gmane.comp.jakarta.ojb.user archive

392 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: OJB 1.0.4, Oracle 10g and LONGVARCHAR column issue
Fri, 16 May 2008 16:45:22 +0200
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20395
Re: question about storing objects
Fri, 16 May 2008 16:39:18 +0200
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20394
Re: question about storing objects
Fri, 16 May 2008 16:28:40 +0200
Abid Hussain <[email protected]> • #20393
question about storing objects
Thu, 15 May 2008 16:14:41 +0200
Abid Hussain <[email protected]> • #20392
RE: Is it possible to force OJB not use execute a prepared statement?
Thu, 8 May 2008 11:39:14 +0200
"Janssen, Roger" <[email protected]> • #20391
Re: OJB 1.0.4, Oracle 10g and LONGVARCHAR column issue
Mon, 5 May 2008 18:24:37 +1000
"Vasily Ivanov" <[email protected]> • #20390
OJB 1.0.4, Oracle 10g and LONGVARCHAR column issue
Mon, 5 May 2008 18:08:26 +1000
"Vasily Ivanov" <[email protected]> • #20389
Database Update
Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:16:59 +0200
Hans Novak <[email protected]> • #20388
How open 2 different Databases ?ope
Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:59:44 +0200
Hans Novak <[email protected]> • #20387
Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: SQL Input from user
Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:38:10 +0200
Hans Novak <[email protected]> • #20386
Antwort: Re: Antwort: SQL Input from user
Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:01:05 +0200
Mario Curcija <[email protected]> • #20385
Re: Antwort: SQL Input from user
Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:24:07 +0200
Hans Novak <[email protected]> • #20384
Antwort: SQL Input from user
Mon, 28 Apr 2008 08:32:06 +0200
Mario Curcija <[email protected]> • #20383
SQL Input from user
Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:56:51 +0200
Hans Novak <[email protected]> • #20382
Re: Antwort: Java DB Mapper
Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:17:39 -0600
Antonio Gallardo <[email protected]> • #20381
Re: Antwort: Java DB Mapper
Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:55:03 +0200
Hans Novak <[email protected]> • #20380
Re: Antwort: Java DB Mapper
Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:47:53 +0200
Hans Novak <[email protected]> • #20379
Re: Antwort: Java DB Mapper
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:34:40 +0200
"Mario Curcija" <[email protected]> • #20378
Re: Antwort: Java DB Mapper
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:33:48 +0200
Hans Novak <[email protected]> • #20377
RE: Is it possible to force OJB not use execute a prepared statement?
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:04:27 +0200
"Christian Lipp" <[email protected]> • #20376
Re: Wrong results using queryByExample
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:55:34 -0700 (PDT)
Schmidt <[email protected]> • #20375
Wrong results using queryByExample
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
Schmidt <[email protected]> • #20374
Antwort: Java DB Mapper
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:10:57 +0200
Mario Curcija <[email protected]> • #20373
Java DB Mapper
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:02:46 +0200
Hans Novak <[email protected]> • #20372
Re: Unexpected result
Tue, 8 Apr 2008 07:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
johne <[email protected]> • #20371
Re: Unexpected result
Mon, 7 Apr 2008 12:36:17 -0700 (PDT)
johne <[email protected]> • #20370
Re: Unexpected result
Mon, 07 Apr 2008 18:01:00 +0200
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20369
Re: Unexpected result
Mon, 07 Apr 2008 08:56:21 -0600
Carlos Chávez <[email protected]> • #20368
Re: Unexpected result
Mon, 07 Apr 2008 08:38:15 -0600
Carlos Chávez <[email protected]> • #20367
Unexpected result
Sun, 6 Apr 2008 22:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
johne <[email protected]> • #20366
Re: updating objects
Sun, 06 Apr 2008 14:12:11 +0200
Abid Hussain <[email protected]> • #20365
Re: updating objects
Sat, 05 Apr 2008 18:49:12 +0200
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20364
Re: Antwort: Re: ObjectEnvelope’s modificat ion detection mechanism – “abort() after fl ush()”
Sat, 05 Apr 2008 18:48:51 +0200
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20363
RE: Is it possible to force OJB not use execute a prepared statement?
