gmane.comp.lang.perl.quality-assurance archive

360 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: TPF Devel::Cover grant report May 2013
Sun, 01 Sep 2013 01:34:03 +0200
"Christian Walde" <[email protected]> • #12035
TPF Devel::Cover grant report August 2013
Sun, 1 Sep 2013 01:02:48 +0200
Paul Johnson <[email protected]> • #12034
TPF Devel::Cover grant report July 2013
Sun, 1 Sep 2013 01:01:09 +0200
Paul Johnson <[email protected]> • #12033
TPF Devel::Cover grant report June 2013
Sun, 1 Sep 2013 00:59:11 +0200
Paul Johnson <[email protected]> • #12032
Re: QA for Perl
Fri, 2 Aug 2013 11:08:09 +0100
Nicholas Clark <[email protected]> • #12031
RE: QA for Perl
Wed, 31 Jul 2013 21:41:59 +0000
Tracy Radel <[email protected]> • #12030
Re: QA for Perl
Wed, 31 Jul 2013 22:38:15 +0100
David Cantrell <[email protected]> • #12029
Re: QA for Perl
Wed, 31 Jul 2013 23:27:44 +0200
Olof Johansson <[email protected]> • #12028
Re: QA for Perl
Wed, 31 Jul 2013 23:22:59 +0200
Leon Timmermans <[email protected]> • #12027
Re: QA for Perl
Wed, 31 Jul 2013 17:15:50 -0400
Dag Rowe <[email protected]> • #12026
RE: QA for Perl
Wed, 31 Jul 2013 20:46:53 +0000
Tracy Radel <[email protected]> • #12025
Re: QA for Perl
Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:19:52 -0400
Dag Rowe <[email protected]> • #12024
Re: QA for Perl
Wed, 31 Jul 2013 19:49:08 +0300
Shlomi Fish <[email protected]> • #12023
QA for Perl
Wed, 31 Jul 2013 15:29:18 +0000
Tracy Radel <[email protected]> • #12022
CPAN::Changes::Spec
Tue, 23 Jul 2013 19:19:44 +0200
Lars Dɪᴇᴄᴋᴏᴡ 迪拉斯 <[email protected]> • #12021
Re: TAP::Harness and -w
Sun, 7 Jul 2013 19:26:25 +0200
Leon Timmermans <[email protected]> • #12020
Re: TAP::Harness and -w
Sun, 7 Jul 2013 09:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
Ovid <[email protected]> • #12019
Re: TAP::Harness and -w
Sun, 7 Jul 2013 08:11:36 -0700
Karen Etheridge <[email protected]> • #12018
Re: TAP::Harness and -w
Sun, 7 Jul 2013 02:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
Ovid <[email protected]> • #12017
TAP::Parser::Multiplexer isn't parallel on Windows, solutions?
Sat, 6 Jul 2013 18:28:45 -0400
bulk88 <[email protected]> • #12016
Re: TAP::Harness and -w
Thu, 4 Jul 2013 18:11:12 -0400
Ricardo Signes <[email protected]> • #12015
Re: TAP::Harness and -w
Thu, 4 Jul 2013 14:33:45 -0700
Eric Wilhelm <[email protected]> • #12014
Re: TAP::Harness and -w
Thu, 4 Jul 2013 16:44:34 -0400
Ricardo Signes <[email protected]> • #12013
Re: TAP::Harness and -w
Thu, 4 Jul 2013 20:04:21 +0200
Leon Timmermans <[email protected]> • #12012
TAP::Harness and -w
Tue, 2 Jul 2013 14:51:11 -0400
Ricardo Signes <[email protected]> • #12011
Re: TPF Devel::Cover grant report May 2013
Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:52:00 -0400
Ricardo Signes <[email protected]> • #12010
TPF Devel::Cover grant report May 2013
Mon, 24 Jun 2013 00:43:41 +0200
Paul Johnson <[email protected]> • #12009
Re: How might we mark a test suite isn't parallalizable?
Wed, 29 May 2013 10:00:48 -0400
Mark Stosberg <[email protected]> • #12008
Re: How might we mark a test suite isn't parallalizable?
Tue, 7 May 2013 11:05:52 -0700
Buddy Burden <[email protected]> • #12007
Re: How might we mark a test suite isn't parallalizable?
Tue, 7 May 2013 15:17:17 +0100
David Cantrell <[email protected]> • #12006
Re: How might we mark a test suite isn't parallalizable?
Mon, 6 May 2013 13:37:31 -0700
Buddy Burden <[email protected]> • #12005
Re: How might we mark a test suite isn't parallalizable?
