gmane.comp.kde.devel.optimize archive

393 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Close this mailing list?
Sun, 07 Aug 2011 17:17:39 +0200
David Faure <[email protected]> • #1271
Close this mailing list?
Mon, 1 Aug 2011 15:28:11 +0200
Lubos Lunak <[email protected]> • #1269
Re: Let's break this silence
Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:20:12 +0100
Allan Sandfeld Jensen <[email protected]> • #1268
Re: Let's break this silence
Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:30:38 +0100
Erik <[email protected]> • #1267
Re: Profile a widget style
Fri, 8 Oct 2010 20:52:13 +0200
Josef Weidendorfer <[email protected]> • #1265
Re: Profile a widget style
Thu, 7 Oct 2010 23:35:30 +0200
Olivier Goffart <[email protected]> • #1264
Re: Profile a widget style
Thu, 7 Oct 2010 20:32:09 +0200
Alexander Neundorf <[email protected]> • #1263
Re: Profile a widget style
Wed, 6 Oct 2010 23:56:41 +0200
Olivier Goffart <[email protected]> • #1262
Re: Profile a widget style
Mon, 4 Oct 2010 12:47:02 +0200
Esben Mose Hansen <[email protected]> • #1261
Re: Profile a widget style
Sun, 5 Sep 2010 04:34:41 +0200
Allan Sandfeld Jensen <[email protected]> • #1260
Re: Profile a widget style
Fri, 3 Sep 2010 00:01:31 +0200
Olivier Goffart <[email protected]> • #1259
Re: Profile a widget style
Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:11:02 +0200
Lubos Lunak <[email protected]> • #1258
Re: Profile a widget style
Wed, 1 Sep 2010 12:49:57 +0200
Beat Wolf <[email protected]> • #1257
Re: Profile a widget style
Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:44:14 +0300
Mantia Andras <[email protected]> • #1255
Re: Profile a widget style
Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:00:33 +0200
Olivier Goffart <[email protected]> • #1254
Profile a widget style
Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:46:10 +0300
Mantia Andras <[email protected]> • #1253
Re: Let's break this silence
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:27:40 +0430
Mohammad Ebrahim Mohammadi Panah <[email protected]> • #1252
Re: Let's break this silence
Mon, 23 Aug 2010 06:12:52 +0200
Erik <[email protected]> • #1251
Re: Let's break this silence
Sun, 22 Aug 2010 21:54:20 +0200
Alexander Neundorf <[email protected]> • #1250
Re: Let's break this silence
Sun, 22 Aug 2010 08:56:55 +0200
Erik <[email protected]> • #1249
Re: Let's break this silence
Sat, 21 Aug 2010 23:01:44 +0200
koos vriezen <[email protected]> • #1248
Re: Let's break this silence
Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:12:50 +0300
"Ville M. Vainio" <[email protected]> • #1247
Re: Let's break this silence
Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:57:56 +0200
Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]> • #1246
Re: Let's break this silence
Sat, 21 Aug 2010 11:35:22 +0200
Olivier Goffart <[email protected]> • #1245
Re: Let's break this silence
Sat, 21 Aug 2010 09:56:47 +0200
koos vriezen <[email protected]> • #1244
Re: Let's break this silence
Sat, 21 Aug 2010 08:14:28 +0200
Erik <[email protected]> • #1243
Let's break this silence
Sat, 21 Aug 2010 09:51:31 +0430
Mohammad Ebrahim Mohammadi Panah <[email protected]> • #1242
KDE/kdelibs/kded
Mon, 19 Jul 2010 19:46:54 +0200 (CEST)
David Faure <[email protected]> • #1240
Re: Inlining methods of published classes inside the lib?
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:03:06 +0200
Alexander Neundorf <[email protected]> • #1239
Inlining methods of published classes inside the lib?