Fri, 4 Apr 2008 14:04:33 +0200
"Janssen, Roger" <[email protected]> • #20362
ImageException during object removal from M:N relationships in OJB 1.0.5rc1 with implicitLocking=false
Thu, 3 Apr 2008 10:39:32 +0200
Mario Curcija <[email protected]> • #20361
updating objects
Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:15:56 +0200
Abid Hussain <[email protected]> • #20360
Antwort: Re: ObjectEnvelope’s modification detection mechanism – “abort() after flush()”
Tue, 1 Apr 2008 09:19:12 +0200
Mario Curcija <[email protected]> • #20359
Re: Someone can help-me with my project?
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:07:55 -0700 (PDT)
Andre_LAU <[email protected]> • #20358
Re: Someone can help-me with my project?
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 02:34:50 +0100
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20357
Someone can help-me with my project?
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
Andre_LAU <[email protected]> • #20356
Re: ObjectEnvelope’s modification detect ion mechanism – “abort() after flush()”
Fri, 21 Mar 2008 03:42:13 +0100
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20355
ObjectEnvelope’s modification detection mechanism – “abort() after flush()”
Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:43:51 +0100
Mario Curcija <[email protected]> • #20354
Re: Cache Issue in distributed environment
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:34:21 +0100
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20353
Re: Cache Issue in distributed environment
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:43:48 +0100
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20352
Cache Issue in distributed environment
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:58:20 +0100
Cédric Talon <[email protected]> • #20351
AW: Bugs in 1.0.5rc1
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:45:56 +0100
"Sascha Broich" <[email protected]> • #20350
Re: Bugs in 1.0.5rc1
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:22:17 +0100
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20349
Re: Bugs in 1.0.5rc1
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:06:06 +0100
"Sascha Broich" <[email protected]> • #20348
Re: AW: Bugs in 1.0.5rc1
Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:49:41 +0100
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20347
AW: Bugs in 1.0.5rc1
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 09:46:39 +0100
"Sascha Broich" <[email protected]> • #20346
Re: Bugs in 1.0.5rc1
Thu, 06 Mar 2008 16:57:16 +0100
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20345
Bugs in 1.0.5rc1
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 10:47:39 +0100
"Sascha Broich" <[email protected]> • #20344
RE: Is it possible to force OJB not use execute a prepared statement?
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 17:45:23 +0100
"Christian Lipp" <[email protected]> • #20343
RE: Is it possible to force OJB not use execute a prepared statement?
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 15:01:53 +0100
"Janssen, Roger" <[email protected]> • #20342
RE: Isolation level
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 14:32:47 +0100
"Christian Lipp" <[email protected]> • #20341
RE: Is it possible to force OJB not use execute a prepared statement?
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 14:27:24 +0100
"Christian Lipp" <[email protected]> • #20340
Re: Is it possible to force OJB not use execute a prepared statement?
Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:19:13 +0100
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20339
Is it possible to force OJB not use execute a prepared statement?
Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:24:24 +0100
"Janssen, Roger" <[email protected]> • #20338
Re: BUGREPORT : OJB 1.0.5rc1 : UserAliases in OrderBy clauses are not replaced by the generated aliases for the joins resulting in illegal SQL statements
Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:38:11 +0100
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20337
RE: BUGREPORT : OJB 1.0.5rc1 : UserAliases in OrderBy clauses are not replaced by the generated aliases for the joins resulting in illegal SQL statements
Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:01:29 +0100
"Janssen, Roger" <[email protected]> • #20336
Re: BUGREPORT : OJB 1.0.5rc1 : UserAliases in OrderBy clauses are not replaced by the generated aliases for the joins resulting in illegal SQL statements
Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:55:40 +0100
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20335
RE: BUGREPORT : OJB 1.0.5rc1 : UserAliases in OrderBy clauses are not replaced by the generated aliases for the joins resulting in illegal SQL statements
Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:14:29 +0100
"Janssen, Roger" <[email protected]> • #20334
Re: case insensitive LIKE and addLike vs addSQL
Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:55:26 +0100
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20333
Re: BUGREPORT : OJB 1.0.5rc1 : UserAliases in OrderBy clauses are not replaced by the generated aliases for the joins resulting in illegal SQL statements
Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:50:53 +0100
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20332
case insensitive LIKE and addLike vs addSQL
Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:10:34 +0100
"Geike, Thomas" <[email protected]> • #20331
Re: Isolation level
Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:46:37 +0100
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20330
Re: Mapping a List<Integer> (or Set<Integer>) with OJB.
Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:46:42 +0100
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20329
Re: BUGREPORT : OJB 1.0.5rc1 : UserAliases in OrderBy clauses are not replaced by the generated aliases for the joins resulting in illegal SQL statements
Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:59:31 +0100
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20328
Re: How to check for null values when using proxies?
Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:58:50 +0100
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20327
RE: Isolation level
Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:30:08 +0100
"Christian Lipp" <[email protected]> • #20326
Mapping a List<Integer> (or Set<Integer>) with OJB.
Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:24:18 +0100
Johan Andersson <[email protected]> • #20325
Re: How to check for null values when using proxies?
Sat, 16 Feb 2008 02:00:02 +0100
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20324
Re: How to check for null values when using proxies?
Sat, 16 Feb 2008 01:59:57 +0100
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20323
Re: How to check for null values when using proxies?
Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:01:50 -0800 (PST)
Schmidt <[email protected]> • #20322
Re: How to check for null values when using proxies?
Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:07:57 -0800 (PST)
Schmidt <[email protected]> • #20321
Re: How to check for null values when using proxies?
Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:05:58 +0100
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20320
Re: How to check for null values when using proxies?
Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:15:41 -0800 (PST)
Schmidt <[email protected]> • #20319
How to check for null values when using proxies?
Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:32:05 -0800 (PST)
Schmidt <[email protected]> • #20318
Re: Mapping hierarchy in one table problem
Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:44:12 +0100
"Alessandro Colantoni" <[email protected]> • #20317
Re: Mapping hierarchy in one table problem
Mon, 11 Feb 2008 04:17:52 -0800 (PST)
Schmidt <[email protected]> • #20316
Re: Mapping hierarchy in one table problem
Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:03:32 +0100
"Alessandro Colantoni" <[email protected]> • #20315
Re: Mapping hierarchy in one table problem
Mon, 11 Feb 2008 03:21:22 -0800 (PST)
Schmidt <[email protected]> • #20314
Re: Mapping hierarchy in one table problem
Sat, 09 Feb 2008 01:43:23 +0100
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20313
Re: Mapping hierarchy in one table problem
Fri, 8 Feb 2008 11:01:14 -0800 (PST)
Schmidt <[email protected]> • #20312
Re: Mapping hierarchy in one table problem
Fri, 8 Feb 2008 10:46:38 -0800 (PST)
Schmidt <[email protected]> • #20311
Re: Mapping hierarchy in one table problem
Fri, 08 Feb 2008 19:42:34 +0100
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20310
Re: Mapping hierarchy in one table problem
Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:10:12 -0800 (PST)
Schmidt <[email protected]> • #20309
Re: Mapping hierarchy in one table problem
Fri, 8 Feb 2008 04:38:22 -0800 (PST)
Schmidt <[email protected]> • #20308
Mapping hierarchy in one table problem
Fri, 8 Feb 2008 04:32:54 -0800 (PST)
Schmidt <[email protected]> • #20307
Re: Optimizing object materialization for 1:N relations
Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:21:04 +0100
Tino Schöllhorn <[email protected]> • #20306
Re: Optimizing object materialization for 1:N relations
Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:43:56 +0100
Danilo Tommasina <[email protected]> • #20305
Re: Optimizing object materialization for 1:N relations
Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:22:01 +0100
Tino Schöllhorn <[email protected]> • #20304
Re: Optimizing object materialization for 1:N relations
Thu, 07 Feb 2008 02:06:29 +0100
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20303
Re: BUGREPORT : OJB 1.0.5rc1 : UserAliases in OrderBy clauses are not replaced by the generated aliases for the joins resulting in illegal SQL statements
Thu, 07 Feb 2008 02:06:00 +0100
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20302
Re: order by clause in collection-descriptor
Thu, 07 Feb 2008 02:05:54 +0100
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20301
order by clause in collection-descriptor
Tue, 5 Feb 2008 09:44:54 +0100
"Guillaume DROUIN" <[email protected]> • #20300
RE: BUGREPORT : OJB 1.0.5rc1 : UserAliases in OrderBy clauses are not replaced by the generated aliases for the joins resulting in illegal SQL statements
Mon, 4 Feb 2008 16:13:23 +0100
"Janssen, Roger" <[email protected]> • #20299
Optimizing object materialization for 1:N relations
Mon, 04 Feb 2008 09:16:20 +0100
Tino Schöllhorn <[email protected]> • #20298
Re: OJB 1.0.5 release candidate 1 (unofficial)
Mon, 04 Feb 2008 04:25:37 +0100
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20297
Re: how to re-read repository.xml file without restarting software?
Mon, 04 Feb 2008 04:22:31 +0100
Armin Waibel <[email protected]> • #20296
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.