gmane.comp.java.jsr.166-concurrency archive

397 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →

about the ConcurrentHashMap red-black tree
Wed, 10 Aug 2022 22:13:25 +0800
码ε“₯ via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17590
Re: Concurrency-interest Digest, Vol 205, Issue 2
Thu, 7 Jul 2022 12:01:06 -0400 (EDT)
5015039959--- via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17589
Re: Regression in LinkedTransferQueue since JDK17?
Thu, 7 Jul 2022 15:23:12 +0200
Matthew Swift via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17588
Re: Regression in LinkedTransferQueue since JDK17?
Wed, 6 Jul 2022 21:31:31 +0300
"Dr Heinz M. Kabutz via Concurrency-interest" <[email protected]> • #17587
Re: Regression in LinkedTransferQueue since JDK17?
Wed, 6 Jul 2022 10:18:57 -0400
Doug Lea via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17586
Regression in LinkedTransferQueue since JDK17?
Tue, 5 Jul 2022 19:00:58 +0200
Matthew Swift via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17585
up after outage
Mon, 27 Jun 2022 08:20:59 -0400
Doug Lea via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17584
Re: "liveness" requirements for acquire/release
Sun, 17 Apr 2022 18:12:36 +0100
Alex Otenko via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17583
"liveness" requirements for acquire/release
Sun, 17 Apr 2022 18:57:08 +0200
Govind Jajoo via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17582
Re: ForkJoin updates
Mon, 4 Apr 2022 11:13:52 -0400
Doug Lea via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17581
Re: ForkJoin updates
Sun, 27 Mar 2022 21:33:11 -0400
Dmitry Zaslavsky via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17580
Re: ForkJoin updates
Fri, 25 Mar 2022 09:11:47 -0600
Nathan Reynolds via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17579
ForkJoin updates
Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:07:04 -0400
Doug Lea via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17578
Re: ConcurrentHashMap and equality
Sun, 20 Mar 2022 04:06:10 -0700
Benjamin Manes via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17577
Re: ConcurrentHashMap and equality
Sat, 19 Mar 2022 07:39:24 -0400
Doug Lea via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17576
Re: 8 oooh ese era el 😭 te TV etc etc r f er 😭 fr tott 🀞 it t 😭 you to the 🀞🀞o🀞🀞house 🀞🀞🀞🀞🀞🀞 hou πŸ”ͺ 🀞🀞 try and get to 🀞 Tory to your other t 🀞y Housemate a la πŸ”ͺ a y 🀞πŸ”ͺ🀞 🀞 y try and get 🀞 a y πŸ”ͺ yaπŸ”ͺ a 🀞😭🀞🀞🀞😭 you πŸ”ͺπŸ”ͺ a y try yytoyyyy Copycatrecipe🀞you 🀞 of yourπŸ”ͺπŸ€žπŸ–€yyt note πŸ₯³ to the you y ya πŸ₯³πŸ₯³πŸ–€ at to you and your family yyyyytπŸ€žπŸ–€πŸ€žπŸ€žπŸ€žπŸ€žπŸ₯³ Hope y ou TT
Mon, 14 Mar 2022 09:09:24 +0000
Stephan Diestelhorst via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17575
Re: ConcurrentHashMap and equality
Sun, 13 Mar 2022 20:04:29 -0700
Benjamin Manes via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17574
Re: ConcurrentHashMap and equality
Sun, 13 Mar 2022 20:47:00 -0600
Nathan Reynolds via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17573
ConcurrentHashMap and equality
Sun, 13 Mar 2022 15:51:38 -0700
Benjamin Manes via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17572
Re: hb: potential causality; causal order: explicit causality?
Wed, 2 Mar 2022 12:20:40 -0800 (PST)
Shuyang Liu via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17571
hb: potential causality; causal order: explicit causality?
