gmane.comp.lang.nice.general archive

378 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: How do I contribute?
Sat, 7 Jan 2012 21:43:54 +0100
Daniel Bonniot <[email protected]> • #1267
How do I contribute?
Thu, 5 Jan 2012 06:33:28 -0700
"Chadwick K. Boggs" <[email protected]> • #1266
[ nice-Feature Requests-671444 ] Enhanced Null testing with class or instance variables
Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:45:17 +0000
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1265
[ nice-Feature Requests-671444 ] Enhanced Null testing with class or instance variables
Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:37:16 +0000
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1264
[ nice-Feature Requests-671444 ] Enhanced Null testing with class or instance variables
Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:29:30 +0000
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1263
[ nice-Feature Requests-671444 ] Enhanced Null testing with class or instance variables
Mon, 13 Apr 2009 22:55:11 +0000
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1262
Nice analyzed in "Multiple Dispatch in Practice"
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
Isaac Gouy <[email protected]> • #1261
Re: Bjarne Stroustrup: Is multiple dispatch a good thing? - Yes.
Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:37:13 -0700 (PDT)
Isaac Gouy <[email protected]> • #1260
Re: Bjarne Stroustrup: Is multiple dispatch a good thing? - Yes.
Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:40:48 +1200
[email protected] • #1259
Bjarne Stroustrup: Is multiple dispatch a good thing? - Yes.
Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
Isaac Gouy <[email protected]> • #1258
iterator and tuple with forIterator
Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:01:00 -0700
"Dan Shryock" <[email protected]> • #1257
Nice syntax highligthing for SciTE
Wed, 05 Mar 2008 10:28:34 +0300
"Yauheni Akhotnikau" <[email protected]> • #1256
Re: Nice multiple dispatch details
Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:16:37 +1300
[email protected] • #1255
Re: Nice multiple dispatch details
Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:27:19 +0100
"Daniel Bonniot" <[email protected]> • #1254
Re: Nice multiple dispatch details
Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:29:29 +1300
[email protected] • #1253
Re: Nice multiple dispatch details
Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:47:17 +1300
[email protected] • #1252
Re: Overriding == for strings
Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:05:21 -0800
"Dan Shryock" <[email protected]> • #1251
Re: Overriding == for strings
Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:39:08 +0100
"Daniel Bonniot" <[email protected]> • #1250
Overriding == for strings
Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:52:47 -0800
"Dan Shryock" <[email protected]> • #1249
Re: Nice syntax highlighting for ViM
Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:26:08 +0300
"Yauheni Akhotnikau" <[email protected]> • #1248
Re: Nice's DbC vs Eiffel DbC
Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:17 +0300
"Yauheni Akhotnikau" <[email protected]> • #1247
Re: Nice multiple dispatch details
Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:27:04 +0100
"Daniel Bonniot" <[email protected]> • #1246
Re: Nice's DbC vs Eiffel DbC
Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:12:20 +0100
"Daniel Bonniot" <[email protected]> • #1245
Nice's DbC vs Eiffel DbC
Sat, 09 Feb 2008 19:07:19 +0300
"Yauheni Akhotnikau" <[email protected]> • #1244
Nice syntax highlighting for ViM
Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:58:51 +0300
"Yauheni Akhotnikau" <[email protected]> • #1243
Nice multiple dispatch details
Thu, 7 Feb 2008 20:09:21 +1300
[email protected] • #1242
My first real-world Nice experience: impressions and proposals
Sun, 03 Feb 2008 14:57:26 +0300
"Yauheni Akhotnikau" <[email protected]> • #1241
Re: Operator overloading in Nice
Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:13:25 +0300
"Yauheni Akhotnikau" <[email protected]> • #1240
Re: Operator overloading in Nice
Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:16:24 +0100
"Daniel Bonniot" <[email protected]> • #1239
Operator overloading in Nice
Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:59:02 +0300
"Yauheni Akhotnikau" <[email protected]> • #1238
Re: Is it possible to include autogenerated code fragment into .nice-file?
Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:53:07 +0100
"Daniel Bonniot" <[email protected]> • #1237
Re: Is it possible to include autogenerated code fragment into .nice-file?
Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:59:47 +0300
"Yauheni Akhotnikau" <[email protected]> • #1236
Re: Is it possible to include autogenerated code fragment into .nice-file?
Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:16:17 +0100
"Daniel Bonniot" <[email protected]> • #1235
Is it possible to include autogenerated code fragment into .nice-file?
Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:51:50 +0300
"Yauheni Akhotnikau" <[email protected]> • #1234
Re: Install Nice
Thu, 8 Nov 2007 20:03:35 -0800 (PST)
Isaac Gouy <[email protected]> • #1233
Install Nice
Thu, 8 Nov 2007 17:49:31 -0800 (PST)
Bram Riyadi <[email protected]> • #1232
Re: Step by step/link to install Nice compiler
Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:08:47 +0300
Artem Gr <[email protected]> • #1231
Step by step/link to install Nice compiler
Wed, 7 Nov 2007 19:32:49 -0800 (PST)
Bram Riyadi <[email protected]> • #1230
Beckerle, Mike is out of the office.
Sat, 18 Aug 2007 16:20:11 -0400
Mike Beckerle <[email protected]> • #1229
An invitation to the JVM Languages discussion group
Sat, 18 Aug 2007 13:51:14 +0200
"Patrick Wright" <[email protected]> • #1228
Re: unsigned integers, bytes
Fri, 3 Aug 2007 09:23:36 +0200
"Daniel Bonniot" <[email protected]> • #1227
unsigned integers, bytes
Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:40:16 +0200
Stéphane Onder de Linden <[email protected]> • #1226
Begin second youth in your life!
Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:09:15 -0200
"Lawrence Swartz" <[email protected]> • #1225
OT: Invitation to participate in research project
Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:28:18 +1000
Ben Alex <[email protected]> • #1224
[ nice-Feature Requests-1629855 ] Better compiler warnings for ambiguous methods
Sun, 07 Jan 2007 04:56:11 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1223
Re: Current CVS checkout doesn't build
Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:04:01 +0000
"David MacIver" <[email protected]> • #1222
Re: Current CVS checkout doesn't build
Tue, 12 Dec 2006 19:07:18 +0300
Artem Gr <[email protected]> • #1221
Current CVS checkout doesn't build
Sat, 9 Dec 2006 11:30:00 +0000
"David MacIver" <[email protected]> • #1220
[ nice-Feature Requests-1516031 ] Easier way to cast to a superclass
Sun, 02 Jul 2006 15:15:05 -0700
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1219
Re: Wiki problems
Tue, 20 Jun 2006 17:13:53 +0200
Arnout Engelen <[email protected]> • #1218
Re: link to 'news file' with latest feature info dead
Tue, 20 Jun 2006 09:08:06 -0700
"Karl Rosaen" <[email protected]> • #1217
Wiki problems
Tue, 20 Jun 2006 10:37:44 -0400
"Ben Segall" <[email protected]> • #1216
Re: link to 'news file' with latest feature info dead
Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:38:39 +0400
Artem Gr <[email protected]> • #1215
Re: link to 'news file' with latest feature info dead
Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:09:05 +0400
Artem Gr <[email protected]> • #1214
Re: link to 'news file' with latest feature info dead
Sat, 17 Jun 2006 15:19:11 +0200
Arnout Engelen <[email protected]> • #1213
Re: Nice-info Digest, Vol 1, Issue 349
Sun, 18 Jun 2006 22:31:19 -0400
"Sol Toure" <[email protected]> • #1212
link to 'news file' with latest feature info dead
Sat, 17 Jun 2006 01:40:14 -0700
"Karl Rosaen" <[email protected]> • #1211
[ nice-Feature Requests-1445071 ] Introduce * (star) for declaring lists
Tue, 07 Mar 2006 11:58:06 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1210
Re: fast & Nice
Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:36:42 +0000
Inigo Surguy <[email protected]> • #1209
mandelbrot performance on Computer Language Shootout
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:14:17 -0800 (PST)
Isaac Gouy <[email protected]> • #1208
Re: fast & Nice
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 07:42:02 -0800 (PST)
Isaac Gouy <[email protected]> • #1207
Re: fast & Nice
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:22:54 +0100
Daniel Bonniot <[email protected]> • #1206
fast & Nice
Tue, 3 Jan 2006 12:35:09 -0800 (PST)
Isaac Gouy <[email protected]> • #1205
fast & Nice
Tue, 3 Jan 2006 12:39:07 -0800 (PST)
Isaac Gouy <[email protected]> • #1204
Re: PhD defence
Wed, 07 Dec 2005 12:01:13 -0500
[email protected] • #1203
RE: PhD defence
Fri, 11 Nov 2005 02:04:56 +0100
"Bart van der Werf" <[email protected]> • #1202
PhD defence
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 17:08:39 +0100
Daniel Bonniot <[email protected]> • #1201
Re: Nice.tar problems
Sun, 13 Nov 2005 16:13:24 -0500
[email protected] • #1199
Nice.tar problems
Sat, 12 Nov 2005 19:20:57 -0800 (PST)
Isaac Gouy <[email protected]> • #1198
Preventing attacks.