Mon, 6 May 2013 12:15:23 +0200
Lasse Makholm <[email protected]> • #12004
Re: How might we mark a test suite isn't parallalizable?
Sun, 5 May 2013 23:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
Ovid <[email protected]> • #12003
Re: How might we mark a test suite isn't parallalizable?
Sun, 5 May 2013 07:07:08 -0400
yary <[email protected]> • #12002
Re: TPF Devel::Cover grant report April 2013
Sat, 4 May 2013 17:40:04 -0400
Ricardo Signes <[email protected]> • #12001
Re: TPF Devel::Cover grant report March 2013
Sat, 4 May 2013 17:37:52 -0400
Ricardo Signes <[email protected]> • #12000
Re: How might we mark a test suite isn't parallalizable?
Sat, 4 May 2013 13:37:38 -0700
Buddy Burden <[email protected]> • #11999
Re: Re: How might we mark a test suite isn't parallalizable?
Fri, 03 May 2013 13:40:24 -0700
chromatic <[email protected]> • #11998
Re: How might we mark a test suite isn't parallalizable?
Fri, 3 May 2013 13:34:35 -0700 (PDT)
Ovid <[email protected]> • #11997
Re: How might we mark a test suite isn't parallalizable?
Fri, 03 May 2013 11:48:19 -0400
Mark Stosberg <[email protected]> • #11996
Re: How might we mark a test suite isn't parallalizable?
Fri, 3 May 2013 16:34:44 +0100
David Cantrell <[email protected]> • #11995
Re: TPF Devel::Cover grant report March 2013
Fri, 03 May 2013 10:32:38 -0500
"Michael G. Schwern" <[email protected]> • #11994
Re: How might we mark a test suite isn't parallalizable?
Fri, 03 May 2013 11:03:28 -0400
Mark Stosberg <[email protected]> • #11993
Re: How might we mark a test suite isn't parallalizable?
Fri, 3 May 2013 15:35:07 +0200
Leon Timmermans <[email protected]> • #11992
Re: How might we mark a test suite isn't parallalizable?
Fri, 3 May 2013 13:17:12 +0100
David Cantrell <[email protected]> • #11991
Re: TPF Devel::Cover grant report April 2013
Fri, 03 May 2013 13:30:04 +0200
"Christian Walde" <[email protected]> • #11990
Re: TPF Devel::Cover grant report March 2013
Fri, 03 May 2013 13:11:23 +0200
"Christian Walde" <[email protected]> • #11989
Re: How might we mark a test suite isn't parallalizable?
Fri, 3 May 2013 11:02:16 +0200
Olivier Mengué <[email protected]> • #11988
TPF Devel::Cover grant report March 2013
Wed, 1 May 2013 22:38:26 +0200
Paul Johnson <[email protected]> • #11987
TPF Devel::Cover grant report April 2013
Wed, 1 May 2013 22:40:17 +0200
Paul Johnson <[email protected]> • #11986
Re: How might we mark a test suite isn't parallalizable?
Thu, 2 May 2013 22:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
Ovid <[email protected]> • #11985
Re: How might we mark a test suite isn't parallalizable?
Thu, 02 May 2013 16:01:23 -0400
Mark Stosberg <[email protected]> • #11984
Re: How might we mark a test suite isn't parallalizable?
Thu, 02 May 2013 15:51:11 -0400
Mark Stosberg <[email protected]> • #11983
Re: How might we mark a test suite isn't parallalizable?
Thu, 2 May 2013 12:51:06 -0700
Karen Etheridge <[email protected]> • #11982
How might we mark a test suite isn't parallalizable?
Thu, 02 May 2013 14:39:13 -0500
brian d foy <[email protected]> • #11981
Re: Smoke Test::More 0.98_05 please.
Sat, 27 Apr 2013 21:49:21 -0400
Ricardo Signes <[email protected]> • #11980
Re: Smoke Test::More 0.98_05 please.
Sun, 28 Apr 2013 01:09:09 +0100
Adrian Howard <[email protected]> • #11979
Re: Smoke Test::More 0.98_05 please.
Sat, 27 Apr 2013 16:32:10 -0700
"Michael G. Schwern" <[email protected]> • #11978
Re: Smoke Test::More 0.98_05 please.
Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:41:16 -0700
Karen Etheridge <[email protected]> • #11977
Re: Smoke Test::More 0.98_05 please.
Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:22:31 -0700
"Michael G. Schwern" <[email protected]> • #11976
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.