gmane.comp.lang.moo.general archive

37 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 1). Latest articles →

[ANN] GammaMOO 1.8.3+gamma0
Wed, 7 Mar 2012 21:31:32 -0500
"Luke-Jr" <[email protected]> • #38
[ANN] GammaMOO 1.8.3+gamma0.rc5
Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:47:28 -0500
"Luke-Jr" <[email protected]> • #37
[ANN] GammaMOO 1.8.3+gamma0.rc4
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:43:09 -0500
"Luke-Jr" <[email protected]> • #36
[ANN] GammaMOO 1.8.3+gamma0.rc3
Sat, 31 Dec 2011 17:08:23 -0500
"Luke-Jr" <[email protected]> • #35
GammaMOO 1.8.2g4r1
Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:30:01 -0500
Luke -Jr <[email protected]> • #34
They perform a similar function to their longer counterparts, but take up less code space.
Thu, 5 Jul 2007 20:53:48 +0200
"cookie Kreuger" <[email protected]> • #33
Using the C interface, I create my property page objects and add them to the client's property sheet.
Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:07:48 +0200
"Detlef Giglio" <[email protected]> • #32
Hot, news?
Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:18:16 -0300
"Kawoh SCHONFELD" <[email protected]> • #31
Unicode, GammaMoo ?
Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:37:48 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #29
Object versioning?
Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:26:08 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #28
Unicode, GammaMoo ?
Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:54:37 -0700
Will Coleda <[email protected]> • #27
FASD project: Online survey launched
Tue, 25 May 2004 10:00:45 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #26
Re: [Lambdamoo-server] GammaMOO
Sat, 01 May 2004 23:07:34 -0700
"H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]> • #25
Re: [Lambdamoo-server] GammaMOO
Sat, 01 May 2004 23:07:09 -0700
"H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]> • #24
Re: [Lambdamoo-server] GammaMOO
Wed, 14 Apr 2004 17:46:12 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #23
Re: [Lambdamoo-server] GammaMOO
Sun, 11 Apr 2004 18:50:06 -0700
"H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]> • #22
Re: [Lambdamoo-server] GammaMOO
Thu, 1 Apr 2004 07:01:16 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #21
Re: [Lambdamoo-server] GammaMOO
Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:10:57 -0800
"H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]> • #20
GammaMOO
Sun, 7 Mar 2004 09:58:16 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #19
Re: Non-Printable Characters in Strings
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 02:38:33 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #18
Re: Non-Printable Characters in Strings
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 22:44:33 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #17
Re: Non-Printable Characters in Strings
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 09:01:52 +1300
Gavin Lambert <[email protected]> • #16
Re: Non-Printable Characters in Strings
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 06:19:13 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #15
Non-Printable Characters in Strings
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:51:15 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #14
LIST blocks/newlines (Was: Non-Database Format)
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 00:35:18 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #13
Re: Non-Database Format
Sat, 6 Dec 2003 22:59:46 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #12
Re: Non-Database Format
Sun, 07 Dec 2003 11:05:47 +1300
Gavin Lambert <[email protected]> • #11
Re: Non-Database Format
Sat, 6 Dec 2003 21:31:18 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #10
Re: Non-Database Format
Sun, 07 Dec 2003 09:46:00 +1300
Gavin Lambert <[email protected]> • #9
Re: Non-Database Format
Sat, 6 Dec 2003 16:37:48 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #8
Re: Non-Database Format
Sat, 06 Dec 2003 17:09:42 +1300
Gavin Lambert <[email protected]> • #7
Non-Database Format
Tue, 2 Dec 2003 22:35:20 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #6
Re: Re: Proposal: System Object Tree
Wed, 15 Oct 2003 17:41:27 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #5
Re: Re: Proposal: System Object Tree
Wed, 17 Sep 2003 02:45:01 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #4
Re: Re: Proposal: System Object Tree
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 19:13:51 -0700
"H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]> • #3
Re: Proposal: System Object Tree
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 23:59:38 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #2
Proposal: System Object Tree
Tue, 9 Sep 2003 19:54:15 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #1
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.