Sat, 26 Feb 2022 15:36:05 +0200
Peter Veentjer via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17570
Re: About the volatile and MESI Protocal
Mon, 21 Feb 2022 16:10:10 -0500
Doug Lea via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17569
Re: About the volatile and MESI Protocal
Mon, 21 Feb 2022 16:18:19 +0000
Andrew Dinn via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17568
Re: About the volatile and MESI Protocal
Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:41:56 +0000
Alex Otenko via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17567
Re: About the volatile and MESI Protocal
Mon, 21 Feb 2022 08:04:52 -0600
Gregg Wonderly via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17566
Re: About the volatile and MESI Protocal
Sun, 20 Feb 2022 15:25:44 +0300
Aleksey Shipilev via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17565
Re: About the volatile and MESI Protocal
Sun, 20 Feb 2022 10:16:09 +0000
Andrew Haley via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17564
Re: About the volatile and MESI Protocal
Sat, 19 Feb 2022 19:32:07 -0700
Nathan Reynolds via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17563
Re: About the volatile and MESI Protocal
Sat, 19 Feb 2022 19:59:29 -0600
Gregg Wonderly via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17562
Re: About the volatile and MESI Protocal
Sat, 19 Feb 2022 23:34:17 +0000
Alex Otenko via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17561
Re: About the volatile and MESI Protocal
Sat, 19 Feb 2022 17:21:54 -0600
Gregg Wonderly via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17560
Re: About the volatile and MESI Protocal
Sat, 19 Feb 2022 10:46:30 +0000
Alex Otenko via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17559
Re: About the volatile and MESI Protocal
Sat, 19 Feb 2022 11:30:19 +0100
Florian Weimer via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17558
Re: About the volatile and MESI Protocal
Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:33:33 -0700
Nathan Reynolds via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17557
Re: About the volatile and MESI Protocal
Thu, 17 Feb 2022 11:45:05 +0000
Alex Otenko via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17556
About the volatile and MESI Protocal
Thu, 17 Feb 2022 19:27:53 +0800
ι©¬ι‡Œε₯₯ via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17555
Re: Better RecursiveTask Example
Sat, 27 Nov 2021 12:28:27 +0000
Alex Otenko via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17554
Re: Better RecursiveTask Example
Fri, 26 Nov 2021 08:54:51 +0000
Alex Otenko via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17553
Re: Better RecursiveTask Example
Thu, 25 Nov 2021 23:13:35 -0700
Nathan Reynolds via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17552
Re: Better RecursiveTask Example
Thu, 25 Nov 2021 13:40:24 -0500
Doug Lea via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17551
Re: Better RecursiveTask Example
Thu, 25 Nov 2021 15:43:17 +0000
Alex Otenko via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17550
Re: Better RecursiveTask Example
Thu, 25 Nov 2021 15:26:41 +0000
Alex Otenko via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17549
Re: Better RecursiveTask Example
Thu, 25 Nov 2021 15:18:10 +0000
Alex Otenko via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17548
Re: Better RecursiveTask Example
Thu, 25 Nov 2021 13:00:37 +0200
"Dr Heinz M. Kabutz via Concurrency-interest" <[email protected]> • #17547
Re: Better RecursiveTask Example
Thu, 25 Nov 2021 12:35:16 +0200
"Dr Heinz M. Kabutz via Concurrency-interest" <[email protected]> • #17546
Re: Better RecursiveTask Example
Thu, 25 Nov 2021 10:17:09 +0000
Alex Otenko via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17545
Re: Better RecursiveTask Example
Thu, 25 Nov 2021 09:40:36 +0000
Alex Otenko via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17544
Re: Better RecursiveTask Example
Thu, 25 Nov 2021 08:03:11 +0200
"Dr Heinz M. Kabutz via Concurrency-interest" <[email protected]> • #17543
Re: Better RecursiveTask Example
Thu, 25 Nov 2021 07:38:22 +0200
"Dr Heinz M. Kabutz via Concurrency-interest" <[email protected]> • #17542
Re: Better RecursiveTask Example
Wed, 24 Nov 2021 21:12:04 -0800
Joe Bowbeer via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17541
Re: Better RecursiveTask Example
Thu, 25 Nov 2021 06:56:51 +0200
"Dr Heinz M. Kabutz via Concurrency-interest" <[email protected]> • #17540
Re: ThreadLocal performance degradation
Wed, 24 Nov 2021 16:55:34 -0800
Shevek via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17539
Re: Better RecursiveTask Example
Thu, 25 Nov 2021 00:17:35 +0000
Alex Otenko via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17538
Re: Better RecursiveTask Example
Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:30:09 +0000
Alex Otenko via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17537
Re: Better RecursiveTask Example
Wed, 24 Nov 2021 15:28:00 -0700
Nathan Reynolds via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17536
Re: Better RecursiveTask Example
Wed, 24 Nov 2021 17:07:44 -0500
Tim Peierls via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17535
Re: Better RecursiveTask Example
Wed, 24 Nov 2021 22:11:58 +0100 (CET)
Remi Forax via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17534
Re: Better RecursiveTask Example
Wed, 24 Nov 2021 22:55:17 +0200
"Dr Heinz M. Kabutz via Concurrency-interest" <[email protected]> • #17533
Re: Better RecursiveTask Example
Wed, 24 Nov 2021 15:36:36 -0500
Doug Lea via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17532
Better RecursiveTask Example
Wed, 24 Nov 2021 21:15:12 +0200
"Dr Heinz M. Kabutz via Concurrency-interest" <[email protected]> • #17531
Re: ThreadLocal performance degradation
Tue, 23 Nov 2021 10:19:46 +0000
Andrew Haley via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17530
Re: Lock.lock("info")..
Mon, 22 Nov 2021 17:04:13 -0600
Gregg Wonderly via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17529
ThreadLocal performance degradation
Mon, 22 Nov 2021 21:27:36 +0000
Margaret Figura via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17528
Re: Lock.lock("info")..
Mon, 22 Nov 2021 13:06:37 -0700
Nathan Reynolds via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17527
Re: Lock.lock("info")..
Mon, 22 Nov 2021 10:22:06 -0600
Gregg Wonderly via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17526
Re: Lock.lock("info")..
Mon, 22 Nov 2021 15:00:27 +0530
"Kedar C. Raybagkar via Concurrency-interest" <[email protected]> • #17525
Re: Lock.lock("info")..
