gmane.comp.lang.perl.fun archive

392 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Fw: Help with regex
Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:04:42 +0400
lev <[email protected]> • #1513
Re: Help with regex
Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
John Douglas Porter <[email protected]> • #1512
Re: Help with regex
Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:24:57 -0700
Michael Running Wolf <[email protected]> • #1511
Re: Fw: Help with regex
Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:23:03 -0400
Adam Turoff <[email protected]> • #1510
Fw: Help with regex
Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:58:17 -0500
[email protected] • #1509
Re: Another one-liner?
Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:35:29 +0200
"Philippe Bruhat (BooK)" <[email protected]> • #1508
Re: Interpolated code blocks may not create lexicals
Mon, 29 Sep 2008 08:01:54 -0400
Ryan Yagatich <[email protected]> • #1506
Re: Interpolated code blocks may not create lexicals
Mon, 29 Sep 2008 01:07:01 +0200
"Richard Hartmann" <[email protected]> • #1505
Re: Interpolated code blocks may not create lexicals
Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:04:38 -0400
Michael G Schwern <[email protected]> • #1504
Re: Interpolated code blocks may not create lexicals
Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:08:21 -0500
"David Nicol" <[email protected]> • #1503
Re: YN golf
Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:25:54 +0200 (CEST)
shmem <[email protected]> • #1502
RE: YN golf
Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:37:02 +0100
"Allen, Greg" <[email protected]> • #1501
Re: YN golf
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:17:07 -0700
"John W. Krahn" <[email protected]> • #1500
Re: YN golf
Tue, 1 Apr 2008 09:10:27 +0200
"Philippe Bruhat (BooK)" <[email protected]> • #1499
Re: YN golf
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:37:05 -0500
Chris Dolan <[email protected]> • #1498
Re: YN golf
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:22:08 -0700
Zed Lopez <[email protected]> • #1497
Re: [spam?] YN golf
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:12:12 -0700
"Josh Goldberg" <[email protected]> • #1496
Re: YN golf
Tue, 1 Apr 2008 01:54:40 +0200
"Philippe Bruhat (BooK)" <[email protected]> • #1495
Re: YN golf
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:34:58 -0700
Rick Klement <[email protected]> • #1494
YN golf
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:50:24 -0500
Uri Guttman <[email protected]> • #1493
Re: Name the secret operator
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:31:47 -0700
Michael G Schwern <[email protected]> • #1492
Name the secret operator
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:28:25 +0100
"Philippe Bruhat (BooK)" <[email protected]> • #1491
Re: regex of the month (decade?)
Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:02:00 -0600
"Craig S. Cottingham" <[email protected]> • #1490
Re: regex of the month (decade?)
Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:29:27 +0000
Peter Makholm <[email protected]> • #1489
Re: Umlaut
Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:47:30 +0100
David Landgren <[email protected]> • #1488
Re: regex of the month (decade?)
Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:42:08 +0100
David Landgren <[email protected]> • #1487
Re: Umlaut
Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:15:13 +0100
Paul Johnson <[email protected]> • #1486
Re: Umlaut
Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:16:42 +0100 (CET)
Georg Moritz <[email protected]> • #1485
Re: Umlaut
Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:16:23 -0500
Keith Ivey <[email protected]> • #1484
Re: Umlaut
Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:21:56 +0000
sebb <[email protected]> • #1483
Re: Umlaut
Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:12:06 -0800 (PST)
John Douglas Porter <[email protected]> • #1482
Re: regex of the month (decade?)
Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:15:52 -0500
Yanick Champoux <[email protected]> • #1481
Re: Umlaut
Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:53:56 -0500
Yanick Champoux <[email protected]> • #1480
Re: regex of the month (decade?)
Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:16:21 -0800
Michael G Schwern <[email protected]> • #1479
Re: regex of the month (decade?)
Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:12:22 +0100
Eugene van der Pijll <[email protected]> • #1478
Re: regex of the month (decade?)
Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:21:36 +0100
Aristotle Pagaltzis <[email protected]> • #1477
Re: regex of the month (decade?)
Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:05:06 -0500
Keith Ivey <[email protected]> • #1476
Re: regex of the month (decade?)
Sat, 12 Jan 2008 23:44:48 +0000
Dave Mitchell <[email protected]> • #1475
Umlaut (was: Re: regex of the month (decade?))
Sun, 13 Jan 2008 00:50:11 +0100 (CET)
Georg Moritz <[email protected]> • #1474
Re: regex of the month (decade?)
Sun, 13 Jan 2008 00:23:35 +0100 (CET)
Georg Moritz <[email protected]> • #1473
Re: regex of the month (decade?)
Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:50:52 -0500
Yanick Champoux <[email protected]> • #1472
Re: regex of the month (decade?)
Sat, 12 Jan 2008 16:51:05 -0600
Chris Dolan <[email protected]> • #1471
Re: regex of the month (decade?)
Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:01:58 +0100
David Landgren <[email protected]> • #1470
Re: regex of the month (decade?)
Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:50:26 -0800
Michael G Schwern <[email protected]> • #1469
Re: regex of the month (decade?)
Fri, 11 Jan 2008 03:32:19 +0100
Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni <[email protected]> • #1468
Re: regex of the month (decade?)
Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:08:50 +0100
David Landgren <[email protected]> • #1467
RE: regex of the month (decade?)
Tue, 8 Jan 2008 11:25:05 -0500
"Stoll, Steven R." <[email protected]> • #1466
Re: regex of the month (decade?)
Tue, 08 Jan 2008 10:26:40 -0500
Keith Ivey <[email protected]> • #1465
RE: regex of the month (decade?)
Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:59:04 -0500
"Stoll, Steven R." <[email protected]> • #1464
RE: regex of the month (decade?)
Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:40:24 -0800
"Meryll Larkin" <[email protected]> • #1463
Re: regex of the month (decade?)
Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:33:43 -0500
Uri Guttman <[email protected]> • #1462
Re: regex of the month (decade?)
Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:26:22 -0500
Keith Ivey <[email protected]> • #1461
Re: regex of the month (decade?)
Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:52:04 -0500
"Dan Collins" <[email protected]> • #1460
Re: regex of the month (decade?)
Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:51:56 -0600
"Thomas L. Shinnick" <[email protected]> • #1459
Re: regex of the month (decade?)
07 Jan 2008 23:43:16 +0100
Dmitry Karasik <[email protected]> • #1458
regex of the month (decade?)
Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:06:02 -0500
Uri Guttman <[email protected]> • #1457
Re: AW: bad code to good golf
Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:24:17 -0800
Michael G Schwern <[email protected]> • #1456
Re: bad code to good golf
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:40:55 +0100 (CET)
shmem <[email protected]> • #1455
Re: AW: bad code to good golf
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:46:24 -0500
Uri Guttman <[email protected]> • #1454
AW: bad code to good golf
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:47:40 +0100
Winter Christian <[email protected]> • #1453
Re: bad code to good golf
Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:57:45 -0800
"Steve Fink" <[email protected]> • #1452
Re: bad code to good golf
Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:56:47 -0500
Uri Guttman <[email protected]> • #1451
Re: bad code to good golf
Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:41:46 +0100
"A. Pagaltzis" <[email protected]> • #1450
Re: bad code to good golf
Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:53:10 +0100 (CET)
shmem <[email protected]> • #1449
Re: bad code to good golf
Sun, 09 Dec 2007 19:42:59 -0500
Uri Guttman <[email protected]> • #1448
Re: bad code to good golf
Sun, 09 Dec 2007 15:54:12 -0800
Michael G Schwern <[email protected]> • #1447
Re: bad code to good golf
Sun, 09 Dec 2007 15:47:53 -0800
Michael G Schwern <[email protected]> • #1446
Re: bad code to good golf
Sun, 9 Dec 2007 22:00:10 +0100
"A. Pagaltzis" <[email protected]> • #1445
Re: bad code to good golf
Sun, 9 Dec 2007 21:50:01 +0100
