with MSDN errors.
Sun, 12 Mar 2017 17:26:26 -0400
Earnie <[email protected]> • #5506
Re: RFC: Dealing with MSDN errors.
Sun, 12 Mar 2017 10:26:05 -0300
Cesar Strauss <[email protected]> • #5505
RFC: Dealing with MSDN errors.
Sun, 12 Mar 2017 09:50:18 +0000
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5504
Re: Building gcc 6.3 for MinGW
Wed, 8 Mar 2017 15:05:40 +0000
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5503
Building gcc 6.3 for MinGW
Wed, 8 Mar 2017 02:56:05 +0000
David Gressett <[email protected]> • #5502
Re: RFC: Make w32api headers (effectively) self-contained
Sat, 25 Feb 2017 11:56:44 -0500
Earnie <[email protected]> • #5501
Re: RFC: Make w32api headers (effectively) self-contained
Fri, 24 Feb 2017 15:10:33 +0000
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5500
Using mingw-pkg in Windows to install to a staging directory
Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:37:34 +0000
David Gressett <[email protected]> • #5499
Re: Possibly ambiguous redefinition of _fpreset()?
Sat, 11 Feb 2017 22:50:21 +0000
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5498
Re: Possibly ambiguous redefinition of _fpreset()?
Sat, 11 Feb 2017 16:57:10 -0500
Earnie <[email protected]> • #5497
Possibly ambiguous redefinition of _fpreset()?
Wed, 8 Feb 2017 22:30:15 +0000
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5496
Re: Failed and successful native builds of gcc 5.3.0
Thu, 26 Jan 2017 09:29:21 -0500
Earnie <[email protected]> • #5495
Failed and successful native builds of gcc 5.3.0
Wed, 25 Jan 2017 22:13:48 +0000
David Gressett <[email protected]> • #5494
Re: Problem with configure when trying to build gcc 5.3
Mon, 9 Jan 2017 19:39:49 +0000
David Gressett <[email protected]> • #5493
Re: Problem with configure when trying to build gcc 5.3
Sun, 8 Jan 2017 18:59:40 +0000
Cesar Strauss <[email protected]> • #5492
Re: Problem with configure when trying to build gcc 5.3
Sun, 8 Jan 2017 13:28:59 +0000
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5491
Re: Problem with configure when trying to build gcc 5.3
Sat, 7 Jan 2017 20:09:58 +0000
David Gressett <[email protected]> • #5490
Re: Problem with configure when trying to build gcc 5.3
Fri, 6 Jan 2017 09:50:36 -0500
Earnie <[email protected]> • #5489
Re: Problem with configure when trying to build gcc 5.3
Thu, 5 Jan 2017 22:32:55 +0000
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5488
Re: Problem with configure when trying to build gcc 5.3
Thu, 5 Jan 2017 17:07:40 +0000
David Gressett <[email protected]> • #5487
Re: Problem with configure when trying to build gcc 5.3
Wed, 4 Jan 2017 22:36:42 +0000
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5486
Re: Problem with configure when trying to build gcc 5.3
Tue, 3 Jan 2017 23:35:50 +0000
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5485
Re: Problem with configure when trying to build gcc 5.3
Tue, 3 Jan 2017 14:24:41 +0000
David Gressett <[email protected]> • #5484
Re: Problem with configure when trying to build gcc 5.3
Sun, 1 Jan 2017 22:57:23 +0000
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5483
Re: Problem with configure when trying to build gcc 5.3
Sun, 1 Jan 2017 22:15:23 +0000
David Gressett <[email protected]> • #5482
Re: Problem with configure when trying to build gcc 5.3
Fri, 30 Dec 2016 10:19:18 +0000
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5481
Problem with configure when trying to build gcc 5.3
Fri, 30 Dec 2016 02:23:46 +0000
David Gressett <[email protected]> • #5480
Re: Using mingw-pkg to build gcc 5.3.0
Thu, 29 Dec 2016 14:36:44 +0000
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5479
Re: Using mingw-pkg to build gcc 5.3.0
Thu, 29 Dec 2016 00:03:37 +0000
David Gressett <[email protected]> • #5478
Re: Using mingw-pkg to build gcc 5.3.0
Wed, 28 Dec 2016 23:19:02 +0000
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5477
Using mingw-pkg to build gcc 5.3.0
Wed, 28 Dec 2016 16:38:18 +0000
David Gressett <[email protected]> • #5476
Re: Windows CE support in MinGW.org headers
Tue, 20 Dec 2016 09:03:49 -0500
Earnie <[email protected]> • #5475
Windows CE support in MinGW.org headers
Mon, 19 Dec 2016 21:12:43 +0000
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5474
Re: RFC: Make w32api headers (effectively) self-contained
Tue, 13 Dec 2016 13:50:07 -0500
Earnie <[email protected]> • #5473
RFC: Make w32api headers (effectively) self-contained
Mon, 12 Dec 2016 22:52:56 +0000
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5472
Re: RFC: Why these <winuser.h> vs. <winable.h> conflicts?
Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:22:33 -0500
Earnie <[email protected]> • #5471
Re: RFC: Why these <winuser.h> vs. <winable.h> conflicts?
Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:00:05 +0000
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5470
Re: RFC: Why these <winuser.h> vs. <winable.h> conflicts?
Sun, 13 Nov 2016 21:17:27 +0000
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5469
Re: RFC: Why these <winuser.h> vs. <winable.h> conflicts?
Fri, 11 Nov 2016 11:43:29 -0500
Earnie <[email protected]> • #5468
RFC: Why these <winuser.h> vs. <winable.h> conflicts?
Fri, 11 Nov 2016 01:29:11 +0000
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5467
Re: RFC: <excpt.h>: __try1/__except1 are broken; are they worth fixing?
Sun, 26 Jun 2016 19:14:39 +0100
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5466
Re: RFC: <excpt.h>: __try1/__except1 are broken; are they worth fixing?
Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:37:34 -0400
Earnie <[email protected]> • #5465
RFC: <excpt.h>: __try1/__except1 are broken; are they worth fixing?
Mon, 20 Jun 2016 21:08:21 +0100
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5464
Re: Is WSL still a viable identification choice for our system libraries?
Wed, 15 Jun 2016 12:19:19 -0400
Earnie <[email protected]> • #5463
Re: Can someone please help me to understand this commit?
Wed, 15 Jun 2016 12:10:08 -0400
Earnie <[email protected]> • #5462
Re: RFC: updating CPU identification macros
Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:57:52 -0400
Earnie <[email protected]> • #5461
Can someone please help me to understand this commit?
Tue, 14 Jun 2016 15:00:27 +0100
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5460
Re: RFC: updating CPU identification macros
Sat, 11 Jun 2016 18:51:35 +0100
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5459
Is WSL still a viable identification choice for our system libraries?
Sat, 11 Jun 2016 11:22:17 +0100
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5458
RFC: updating CPU identification macros
Tue, 31 May 2016 18:03:01 +0100
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5457
Re: RFC: time for a new mingwrt/w32api release?
Thu, 19 May 2016 15:44:49 -0400
Earnie <[email protected]> • #5456
Re: RFC: <sys/stat.h>: S_IFBLK is unsupported on Win32
Thu, 19 May 2016 15:42:45 -0400
Earnie <[email protected]> • #5455
Re: RFC: time for a new mingwrt/w32api release?
Wed, 18 May 2016 15:51:29 +0100
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5454
RFC: <sys/stat.h>: S_IFBLK is unsupported on Win32
Wed, 18 May 2016 11:48:13 +0100
Keith Marshall <[email protected]> • #5453
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.