gmane.comp.gnu.sh-utils.bugs archive

381 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: possible su delay bug
09 Jan 2003 10:26:25 +0100
Bart Wille <[email protected]> • #228
Re: possible su delay bug
Wed, 8 Jan 2003 23:17:01 -0700
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #227
possible su delay bug
08 Jan 2003 10:06:33 -0100
Bart Wille <[email protected]> • #226
Re: Problem with echo ....
Wed, 08 Jan 2003 09:07:50 +0000
Richard Dawe <[email protected]> • #225
Problem with echo ....
Tue, 7 Jan 2003 10:47:15 +0530
"Raghu Kumar Y." <[email protected]> • #224
Interesting problem in date handling of week 1
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 14:14:24 +0100
"Henrik Stoerner" <[email protected]> • #223
Re: Can GNU date do this?
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 20:13:19 -0700
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #222
Re: bug in Makefile
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 20:08:39 -0700
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #221
Can GNU date do this?
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 11:10:11 -0800 (PST)
Kenneth Stailey <[email protected]> • #220
bug in Makefile
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 19:05:59 +0700 (ICT)
"Puntudis T., M.D." <[email protected]> • #219
last-month bug on 31st
Thu, 31 Oct 2002 00:22:23 +0100
richard lucassen <[email protected]> • #218
Possible minor bug in "who"
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:24:42 -0800
"Jim Modecki" <[email protected]> • #217
Re: sanity.sh fails with GNU sh-utils 2.0.x
Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:01:18 +0100
Jim Meyering <[email protected]> • #216
Re: sanity.sh fails with GNU sh-utils 2.0.x
Wed, 18 Dec 2002 01:51:12 -0500 (EST)
Pavel Roskin <[email protected]> • #215
Re: sanity.sh fails with GNU sh-utils 2.0.x
Tue, 17 Dec 2002 16:38:46 +0100
Jim Meyering <[email protected]> • #214
sanity.sh fails with GNU sh-utils 2.0.x
Mon, 16 Dec 2002 19:04:13 -0500 (EST)
Pavel Roskin <[email protected]> • #213
Re: bug in date?
Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:26:12 -0700
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #212
Re: bug in date?
Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:22:49 -0700
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #211
Re: bug in date?
Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:15:57 -0700
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #210
Re: bug in date?
Fri, 13 Dec 2002 09:48:03 -0700
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #209
Re: uname in mandrake 8.1
Fri, 13 Dec 2002 09:44:46 -0700
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #208
bug in date?
Thu, 12 Dec 2002 15:09:42 +0100
Klaus Umbach <[email protected]> • #207
Re: bug: basename 2.0 (win32/cygwin)
Thu, 12 Dec 2002 17:06:53 +0100
Jim Meyering <[email protected]> • #206
bug: basename 2.0 (win32/cygwin)
Thu, 12 Dec 2002 15:00:40 +0200
Jari Vuoksenranta <[email protected]> • #205
uname in mandrake 8.1
Wed, 11 Dec 2002 14:15:17 +0000
"Fredrik Lindqvist" <[email protected]> • #204
Re: uptime in sh-utils 2.0 give "incorrect" output on Mac OS X
04 Dec 2002 19:49:43 +0100
Petter Reinholdtsen <[email protected]> • #203
Re: echo: octal escapes dont work
Sun, 1 Dec 2002 11:44:57 -0700
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #202
echo: octal escapes dont work
Sat, 30 Nov 2002 19:24:44 +0000
Pigeon <[email protected]> • #201
date -d could be more forthcoming in what went wrong
01 Dec 2002 07:52:50 +0800
Dan Jacobson <[email protected]> • #200
Re: who bug i have
Thu, 28 Nov 2002 15:50:41 -0700
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #199
who bug i have
Mon, 25 Nov 2002 17:22:04 -0500
"Jake" <[email protected]> • #198
Re: Bug
Sun, 24 Nov 2002 20:32:52 -0700
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #197
Bug
Fri, 22 Nov 2002 11:24:56 -0500
"Perrault, Brian" <[email protected]> • #196
Re: GNU sed version 2.05 failure.....