Fri, 14 Oct 2005 16:50:48 -0500
Tom Kaitchuck <[email protected]> • #1197
Re: Check this out for a good laugh
Thu, 15 Sep 2005 19:04:41 +0400
Artem Gr <[email protected]> • #1196
Re: Re: Check this out for a good laugh
Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:04:44 -0700 (PDT)
Imam Tashdid ul Alam <[email protected]> • #1195
Re: Check this out for a good laugh
Thu, 15 Sep 2005 17:45:17 +0400
Artem Gr <[email protected]> • #1194
Re: Re: Check this out for a good laugh
Thu, 15 Sep 2005 05:09:14 -0700 (PDT)
Imam Tashdid ul Alam <[email protected]> • #1193
Re: Check this out for a good laugh
Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:58:23 +0400
Artem Gr <[email protected]> • #1192
Re: Check this out for a good laugh
Wed, 14 Sep 2005 10:31:49 -0700 (PDT)
Isaac Gouy <[email protected]> • #1191
Check this out for a good laugh
Wed, 14 Sep 2005 05:04:47 -0700 (PDT)
Imam Tashdid ul Alam <[email protected]> • #1190
Re: Protected
Thu, 08 Sep 2005 13:03:42 +0400
Artem Gr <[email protected]> • #1189
Re: Protected
Thu, 08 Sep 2005 12:38:40 +0400
Artem Gr <[email protected]> • #1188
Re: Protected
Wed, 7 Sep 2005 19:16:48 +0100
James Reeves <[email protected]> • #1187
Protected
Mon, 05 Sep 2005 14:40:09 +0200
Daniel Bonniot <[email protected]> • #1186
Re: Is this a bug?
Fri, 2 Sep 2005 16:12:47 -0500
Tom Kaitchuck <[email protected]> • #1185
[ nice-Feature Requests-1264897 ] Pattern Matching
Sat, 20 Aug 2005 07:45:21 -0700
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1184
[ nice-Feature Requests-1076945 ] source charset encoding option
Sat, 27 Aug 2005 07:05:30 -0700
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1183
Re: Is this a bug?
Fri, 2 Sep 2005 19:39:35 +0100
James Reeves <[email protected]> • #1182
Re: Is this a bug?
Fri, 02 Sep 2005 11:19:27 +0200
Daniel Bonniot <[email protected]> • #1181
Is this a bug?
Thu, 1 Sep 2005 12:08:05 +0100
James Reeves <[email protected]> • #1180
Pattern Matching (RFE)
Tue, 23 Aug 2005 21:24:00 -0700 (PDT)
Imam Tashdid ul Alam <[email protected]> • #1179
Re: Re: Curious about method handling
Sat, 6 Aug 2005 15:29:10 +0100
James Reeves <[email protected]> • #1178
Re: Curious about method handling
Sat, 06 Aug 2005 16:45:45 +0400
Artem Gr <[email protected]> • #1177
Re: Re: Curious about method handling
Sat, 6 Aug 2005 12:30:48 +0100
James Reeves <[email protected]> • #1176
Re: Curious about method handling
Sat, 06 Aug 2005 01:43:56 +0400
Artem Gr <[email protected]> • #1175
Re: Curious about method handling
Sat, 06 Aug 2005 01:43:27 +0400
Artem Gr <[email protected]> • #1174
Re: Re: Curious about method handling
Fri, 5 Aug 2005 21:53:00 +0100
James Reeves <[email protected]> • #1173
Re: Re: Curious about method handling
Fri, 5 Aug 2005 21:28:23 +0100
James Reeves <[email protected]> • #1172
Re: Re: Curious about method handling
Fri, 5 Aug 2005 13:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
Isaac Gouy <[email protected]> • #1171
Re: Curious about method handling
Sat, 06 Aug 2005 00:20:08 +0400
Artem Gr <[email protected]> • #1170
Re: Re: Curious about method handling
Fri, 5 Aug 2005 12:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
Isaac Gouy <[email protected]> • #1169
Re: Curious about method handling
Fri, 05 Aug 2005 21:55:05 +0400
Artem Gr <[email protected]> • #1168
Re: Re: Curious about method handling
Fri, 5 Aug 2005 10:22:41 -0700 (PDT)
Isaac Gouy <[email protected]> • #1167
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.