gmane.comp.lang.concatenative archive

1298 archived articles, newest first (page 10 of 13). Latest articles →

Re: [stack] map fusion
Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:06:17 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2885
Re: [stack] map fusion
Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:44:08 -0400
"Christopher Diggins" <[email protected]> • #2884
Re: [stack] map fusion
Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:33:35 -0700
"Daniel Ehrenberg" <[email protected]> • #2883
Re: [stack] map fusion
Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:29:00 -0400
"Christopher Diggins" <[email protected]> • #2882
Re: [stack] map fusion
Fri, 1 Aug 2008 07:01:46 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2881
[stack] map fusion
Fri, 1 Aug 2008 04:52:43 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2880
Re: [stack] Staapl
Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:19:38 -0700
"Daniel Ehrenberg" <[email protected]> • #2879
[stack] Staapl
Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:36:09 +0200
Tom Schouten <[email protected]> • #2878
Re: [stack] concatenative lexically-scoped polymorphic mutable variables
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:35:20 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2877
Re: [stack] concatenative lexically-scoped polymorphic mutable variables
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:45:16 -0400
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #2876
[stack] concatenative lexically-scoped polymorphic mutable variables
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 03:54:30 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2875
[stack] first order concatenative -> push-based dataflow
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 01:30:26 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2874
Re: [stack] rewriting + second order vs. higher order expressivity
Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:24:52 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2873
Re: [stack] rewriting + second order vs. higher order expressivity
Thu, 19 Jun 2008 06:27:46 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2872
Re: [stack] rewriting + second order vs. higher order expressivity
Thu, 19 Jun 2008 04:49:30 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2871
[stack] rewriting + second order vs. higher order expressivity
Thu, 19 Jun 2008 03:50:08 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2870
Re: [stack] syntax preference question
Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:07:29 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2869
Re: [stack] syntax preference question
Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:03:53 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2868
Re: [stack] syntax preference question
Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:00:40 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2867
Re: [stack] syntax preference question
Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:55:50 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2866
Re: [stack] syntax preference question
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 05:45:38 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2865
[stack] syntax preference question
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 05:04:29 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2864
[stack] Re: Joy's relationship to FP + a Joy variant with combining forms
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 00:33:25 -0000
"pml060912" <[email protected]> • #2863
Re: [stack] Joy's relationship to FP + a Joy variant with combining forms
Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:09:23 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2862
Re: [stack] Joy's relationship to FP + a Joy variant with combining forms
Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:39:28 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2861
Re: [stack] Joy's relationship to FP + a Joy variant with combining forms
Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:53:39 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2860
Re: [stack] Joy's relationship to FP + a Joy variant with combining forms
Sun, 1 Jun 2008 10:57:35 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2859
Re: [stack] Joy's relationship to FP + a Joy variant with combining forms
Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:30:39 -0500
Stevan Apter <[email protected]> • #2858
Re: [stack] Joy's relationship to FP + a Joy variant with combining forms
Sat, 31 May 2008 15:09:20 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2857
Re: [stack] Joy's relationship to FP + a Joy variant with combining forms
Sat, 31 May 2008 14:16:21 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2856
Re: [stack] Joy's relationship to FP + a Joy variant with combining forms
Sat, 31 May 2008 13:33:06 -0500
Stevan Apter <[email protected]> • #2855
Re: [stack] Joy's relationship to FP + a Joy variant with combining forms