Fri, 22 Nov 2002 00:09:41 -0700
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #195
Re: Linux Environment Bug
Fri, 22 Nov 2002 00:06:51 -0700
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #194
Re: changing the hostname on cygwin on XP...
Thu, 21 Nov 2002 23:24:10 -0700
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #193
changing the hostname on cygwin on XP...
Mon, 19 Nov 2001 12:04:41 -0500
"System Overide" <[email protected]> • #192
Linux Environment Bug
Wed, 20 Nov 2002 09:32:40 +0200
"Tzvika Faibish" <[email protected]> • #191
GNU sed version 2.05 failure.....
Wed, 20 Nov 2002 09:38:39 -0500
[email protected] • #190
Re: sh-utils.info misdocuments the date command
Sat, 16 Nov 2002 08:48:12 +0100
Jim Meyering <[email protected]> • #189
Re: DATE set broken
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 11:43:31 -0700
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #188
RE: DATE set broken
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 11:48:37 -0600
"Barnes, Brian" <[email protected]> • #187
Re: Bug in Expr 2.0.12 - .* too greedy
Fri, 08 Nov 2002 17:20:20 -0500
Derek Robert Price <[email protected]> • #186
Re: Bug in Expr 2.0.12 - .* too greedy
Fri, 08 Nov 2002 17:03:47 -0500
Derek Robert Price <[email protected]> • #185
Re: Bug in Expr 2.0.12 - .* too greedy
Fri, 08 Nov 2002 22:52:33 +0100
Jim Meyering <[email protected]> • #184
Re: Bug in Expr 2.0.12 - .* too greedy
Fri, 8 Nov 2002 16:31:59 -0500 (EST)
[email protected] (Larry Jones) • #183
Re: Bug in Expr 2.0.12 - .* too greedy
Fri, 08 Nov 2002 15:55:04 -0500
Derek Robert Price <[email protected]> • #182
Re: Bug in Expr 2.0.12 - .* too greedy
Fri, 08 Nov 2002 20:07:23 +0100
Jim Meyering <[email protected]> • #181
Bug in Expr 2.0.12 - .* too greedy
Fri, 08 Nov 2002 12:24:00 -0500
Derek Robert Price <[email protected]> • #180
Re: DATE set broken
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 19:24:29 -0700
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #179
DATE set broken
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 11:42:26 -0600
"Barnes, Brian" <[email protected]> • #178
printf \xNNN
Tue, 05 Nov 2002 10:02:59 +0000
Padraig Brady <[email protected]> • #177
Re: date error?
Mon, 4 Nov 2002 09:28:31 -0700
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #176
Re: echo problem in Linux
Fri, 1 Nov 2002 19:35:25 -0700
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #175
Re: bug in echo util
Fri, 1 Nov 2002 19:32:07 -0700
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #174
Re: uptime in sh-utils 2.0 give "incorrect" output on Mac OS X
Fri, 1 Nov 2002 19:24:03 -0700
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #173
Re: echo problem in Linux
Fri, 1 Nov 2002 18:54:11 -0700
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #172
Re: date error?
Fri, 1 Nov 2002 18:58:16 -0700
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #171
date error?
Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:28:45 +0100
"Meister, Stefan" <[email protected]> • #170
Re: uptime in sh-utils 2.0 give "incorrect" output on Mac OS X
31 Oct 2002 19:10:52 +0100
Petter Reinholdtsen <[email protected]> • #169
PS. echo --version
Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:25:03 +0300
"Andrew Skiba" <[email protected]> • #168
Re: uptime in sh-utils 2.0 give "incorrect" output on Mac OS X
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 17:57:01 -0700
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #167
Re: bug in echo util
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 16:28:08 -0700
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #166
bug in echo util
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:24:37 +0300
"Andrew Skiba" <[email protected]> • #165
Re: echo problem in Linux
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:03:36 -0700
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #164
echo problem in Linux
Sun, 27 Oct 2002 23:26:07 +0200
"Ronnie" <[email protected]> • #163
uname -s
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:22:36 +0300 (EEST)
Petri Koistinen <[email protected]> • #162
Re: Linking error
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:12:21 -0600
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #161
Linking error
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:21:22 +0530
Gyana <[email protected]> • #160
uptime in sh-utils 2.0 give "incorrect" output on Mac OS X
Tue, 8 Oct 2002 16:59:51 +0200
Petter Reinholdtsen <[email protected]> • #159
Re: BUG in expr command
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 13:01:04 -0600
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #158
BUG in expr command
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 17:23:37 +0530
"Udai Ram Bishnoi" <[email protected]> • #157
Re: uname -v prints the time
Fri, 4 Oct 2002 20:01:22 -0600
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #156
Re: FW: expr broken
Fri, 4 Oct 2002 20:11:23 -0600
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #155
uname -v prints the time
05 Oct 2002 01:23:57 +0930
Colin Rose <[email protected]> • #154
FW: expr broken
Wed, 2 Oct 2002 18:24:56 -0700
"Dee-Ann LeBlanc" <[email protected]> • #153
Re: Bug in basename?
Tue, 01 Oct 2002 20:58:29 +0100
Richard Dawe <[email protected]> • #152
Bug in basename?
Mon, 30 Sep 2002 22:10:44 +0100
Darren <[email protected]> • #151
Re: 'who am i' prints other users also
Fri, 27 Sep 2002 12:04:10 +0200
Jan Stary <[email protected]> • #150
Re: 'who am i' prints other users also
Thu, 26 Sep 2002 17:45:44 -0600
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #149
'who am i' prints other users also
Thu, 26 Sep 2002 08:57:42 +0200
Jan Stary <[email protected]> • #148
Re: bug in date --date="... sec"
Mon, 23 Sep 2002 19:03:41 -0600
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #147
Re: uname -r bug?
Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:57:09 -0600
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #146
uname -r bug?
Mon, 23 Sep 2002 14:41:52 +0200
Stephan Sandvoss <[email protected]> • #145
bug in date --date="... sec"
Mon, 23 Sep 2002 11:14:48 +0200
"Enke, Michael" <[email protected]> • #144
Re: expr: bug in info-page
Sun, 22 Sep 2002 14:16:11 -0600
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #143
Re: todate program...
Sun, 22 Sep 2002 14:06:31 -0600
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #142
expr: bug in info-page
Sun, 22 Sep 2002 20:13:50 +0200
Thomas Goerlich <[email protected]> • #140
todate program...
Fri, 20 Sep 2002 13:44:43 -0400
[email protected] • #139
bug date.exe
Thu, 19 Sep 2002 05:00:09 +0200
Levet Stéphane <[email protected]> • #137
date bug
Wed, 18 Sep 2002 01:19:24 +0200
"R. Neubert" <[email protected]> • #136
shoudn't nohup close stdin ?
Sun, 15 Sep 2002 22:00:14 +0200
Samuel Landau <[email protected]> • #135
Re: Error in "man date"
Sat, 14 Sep 2002 12:17:24 -0600
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #134
Re: 'printf' is not SuSv3 compliant (and maybe not POSIX...?)
Fri, 13 Sep 2002 11:37:59 +0200
Jim Meyering <[email protected]> • #133
Re: Error in "man date"
Fri, 13 Sep 2002 11:17:08 +0200
Jim Meyering <[email protected]> • #132
sh-utils: date.c time format is broken in non-English locale
Fri, 13 Sep 2002 13:42:29 +0900
Yukihiro Nakai <[email protected]> • #131
Re: 'printf' is not SuSv3 compliant (and maybe not POSIX...?)
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 22:30:23 -0600
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #130
Re: chroot_bug_??
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 21:35:28 -0600
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #129
Re: Bug Report about "expr".
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 10:04:54 -0600
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #128
Re: Error in "man date"
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 10:03:02 -0600
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #127
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.