"A. Pagaltzis" <[email protected]> • #1444
Re: bad code to good golf
Sun, 9 Dec 2007 21:15:50 +0100
Marcus Holland-Moritz <[email protected]> • #1443
Re: bad code to good golf
Sun, 09 Dec 2007 13:39:28 -0500
Uri Guttman <[email protected]> • #1442
Re: bad code to good golf
Sun, 09 Dec 2007 13:23:11 -0500
Uri Guttman <[email protected]> • #1441
Re: bad code to good golf
Sun, 9 Dec 2007 05:24:26 -0500
robert wilson <[email protected]> • #1440
Re: bad code to good golf
Sun, 9 Dec 2007 10:53:48 +0100
Marcus Holland-Moritz <[email protected]> • #1439
Re: bad code to good golf
Sun, 09 Dec 2007 00:28:08 -0800
Michael G Schwern <[email protected]> • #1438
bad code to good golf
Sun, 09 Dec 2007 01:43:09 -0500
Uri Guttman <[email protected]> • #1437
Re: Fun with Boggle
Fri, 7 Dec 2007 00:12:16 -0600
Chris Dolan <[email protected]> • #1436
Fun with Boggle
Thu, 6 Dec 2007 09:44:17 -0800
Brad Greenlee <[email protected]> • #1435
Re: The "flaming X-wing" secret operator
Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:17:47 -0500
Yanick Champoux <[email protected]> • #1434
Re: new "!"-based secret operators
Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:36:19 +0100 (CET)
Georg Moritz <[email protected]> • #1433
Re: new "!"-based secret operators
Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:02:00 -0500
Uri Guttman <[email protected]> • #1432
Re: new "!"-based secret operators
30 Nov 2007 18:47:33 +0100
Dmitry Karasik <[email protected]> • #1431
Re: new "!"-based secret operators
Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:27:01 -0500
Keith Ivey <[email protected]> • #1430
Re: new "!"-based secret operators
Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:57:37 -0500
Uri Guttman <[email protected]> • #1429
Re: The "flaming X-wing" secret operator
Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:43:36 +0100
"Philippe Bruhat (BooK)" <[email protected]> • #1428
Re: The "flaming X-wing" secret operator
Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:51:06 +0100
"Philippe Bruhat (BooK)" <[email protected]> • #1427
new "!"-based secret operators
Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:27:02 +0100
Dmitry Karasik <[email protected]> • #1426
Re: The "flaming X-wing" secret operator
Fri, 30 Nov 2007 06:48:18 +0100 (CET)
shmem <[email protected]> • #1425
Re: The "flaming X-wing" secret operator
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:01:45 -0500
Yanick Champoux <[email protected]> • #1424
Re: hashes over easy
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:15:44 -0500
Uri Guttman <[email protected]> • #1423
Re: hashes over easy
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:58:00 -0700 (MST)
Doug Hunt <[email protected]> • #1422
Re: The "flaming X-wing" secret operator (moon 2)
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:21:31 +0100 (CET)
Georg Moritz <[email protected]> • #1421
Re: The "flaming X-wing" secret operator
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:08:22 +0100 (CET)
shmem <[email protected]> • #1420
Re: The "flaming X-wing" secret operator
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:09:28 +0100
Paul Johnson <[email protected]> • #1419
Re: The "flaming X-wing" secret operator
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:30:41 -0500
[email protected] • #1418
Re: The "flaming X-wing" secret operator
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:11:44 -0500
[email protected] • #1417
Re: The "flaming X-wing" secret operator
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:32:31 +0100
"Philippe Bruhat (BooK)" <[email protected]> • #1416
Re: The "flaming X-wing" secret operator
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:20:20 -0500
"Mr. Shawn H. Corey" <[email protected]> • #1415
Re: The "flaming X-wing" secret operator
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:44:53 +0100
"Philippe Bruhat (BooK)" <[email protected]> • #1414
Re: The "flaming X-wing" secret operator
29 Nov 2007 13:09:20 +0100
Dmitry Karasik <[email protected]> • #1413
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.