Sat, 31 May 2008 13:34:16 -0400
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #2854
Re: [stack] Joy's relationship to FP + a Joy variant with combining forms
Sat, 31 May 2008 12:58:47 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2853
Re: [stack] Joy's relationship to FP + a Joy variant with combining forms
Sat, 31 May 2008 12:31:58 -0500
Stevan Apter <[email protected]> • #2852
[stack] Joy's relationship to FP + a Joy variant with combining forms
Sat, 31 May 2008 11:15:12 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2851
Re: [stack] typing higher-order concatenative languages with standard hindley-milner
Sat, 31 May 2008 03:55:20 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2850
Re: [stack] typing higher-order concatenative languages with standard hindley-milner
Sat, 31 May 2008 03:48:04 -0400
"Christopher Diggins" <[email protected]> • #2849
Re: [stack] typing higher-order concatenative languages with standard hindley-milner
Sat, 31 May 2008 03:25:32 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2848
Re: [stack] typing higher-order concatenative languages with standard hindley-milner
Sat, 31 May 2008 03:14:53 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2847
Re: [stack] typing higher-order concatenative languages with standard hindley-milner
Sat, 31 May 2008 01:41:20 -0500
"Daniel Ehrenberg" <[email protected]> • #2846
Re: [stack] typing higher-order concatenative languages with standard hindley-milner
Sat, 31 May 2008 01:47:14 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2845
Re: [stack] typing higher-order concatenative languages with standard hindley-milner
Sat, 31 May 2008 01:36:24 -0400
"Christopher Diggins" <[email protected]> • #2844
[stack] typing higher-order concatenative languages with standard hindley-milner
Sat, 31 May 2008 01:28:50 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2843
Re: [stack] stackless fixed-arity concatenative languages
Thu, 22 May 2008 14:01:35 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2842
Re: [stack] stackless fixed-arity concatenative languages
Thu, 22 May 2008 13:58:40 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2841
Re: [stack] stackless fixed-arity concatenative languages
Thu, 22 May 2008 10:48:56 -0500
"Daniel Ehrenberg" <[email protected]> • #2840
Re: [stack] stackless fixed-arity concatenative languages
Thu, 22 May 2008 08:32:28 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2839
Re: [stack] stackless fixed-arity concatenative languages
Thu, 22 May 2008 10:50:18 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2838
Re: [stack] stackless fixed-arity concatenative languages
Thu, 22 May 2008 07:27:50 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2837
Re: [stack] stackless fixed-arity concatenative languages
Thu, 22 May 2008 04:14:58 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2836
Re: [stack] stackless fixed-arity concatenative languages
Thu, 22 May 2008 03:38:58 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2835
Re: [stack] stackless fixed-arity concatenative languages
Thu, 22 May 2008 02:28:09 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2834
Re: [stack] stackless fixed-arity concatenative languages
Thu, 22 May 2008 02:03:04 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2833
Re: [stack] stackless fixed-arity concatenative languages
Wed, 21 May 2008 10:39:37 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2832
Re: [stack] stackless fixed-arity concatenative languages
Wed, 21 May 2008 09:15:00 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2831
Re: [stack] stackless fixed-arity concatenative languages
Wed, 21 May 2008 11:19:11 -0400
"Christopher Diggins" <[email protected]> • #2830
Re: [stack] stackless fixed-arity concatenative languages
Wed, 21 May 2008 04:15:32 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2829
Re: [stack] stackless fixed-arity concatenative languages
Wed, 21 May 2008 04:08:15 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2828
Re: [stack] stackless fixed-arity concatenative languages
Wed, 21 May 2008 03:02:29 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2827
Re: [stack] stackless fixed-arity concatenative languages
Tue, 20 May 2008 22:00:23 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2826
Re: [stack] stackless concatenativity + visual dataflow
Tue, 20 May 2008 16:20:14 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2825
Re: [stack] stackless fixed-arity concatenative languages
Tue, 20 May 2008 16:17:59 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2824
Re: [stack] stackless fixed-arity concatenative languages
Tue, 20 May 2008 18:37:28 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2823
Re: [stack] stackless concatenativity + visual dataflow
Tue, 20 May 2008 18:13:23 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2822
Re: [stack] stackless fixed-arity concatenative languages
Tue, 20 May 2008 06:42:22 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2821
Re: [stack] stackless concatenativity + visual dataflow
