gmane.comp.lang.perl.golf archive

381 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Hospelian Arabic to Roman Transform (HART) shortened
Wed, 02 Jan 2013 16:25:59 -0500
Yanick Champoux <[email protected]> • #973
Hospelian Arabic to Roman Transform (HART) shortened
Mon, 24 Dec 2012 23:04:21 -0800 (PST)
Andrew Savige <[email protected]> • #972
New Golf Server - http://golf.shinh.org/
Mon, 26 Dec 2011 11:13:48 +0200
Shlomi Fish <[email protected]> • #971
Re: New series of articles on Code Golf
Wed, 18 May 2011 14:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
Andrew Savige <[email protected]> • #970
Re: New series of articles on Code Golf
Wed, 18 May 2011 16:36:56 +0100
Jasper <[email protected]> • #969
Re: New series of articles on Code Golf
Fri, 13 May 2011 23:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
Andrew Savige <[email protected]> • #968
Re: New series of articles on Code Golf
Sat, 2 Jan 2010 11:42:44 -0800 (PST)
Andrew Savige <[email protected]> • #967
Re: anyone have any ideas on how to shorten this?
Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:37:50 -0700
"John W. Krahn" <[email protected]> • #966
Re: anyone have any ideas on how to shorten this?
Fri, 9 Oct 2009 16:16:19 -0700
Jasvir Nagra <[email protected]> • #965
Re: anyone have any ideas on how to shorten this?
Fri, 9 Oct 2009 18:05:59 -0500
Eric Waguespack <[email protected]> • #964
Re: anyone have any ideas on how to shorten this?
Fri, 9 Oct 2009 16:02:46 -0700
Jasvir Nagra <[email protected]> • #963
anyone have any ideas on how to shorten this?
Fri, 9 Oct 2009 16:58:42 -0500
Eric Waguespack <[email protected]> • #962
Re: Another one-liner?
Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:53:20 -0400
[email protected] • #961
Re: Another one-liner?
Wed, 24 Jun 2009 22:14:04 +0000 (GMT)
Phil Carmody <[email protected]> • #960
Re: Another one-liner?
Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:35:29 +0200
"Philippe Bruhat (BooK)" <[email protected]> • #959
Re: Another one-liner?
Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:38:06 +0200
Daniel Tiefnig <[email protected]> • #958
Re: Another one-liner?
Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:01:50 +0200
Daniel Tiefnig <[email protected]> • #957
Re: Another one-liner?
Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:43:32 +0200
Daniel Tiefnig <[email protected]> • #956
Re: Another one-liner?
Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:59:41 +0200
Eirik Berg Hanssen <[email protected]> • #955
Re: Another one-liner?
Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:51:07 -0400
[email protected] • #954
Re: Another one-liner?
Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:26:05 +0100
Jasper <[email protected]> • #953
Re: Another one-liner?
Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:04:55 +0200
Daniel Tiefnig <[email protected]> • #952
Another one-liner?
Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:02:33 +0000 (GMT)
Phil Carmody <[email protected]> • #951
Re: New series of articles on Code Golf
Mon, 11 May 2009 04:15:16 -0700 (PDT)
Andrew Savige <[email protected]> • #950
Re: New series of articles on Code Golf
Mon, 11 May 2009 03:53:26 -0700 (PDT)
Andrew Savige <[email protected]> • #949
Re: New series of articles on Code Golf
Sun, 10 May 2009 20:16:45 -0400
Yanick Champoux <[email protected]> • #948
Re: New series of articles on Code Golf
Sun, 10 May 2009 09:37:36 +0100
Jasper <[email protected]> • #947
New series of articles on Code Golf
Sun, 10 May 2009 00:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
Andrew Savige <[email protected]> • #946
Re: In these times of economic crisis...
Sun, 26 Apr 2009 05:46:01 -0400
robert wilson <[email protected]> • #945
Re: In these times of economic crisis...
Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:35:56 +0100
Jasper <[email protected]> • #944
Re: In these times of economic crisis...
Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:08:13 +0000 (GMT)
Phil Carmody <[email protected]> • #943
In these times of economic crisis...
Sun, 26 Apr 2009 08:18:45 +0000 (GMT)
Phil Carmody <[email protected]> • #942
scrabble word scorer
Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:44:04 +0100
Jasper <[email protected]> • #941
Re: 答复: A challenge to explain the str ange results (under linux)
Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:15:29 +0200
Daniel Tiefnig <[email protected]> • #940
答复: A challenge to explain the strange results (under linux)
Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:29:59 +0800
"Zhu Shanshan" <[email protected]> • #939
Re: A challenge to explain the strange results (under linux)
Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:28:20 -0400
Ronald J Kimball <[email protected]> • #938
A challenge to explain the strange results (under linux)
Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:59:44 +0800
"Zhu Shanshan" <[email protected]> • #937
Re: google's challenges
Fri, 30 May 2008 10:07:00 +0100
Jasper <[email protected]> • #936
Re: google's challenges
Thu, 29 May 2008 16:29:08 -0700
[email protected] (Randal L. Schwartz) • #935
Re: google's challenges
Tue, 27 May 2008 14:27:01 +0200
Bram <[email protected]> • #934
Re: google's challenges
Tue, 27 May 2008 14:15:32 +0100
Jasper <[email protected]> • #933
google's challenges
Tue, 27 May 2008 12:27:54 +0100
Jasper <[email protected]> • #932
Re: Just chipping in...
Mon, 19 May 2008 16:59:36 +0100
Jasper <[email protected]> • #931
Re: Upcoming event
Mon, 14 Apr 2008 01:55:34 -0400 (EDT)
Peter Johncke <[email protected]> • #930
Re: Just chipping in...
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:27:23 +0100
Jasper <[email protected]> • #929
Re: Just chipping in...
Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:16:56 +0000
Jasper <[email protected]> • #928
Re: Just chipping in...
Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:17:48 +0100
Daniel Tiefnig <[email protected]> • #927
Re: Just chipping in...
Fri, 23 Nov 2007 12:02:49 +0000
Jasper <[email protected]> • #926
Re: Just chipping in...
Tue, 20 Nov 2007 21:24:29 +0200
"Tuomo Salo" <[email protected]> • #925
Re: Just chipping in...
Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:55:03 +0200
Tuomo Salo <[email protected]> • #924
Re: Just chipping in...
20 Nov 2007 07:06:00 +0200
Juho Snellman <[email protected]> • #923
Re: Just chipping in...
Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:44:51 -0800 (PST)
Phil Carmody <[email protected]> • #922
Re: Just chipping in...
Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:52:52 +0200
Tuomo Salo <[email protected]> • #921
Re: Just chipping in...
Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:46:49 +0000
Jasper <[email protected]> • #920
Re: Just chipping in...
Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:45:17 +0000
Jasper <[email protected]> • #919
Re: Just chipping in...
Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:02:46 +0100
"Jasvir Nagra" <[email protected]> • #918
Re: Just chipping in...
Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:09:22 +0000
Jasper <[email protected]> • #917
Re: Just chipping in...
Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:05:14 +0000
Jasper <[email protected]> • #916
Re: Just chipping in...
Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:50:01 +0000
Jasper <[email protected]> • #915
Just chipping in...