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:48:05 +0200
"Friedrich W. H. Kossebau" <[email protected]> • #1238
Re: KDE/kdelibs
Thu, 2 Apr 2009 00:09:32 +0200
David Faure <[email protected]> • #1237
Re: KFileItem optimization
Mon, 5 Jan 2009 22:55:51 +0100
Jakub Stachowski <[email protected]> • #1232
Re: KFileItem optimization
Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:55:47 +0100
David Faure <[email protected]> • #1231
Re: KFileItem optimization
Mon, 5 Jan 2009 18:05:30 +0100
David Faure <[email protected]> • #1230
Re: KFileItem optimization
Mon, 05 Jan 2009 09:43:47 +0100
"Peter Penz" <[email protected]> • #1229
Re: KFileItem optimization
Mon, 5 Jan 2009 00:08:15 +0100
Fredrik Höglund <[email protected]> • #1228
Re: KFileItem optimization
Sun, 4 Jan 2009 13:39:31 +0100
Alexander Neundorf <[email protected]> • #1227
Re: KFileItem optimization
Sun, 4 Jan 2009 13:30:28 +0100
Jakub Stachowski <[email protected]> • #1226
Re: KFileItem optimization
Sat, 3 Jan 2009 16:45:02 +0100
Jakub Stachowski <[email protected]> • #1225
Re: KFileItem optimization
Sat, 03 Jan 2009 16:06:56 +0100
Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]> • #1224
KFileItem optimization
Sat, 3 Jan 2009 15:32:58 +0100
Jakub Stachowski <[email protected]> • #1223
Lot of optimization suggested
Sun, 07 Sep 2008 10:28:49 +0200
alpha_one_x86 <[email protected]> • #1222
Re: bring speed back into KConfig
Sat, 26 Apr 2008 02:59:51 +0200
Dirk Mueller <[email protected]> • #1221
Re: Mimetype optimization
Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:02:17 +0200
Olivier Goffart <[email protected]> • #1220
Re: Mimetype optimization
Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:09:53 +0200
David Faure <[email protected]> • #1219
Re: Mimetype optimization
Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:35:35 +0200
Olivier Goffart <[email protected]> • #1218
Re: Mimetype optimization
Wed, 23 Apr 2008 19:48:18 +0200
Jakub Stachowski <[email protected]> • #1217
Re: Mimetype optimization
Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:41:53 +0200
Jakub Stachowski <[email protected]> • #1216
Re: Mimetype optimization
Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:01:05 +0200
Olivier Goffart <[email protected]> • #1215
Re: Mimetype optimization
Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:29:55 +0200
David Faure <[email protected]> • #1214
Re: Mimetype optimization
Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:21:45 +0200
Jakub Stachowski <[email protected]> • #1213
Re: Mimetype optimization
Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:36:09 +0200
David Faure <[email protected]> • #1212
Mimetype optimization
Tue, 22 Apr 2008 20:06:57 +0200
Jakub Stachowski <[email protected]> • #1211
Re: bring speed back into KConfig
Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:01:40 +0200
Olivier Goffart <[email protected]> • #1210
Re: [patch] KConfig: Efficient iterators
Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:18:36 +0200
Olivier Goffart <[email protected]> • #1209
Re: [patch] KConfig: Efficient iterators
Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:20:00 +0200
David Faure <[email protected]> • #1208
[patch] KConfig: Efficient iterators
Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:44:28 +0200
Jarosław Staniek <[email protected]> • #1207
Re: bring speed back into KConfig
Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:41:06 +0200
Jaroslaw Staniek <[email protected]> • #1206
Re: bring speed back into KConfig
Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:21:01 +0200
David Faure <[email protected]> • #1205
Re: bring speed back into KConfig
Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:34:43 +0200
Jakub Stachowski <[email protected]> • #1204
Re: bring speed back into KConfig
Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:58:24 +0200
Oswald Buddenhagen <[email protected]> • #1203
Re: bring speed back into KConfig
Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:45:48 +0200
Juergen Pfennig <[email protected]> • #1202
Re: bring speed back into KConfig
Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:56:59 +0200
Dirk Mueller <[email protected]> • #1201
Re: bring speed back into KConfig, BTW
Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:57:57 +0200
Jaroslaw Staniek <[email protected]> • #1200
Re: bring speed back into KConfig
Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:54:05 +0200
Jaroslaw Staniek <[email protected]> • #1199
Re: bring speed back into KConfig
Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:16:58 +0200
David Faure <[email protected]> • #1198
Re: bring speed back into KConfig
Sat, 19 Apr 2008 22:19:42 +0200
Jakub Stachowski <[email protected]> • #1197
Re: bring speed back into KConfig
Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:20:47 +0200
David Faure <[email protected]> • #1196
Re: bring speed back into KConfig
Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:32:32 +0200
Lubos Lunak <[email protected]> • #1195
Re: bring speed back into KConfig
Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:43:06 +0200
Oswald Buddenhagen <[email protected]> • #1194
Re: bring speed back into KConfig
Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:20:02 +0200
Oswald Buddenhagen <[email protected]> • #1193
Re: bring speed back into KConfig
Fri, 18 Apr 2008 01:48:24 +0200
Dirk Mueller <[email protected]> • #1192
Re: bring speed back into KConfig
Fri, 18 Apr 2008 00:36:51 +0200
Alexander Neundorf <[email protected]> • #1191
Re: bring speed back into KConfig
Fri, 18 Apr 2008 00:24:58 +0200
Jakub Stachowski <[email protected]> • #1190
Re: bring speed back into KConfig
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:25:09 +0200
Olivier Goffart <[email protected]> • #1189
Re: bring speed back into KConfig
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:43:18 +0200
Dirk Mueller <[email protected]> • #1188
Re: bring speed back into KConfig
Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:25:34 +0200
Juergen Pfennig <[email protected]> • #1187
Re: bring speed back into KConfig
Tue, 15 Apr 2008 21:51:01 +0200
Jakub Stachowski <[email protected]> • #1186
Re: bring speed back into KConfig
Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:23:24 +0200
Alexander Neundorf <[email protected]> • #1185
bring speed back into KConfig
Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:59:41 +0200
Dirk Mueller <[email protected]> • #1184
Re: QCString -> QByteArray
Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:55:01 +0100
David Faure <[email protected]> • #1183
Re: QCString -> QByteArray
Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:49:44 +0100
Roger Larsson <[email protected]> • #1182
Re: QCString construction
Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:30:47 +0100
Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]> • #1181
Re: QCString construction
Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:21:55 +0100
David Faure <[email protected]> • #1180
Re: QCString -> QByteArray
Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:10:50 +0100
David Faure <[email protected]> • #1179
Re: QCString -> QByteArray
Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:57:10 +0100
David Faure <[email protected]> • #1178
QCString -> QByteArray
Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:49:57 +0100
David Faure <[email protected]> • #1177
Re: QCString construction
Sun, 11 Feb 2007 22:18:49 +0100
Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]> • #1176
Re: QCString construction
Sun, 11 Feb 2007 03:28:36 +0100
Roger Larsson <[email protected]> • #1175
Re: QCString construction
Sun, 11 Feb 2007 03:22:17 +0100
Roger Larsson <[email protected]> • #1174
Re: QCString construction
Sun, 11 Feb 2007 00:11:52 +0100
David Faure <[email protected]> • #1173
Re: QCString construction
Sat, 10 Feb 2007 23:59:48 +0100
David Faure <[email protected]> • #1172
Re: QCString construction
Sat, 10 Feb 2007 18:45:33 +0100
Roger Larsson <[email protected]> • #1171
Re: QCString construction
Sat, 10 Feb 2007 18:33:24 +0100
Roger Larsson <[email protected]> • #1170
Re: QCString construction
Sat, 10 Feb 2007 12:32:55 +0100
David Faure <[email protected]> • #1169
Re: QCString construction
Fri, 9 Feb 2007 20:22:13 -0500
George Staikos <[email protected]> • #1168
Re: QCString construction
Sat, 10 Feb 2007 02:16:25 +0100
David Faure <[email protected]> • #1167
Re: QCString construction
Fri, 9 Feb 2007 19:53:19 -0500
George Staikos <[email protected]> • #1166
QCString construction
Sat, 10 Feb 2007 01:43:30 +0100
David Faure <[email protected]> • #1165
Re: Static KDE Theme Needed
Fri, 9 Feb 2007 16:28:25 +0100
Matías Costa <[email protected]> • #1164
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.