Tue, 20 May 2008 23:52:56 +1200
"Chris Double" <[email protected]> • #2820
[stack] stackless concatenativity + visual dataflow
Tue, 20 May 2008 05:48:43 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2819
Re: [stack] stackless fixed-arity concatenative languages
Tue, 20 May 2008 03:21:28 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2818
Re: [stack] stackless fixed-arity concatenative languages
Tue, 20 May 2008 01:39:35 -0500
"Daniel Ehrenberg" <[email protected]> • #2817
[stack] stackless fixed-arity concatenative languages
Tue, 20 May 2008 02:15:43 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2816
[stack] 'while' derived from 's', 'k', and 'if' in Factor
Sat, 17 May 2008 21:39:23 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2815
[stack] Re: QuoteAndEval
Fri, 16 May 2008 20:40:20 -0000
"Raymundo Quirino Baquirin" <[email protected]> • #2814
Re: [stack] QuoteAndEval
Wed, 14 May 2008 10:15:44 -0400
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #2813
Re: [stack] QuoteAndEval
Wed, 14 May 2008 16:25:32 +1000
Manfred Von Thun <[email protected]> • #2812
Re: [stack] QuoteAndEval
Wed, 14 May 2008 15:49:56 +1000
Manfred Von Thun <[email protected]> • #2811
Re: [stack] QuoteAndEval
Tue, 13 May 2008 16:43:00 -0400
"Christopher Diggins" <[email protected]> • #2810
Re: [stack] QuoteAndEval
Tue, 13 May 2008 16:35:10 -0400
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #2809
Re: [stack] QuoteAndEval
Tue, 13 May 2008 13:19:46 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2808
Re: [stack] QuoteAndEval
Tue, 13 May 2008 23:22:18 +0530
rahul <[email protected]> • #2807
[stack] QuoteAndEval
Tue, 13 May 2008 15:45:10 +1000
Manfred Von Thun <[email protected]> • #2806
Re: [stack] fundamental type system problems + possible solutions
Sun, 4 May 2008 08:48:23 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2805
Re: [stack] fundamental type system problems + possible solutions
Thu, 1 May 2008 21:35:43 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2804
Re: [stack] fundamental type system problems + possible solutions
Thu, 1 May 2008 08:30:33 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2803
Re: [stack] fundamental type system problems + possible solutions
Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:14:57 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2802
Re: [stack] fundamental type system problems + possible solutions
Wed, 30 Apr 2008 07:52:54 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2801
Re: [stack] are concatenative languages applicative?
Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:24:34 +0200
"Robbert van Dalen" <[email protected]> • #2800
Re: [stack] are concatenative languages applicative?
Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:48:22 +1000
Manfred Von Thun <[email protected]> • #2799
Re: [stack] fundamental type system problems + possible solutions
Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:52:39 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2798
Re: [stack] are concatenative languages applicative?
Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:25:09 +1000
Manfred Von Thun <[email protected]> • #2797
Re: [stack] fundamental type system problems + possible solutions
Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:16:22 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2796
[stack] fundamental type system problems + possible solutions
Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:20:17 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2795
Re: [stack] are concatenative languages applicative?
Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:10:34 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2794
Re: [stack] are concatenative languages applicative?
Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:56:31 -0400
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #2793
Re: [stack] are concatenative languages applicative?
Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:29:47 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2792
Re: [stack] are concatenative languages applicative?
Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:35:46 -0400
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #2791
Re: [stack] are concatenative languages applicative?
Thu, 24 Apr 2008 19:26:59 -0700
Don Groves <[email protected]> • #2790
Re: [stack] are concatenative languages applicative?
Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:58:18 -0700
Don Groves <[email protected]> • #2789
Re: [stack] are concatenative languages applicative?
Thu, 24 Apr 2008 19:39:09 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2788
Re: [stack] are concatenative languages applicative?
Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:47:56 -0400
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #2787
[stack] are concatenative languages applicative?
Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:10:13 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2786
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.