Thu, 15 Nov 2007 05:05:41 -0800 (PST)
Phil Carmody <[email protected]> • #914
(polish) golfs archive
Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:14:05 +0100
Jasper <[email protected]> • #913
Re: regexp quickie
Thu, 28 Jun 2007 03:52:41 -0700 (PDT)
Phil Carmody <[email protected]> • #912
Re: regexp quickie
Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:29:43 +0300
Shlomi Fish <[email protected]> • #911
RE: regexp quickie
Wed, 27 Jun 2007 15:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
Phil Carmody <[email protected]> • #910
RE: regexp quickie
Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:48:39 -0500
<[email protected]> • #909
Re: regexp quickie
Wed, 27 Jun 2007 15:38:21 -0400
Ronald J Kimball <[email protected]> • #908
RE: regexp quickie
Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:26:35 -0500
<[email protected]> • #907
Re: regexp quickie
Wed, 27 Jun 2007 09:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
Phil Carmody <[email protected]> • #906
Re: regexp quickie
Wed, 27 Jun 2007 11:01:36 -0400
Ronald J Kimball <[email protected]> • #905
regexp quickie
Wed, 27 Jun 2007 05:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
Phil Carmody <[email protected]> • #904
Re: New Golf
Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:15:25 -0500
Yanick Champoux <[email protected]> • #903
Re: New Golf
Mon, 12 Feb 2007 06:17:42 +1100 (EST)
Andrew Savige <[email protected]> • #902
Re: New Golf
Sun, 4 Feb 2007 14:21:45 -0500
Yanick Champoux <[email protected]> • #901
Re: New Golf
Sun, 4 Feb 2007 13:22:49 +1100 (EST)
Andrew Savige <[email protected]> • #900
samy in the news?
Fri, 2 Feb 2007 11:14:16 +0000
Jasper <[email protected]> • #899
Re: New Golf
Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:44:02 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (Ton Hospel) • #898
Re: New Golf
Thu, 18 Jan 2007 07:35:38 +1100 (EST)
Andrew Savige <[email protected]> • #897
Re: New Golf
Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:17:03 +0000
Jasper <[email protected]> • #896
Re: New Golf
Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:04:37 +0100
Daniel Cutter <[email protected]> • #895
Re: simple golf for fun
Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:53:15 -0500
Ronald J Kimball <[email protected]> • #894
Re: simple golf for fun
Wed, 17 Jan 2007 05:54:26 -0800 (PST)
Phil Carmody <[email protected]> • #893
Re: simple golf for fun
Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:09:30 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (Ton Hospel) • #892
Re: simple golf for fun
Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:47:46 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (Ton Hospel) • #891
Re: simple golf for fun
Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:16:30 +0100
Daniel Tiefnig <[email protected]> • #890
Re: simple golf for fun
Wed, 17 Jan 2007 04:13:22 -0800 (PST)
Phil Carmody <[email protected]> • #889
Re: simple golf for fun
17 Jan 2007 13:25:20 +0200
Juho Snellman <[email protected]> • #888
Re: simple golf for fun
Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:59:37 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (Ton Hospel) • #887
Re: simple golf for fun
Wed, 17 Jan 2007 01:47:32 -0800 (PST)
Phil Carmody <[email protected]> • #886
Re: simple golf for fun
Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:08:59 -0500
Ronald J Kimball <[email protected]> • #885
Re: simple golf for fun
Tue, 16 Jan 2007 16:59:51 -0800 (PST)
Phil Carmody <[email protected]> • #884
Re: simple golf for fun
16 Jan 2007 22:51:42 +0200
Juho Snellman <[email protected]> • #883
Re: simple golf for fun
Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:16:06 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (Ton Hospel) • #882
Re: simple golf for fun
Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:00:03 -0800 (PST)
Phil Carmody <[email protected]> • #881
Re: simple golf for fun
Tue, 16 Jan 2007 18:47:11 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (Ton Hospel) • #880
Re: simple golf for fun
Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:44:02 -0500 (EST)
"Yanick Champoux" <[email protected]> • #879
Re: simple golf for fun
Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:42:02 -0500 (EST)
"Yanick Champoux" <[email protected]> • #878
Re: New Golf
Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:17:35 -0600
[email protected] • #877
simple golf for fun
Tue, 16 Jan 2007 06:19:38 -0800 (PST)
Phil Carmody <[email protected]> • #876
Re: New Golf
Mon, 15 Jan 2007 22:55:51 -0500
Yanick Champoux <[email protected]> • #875
Re: New Golf
Sun, 14 Jan 2007 16:31:22 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (Ton Hospel) • #874
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.