gmane.comp.hardware.avr.gcc archive

359 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: 24 bits (u)ints
Wed, 30 Nov 2016 14:14:23 +0100
Georg-Johann Lay <[email protected]> • #8723
Re: 24 bits (u)ints
Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:18:11 +0530
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj <[email protected]> • #8722
24 bits (u)ints
Wed, 30 Nov 2016 05:40:32 -0200
Diogo Martins Silva <[email protected]> • #8721
Re: Making better use of virtual addresses
Fri, 25 Nov 2016 15:47:31 +0100
Georg-Johann Lay <[email protected]> • #8720
Re: Making better use of virtual addresses
Thu, 24 Nov 2016 12:44:48 +0530
Pitchumani Sivanupandi <[email protected]> • #8719
Making better use of virtual addresses
Fri, 18 Nov 2016 12:16:55 +0100
Georg-Johann Lay <[email protected]> • #8718
Re: PROGMEM on compound-literal arrays
Sun, 6 Nov 2016 14:55:29 +0000
"Paul \"LeoNerd\" Evans" <[email protected]> • #8717
Re: PROGMEM on compound-literal arrays
Sun, 30 Oct 2016 20:17:51 +0100
Georg-Johann Lay <[email protected]> • #8716
PROGMEM on compound-literal arrays
Sun, 30 Oct 2016 11:43:38 +0000
"Paul \"LeoNerd\" Evans" <[email protected]> • #8715
Possible bug in stdio.h *_P functions
Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:56:58 +0530
Tavish Naruka <[email protected]> • #8714
Re: Possible bug in stdio.h *_P functions
Tue, 16 Aug 2016 16:49:45 +0530
Tavish Naruka <[email protected]> • #8713
Re: Question about generated asm
Sat, 13 Aug 2016 18:04:13 +0200
David Brown <[email protected]> • #8712
Re: Question about generated asm
Sat, 13 Aug 2016 14:05:42 +1000
Russell Shaw <[email protected]> • #8711
Question about generated asm
Fri, 12 Aug 2016 18:40:06 -0700
Eric Tang <[email protected]> • #8710
Re: Possible minor bug
Tue, 2 Aug 2016 11:41:04 +0200
Georg-Johann Lay <[email protected]> • #8709
Re: Possible minor bug
Tue, 2 Aug 2016 10:23:05 +0200 (CEST)
Nigel Winterbottom <[email protected]> • #8708
Possible minor bug
Mon, 1 Aug 2016 18:09:54 -0700
Eric Tang <[email protected]> • #8707
Re: Using progmem on the reduced Tiny core?
Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:22:00 +1000
Erik Christiansen <[email protected]> • #8706
Re: Machine Readable Fuse Database
Thu, 21 Jul 2016 23:40:45 +0100
"Paul \"LeoNerd\" Evans" <[email protected]> • #8705
Re: Machine Readable Fuse Database
Thu, 21 Jul 2016 22:52:07 +0200
Juergen Harms <[email protected]> • #8704
Re: Machine Readable Fuse Database
Thu, 21 Jul 2016 21:37:03 +0200
Thomas Kopp <[email protected]> • #8703
Re: Machine Readable Fuse Database
Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:49:18 -0700
Jim Brooks <[email protected]> • #8702
Re: Machine Readable Fuse Database
Thu, 21 Jul 2016 19:15:12 +0100
"Paul \"LeoNerd\" Evans" <[email protected]> • #8701
Re: Machine Readable Fuse Database
Thu, 21 Jul 2016 22:01:40 +1000
Erik Christiansen <[email protected]> • #8700
Machine Readable Fuse Database
Sat, 16 Jul 2016 14:33:52 +0100
"Paul \"LeoNerd\" Evans" <[email protected]> • #8699
Re: Using progmem on the reduced Tiny core?
Thu, 14 Jul 2016 17:34:39 +0200
Georg-Johann Lay <[email protected]> • #8698
Using progmem on the reduced Tiny core?
Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:10:59 +0200
Georg-Johann Lay <[email protected]> • #8697
printf "%*s" format
Sun, 3 Jul 2016 13:52:08 +0100
"Paul \"LeoNerd\" Evans" <[email protected]> • #8696
Re: objdump disassembly lacking RAM symbol names
Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:03:31 +0530
Pitchumani Sivanupandi <[email protected]> • #8695
Re: objdump disassembly lacking RAM symbol names
Wed, 25 May 2016 15:12:16 +0530
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj <[email protected]> • #8694
objdump disassembly lacking RAM symbol names
Mon, 23 May 2016 15:33:31 +0100
"Paul \"LeoNerd\" Evans" <[email protected]> • #8693
Re: GCC 6.1.0, strings and PROGMEM
Thu, 19 May 2016 13:09:31 +0100
Alan Burlison <[email protected]> • #8692
Re: GCC 6.1.0, strings and PROGMEM
Thu, 19 May 2016 16:26:04 +0530
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj <[email protected]> • #8691
Re: GCC 6.1.0, strings and PROGMEM
Wed, 18 May 2016 14:35:09 +0100
Alan Burlison <[email protected]> • #8690
Re: GCC 6.1.0, strings and PROGMEM
Mon, 16 May 2016 22:43:28 +0530
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj <[email protected]> • #8689
Re: GCC 6.1.0, strings and PROGMEM
Sun, 15 May 2016 14:32:58 +0530
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj <[email protected]> • #8688
GCC 6.1.0, strings and PROGMEM
Sun, 15 May 2016 09:14:10 +0100
Alan Burlison <[email protected]> • #8687
Re: gcc-avr 4.9.2 -Os messes with interrupt vectors
Sun, 8 May 2016 16:29:23 +0100 (BST)
<[email protected]> • #8686
Re: gcc-avr 4.9.2 -Os messes with interrupt vectors
Sun, 8 May 2016 16:27:13 +0100 (BST)
<[email protected]> • #8685
Re: gcc-avr 4.9.2 -Os messes with interrupt vectors
Sun, 8 May 2016 19:46:26 +0530
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj <[email protected]> • #8684
Re: gcc-avr 4.9.2 -Os messes with interrupt vectors
Sun, 8 May 2016 06:53:38 -0700
"Thomas D. Dean" <[email protected]> • #8683
Re: gcc-avr 4.9.2 -Os messes with interrupt vectors
Sun, 8 May 2016 14:22:49 +0100 (BST)
<[email protected]> • #8682
Re: gcc-avr 4.9.2 -Os messes with interrupt vectors
Sun, 8 May 2016 12:36:12 +0000 (UTC)
Parthasaradhi Nayani <[email protected]> • #8681
Re: gcc-avr 4.9.2 -Os messes with interrupt vectors
Sun, 8 May 2016 10:36:35 +0100 (BST)
<[email protected]> • #8680
Re: gcc-avr 4.9.2 -Os messes with interrupt vectors
Sun, 8 May 2016 09:22:31 +0000 (UTC)
Parthasaradhi Nayani <[email protected]> • #8679
gcc-avr 4.9.2 -Os messes with interrupt vectors
Sun, 8 May 2016 10:10:33 +0100 (BST)
<[email protected]> • #8678
Re: interrupt in AVR-libc support ATmega32U4 ?
Fri, 22 Apr 2016 15:23:08 +0530
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj <[email protected]> • #8677
interrupt in AVR-libc support ATmega32U4 ?
Sun, 17 Apr 2016 16:18:04 +0900
辻野 太郎 <[email protected]> • #8676
ICE in push_reload for avr
Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:10:42 +0530
Pitchumani Sivanupandi <[email protected]> • #8675
Re: Broken R_AVR_16 relocation? Or is my compiler wrong?
Tue, 12 Jan 2016 15:02:19 +0530
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj <[email protected]> • #8674
Re: Broken R_AVR_16 relocation? Or is my compiler wrong?
Mon, 11 Jan 2016 19:29:12 +0530
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj <[email protected]> • #8673
Broken R_AVR_16 relocation? Or is my compiler wrong?
Thu, 7 Jan 2016 22:55:33 +1300
Dylan McKay <[email protected]> • #8672
Re: avrxmega7 device-not-found
Sat, 21 Nov 2015 08:56:23 +0700
"Adisak Anusornsrirung" <[email protected]> • #8671
Re: avrxmega7 device-not-found
Sat, 21 Nov 2015 08:47:55 +0700
"Adisak Anusornsrirung" <[email protected]> • #8670
Re: avrxmega7 device-not-found
Sat, 21 Nov 2015 08:37:39 +0700
"Adisak Anusornsrirung" <[email protected]> • #8669
Re: avrxmega7 device-not-found
Sat, 21 Nov 2015 08:28:22 +0700
"Adisak Anusornsrirung" <[email protected]> • #8668
Solving the timer problem with the avr-gcc
Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:39:59 +0100
Forum <[email protected]> • #8667
Solving the timer problem with the avr-gcc
Fri, 20 Nov 2015 06:54:52 -0700 (MST)
lsmod <[email protected]> • #8666
Re: avrxmega7 device-not-found
Fri, 20 Nov 2015 11:57:29 +0530
Sagar Pinjarkar <[email protected]> • #8665
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.