Mon, 22 Nov 2021 19:20:41 +1000
David Holmes via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17524
Re: Lock.lock("info")..
Mon, 22 Nov 2021 16:29:24 +1000
David Holmes via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17523
Re: Lock.lock("info")..
Mon, 22 Nov 2021 11:52:33 +0530
"Kedar C. Raybagkar via Concurrency-interest" <[email protected]> • #17522
Re: Lock.lock("info")..
Mon, 22 Nov 2021 15:57:54 +1000
David Holmes via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17521
Lock.lock("info")..
Mon, 22 Nov 2021 11:13:25 +0530
"Kedar C. Raybagkar via Concurrency-interest" <[email protected]> • #17520
Re: Object-based monitors vs Lock based-monitors for JDK 17+
Wed, 6 Oct 2021 08:58:58 +0100
Alan Bateman via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17519
Re: Object-based monitors vs Lock based-monitors for JDK 17+
Tue, 5 Oct 2021 09:17:45 +0100
Andrew Haley via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17518
Object-based monitors vs Lock based-monitors for JDK 17+
Wed, 29 Sep 2021 17:50:40 +0100
Pedro Felix via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17517
Re: The generic return type of result-less futures
Tue, 14 Sep 2021 13:34:16 -0700
Kevin Bourrillion via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17516
Re: The generic return type of result-less futures
Tue, 14 Sep 2021 15:51:35 -0400
Chris Povirk via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17515
Re: Does MutableCallSite.syncAll actually work?
Sat, 11 Sep 2021 11:40:01 -0700
Brian S O'Neill via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17514
Re: Does MutableCallSite.syncAll actually work?
Sat, 11 Sep 2021 20:28:16 +0200 (CEST)
Remi Forax via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17513
Does MutableCallSite.syncAll actually work?
Sat, 11 Sep 2021 10:52:16 -0700
Brian S O'Neill via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17512
The generic return type of result-less futures
Mon, 6 Sep 2021 10:25:37 +0200
Chris Vest via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17511
Re: Opaque: coherence partial order.
Mon, 16 Aug 2021 08:04:49 +0100
Alex Otenko via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17510
Re: Opaque: coherence partial order.
Sun, 15 Aug 2021 22:55:22 -0700 (PDT)
Shuyang Liu via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17509
Opaque: coherence partial order.
Mon, 16 Aug 2021 08:39:43 +0300
Peter Veentjer via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17508
Re: How do relaxed access modes like opaque/acquire/release fit into the happens-before order.
Fri, 13 Aug 2021 07:20:37 -0700 (PDT)
Shuyang Liu via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17507
Re: How do relaxed access modes like opaque/acquire/release fit into the happens-before order.
Fri, 13 Aug 2021 09:01:36 +0100
Alex Otenko via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17506
Re: How do relaxed access modes like opaque/acquire/release fit into the happens-before order.
Fri, 13 Aug 2021 08:02:50 +0100
Alex Otenko via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17505
Re: How do relaxed access modes like opaque/acquire/release fit into the happens-before order.
Fri, 13 Aug 2021 06:25:40 +0100
Alex Otenko via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17504
Re: How do relaxed access modes like opaque/acquire/release fit into the happens-before order.
Thu, 12 Aug 2021 21:48:13 -0700
SHUYANG LIU via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17503
Re: How do relaxed access modes like opaque/acquire/release fit into the happens-before order.
Fri, 13 Aug 2021 07:39:59 +0300
Peter Veentjer via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17502
Re: How do relaxed access modes like opaque/acquire/release fit into the happens-before order.
Fri, 13 Aug 2021 07:02:03 +0300
Peter Veentjer via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17501
Re: How do relaxed access modes like opaque/acquire/release fit into the happens-before order.
Thu, 12 Aug 2021 01:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
Shuyang Liu via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17500
Re: How do relaxed access modes like opaque/acquire/release fit into the happens-before order.
Thu, 12 Aug 2021 11:17:24 +0300
Peter Veentjer via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17499
Re: How do relaxed access modes like opaque/acquire/release fit into the happens-before order.
Thu, 12 Aug 2021 09:14:22 +0100
Alex Otenko via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17498
How do relaxed access modes like opaque/acquire/release fit into the happens-before order.
Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:51:16 +0300
Peter Veentjer via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17497
Re: Are there real use cases with the Java access modes?
Wed, 11 Aug 2021 22:00:09 -0700
Brian S O'Neill via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17496
Re: Are there real use cases with the Java access modes?
Wed, 11 Aug 2021 23:36:36 -0500
Gregg Wonderly via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17495
Re: Swing/AWT concurrency
Wed, 11 Aug 2021 16:16:25 +0200
Thorsten via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17494
Re: Swing/AWT concurrency
Wed, 11 Aug 2021 07:12:49 -0700
Brian S O'Neill via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17493
Re: Swing/AWT concurrency
Wed, 11 Aug 2021 07:03:54 -0700
Brian S O'Neill via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17492
Re: Swing/AWT concurrency
Wed, 11 Aug 2021 14:59:28 +0200
Roland Kuhn via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> • #17491
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.