gmane.comp.lib.libtai archive

356 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: http://cr.yp.to/libtai.html out of date?
Sat, 28 Jan 2017 00:26:36 -0500
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #372
PayPal auto-responding to emails to this list?
Tue, 10 Jan 2017 16:16:52 +1300
Tim Makarios <[email protected]> • #371
Re: http://cr.yp.to/libtai.html out of date?
Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:01:36 +1300
Tim Makarios <[email protected]> • #370
Re: http://cr.yp.to/libtai.html out of date?
6 Jan 2017 19:36:33 -0700
"Andy Bradford" <[email protected]> • #369
http://cr.yp.to/libtai.html out of date?
Fri, 06 Jan 2017 12:32:35 +1300
Tim Makarios <[email protected]> • #368
Re: will libtai's leap-second table be updated?
Fri, 3 Aug 2012 15:55:05 -0400
Brian Reichert <[email protected]> • #367
Re: will libtai's leap-second table be updated?
3 Aug 2012 06:28:10 -0000
"D. J. Bernstein" <[email protected]> • #366
Re: will libtai's leap-second table be updated?
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 16:05:11 -0500
Paul Sheer <[email protected]> • #365
Re: will libtai's leap-second table be updated?
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 13:51:45 -0700
Toby Betts <[email protected]> • #364
Re: will libtai's leap-second table be updated?
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:20:52 -0400
Brian Reichert <[email protected]> • #363
Re: will libtai's leap-second table be updated?
Thu, 02 Aug 2012 15:19:10 -0400
"Michael T. Babcock" <[email protected]> • #362
will libtai's leap-second table be updated?
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 13:53:01 -0400
Brian Reichert <[email protected]> • #361
Re: What is the license for "clockspeed" ?
Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:43:57 -0600
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #360
What is the license for "clockspeed" ?
Wed, 07 Dec 2011 13:49:12 +0100
<[email protected]> • #359
Re: Seeking clarifaction of tai64nlocal and leap seconds
Fri, 1 Apr 2011 15:19:05 -0400
Brian Reichert <[email protected]> • #358
Re: Seeking clarifaction of tai64nlocal and leap seconds
Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:10:26 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #357
RDTSC reliable for use by clockspeed?
Fri, 7 Jan 2011 13:11:55 -0600
Paul Sheer <[email protected]> • #356
Re: Question about the taia library interface
Tue, 9 Mar 2010 17:54:47 -0800
"Brian D. Winters" <[email protected]> • #355
Re: This mailing list contains a significant daily intake of SPAM
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:12:59 -0600
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #354
Re: This mailing list contains a significant daily intake of SPAM
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:03:14 -0500
Jay Sullivan <[email protected]> • #353
Re: This mailing list contains a significant daily intake of SPAM
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:17:13 -0600
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #352
This mailing list contains a significant daily intake of SPAM
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:41:06 -0500
Jay Sullivan <[email protected]> • #351
Re: Question about the meaning of tai6464
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:34:52 -0500
Jay Sullivan <[email protected]> • #350
Re: Question about the taia library interface
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:31:57 -0500
Jay Sullivan <[email protected]> • #349
Re: Question about the taia library interface
Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:44:02 -0600
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #348
Re: Question about the taia library interface
Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:06:27 -0500
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #347
Re: Question about the taia library interface
Tue, 9 Mar 2010 22:09:35 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #346
Re: Question about the taia library interface
Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:16:06 +0100
Bernhard Graf <[email protected]> • #345
Re: Question about the meaning of tai6464
Tue, 9 Mar 2010 14:52:49 -0500
Jay Sullivan <[email protected]> • #344
Question about the taia library interface
Tue, 9 Mar 2010 14:46:11 -0500
Jay Sullivan <[email protected]> • #343
Re: Question about the meaning of tai6464
Tue, 9 Mar 2010 18:55:04 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #342
Re: Question about the meaning of tai6464
Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:21:05 +0100
Bernhard Graf <[email protected]> • #341
Question about the meaning of tai6464
Tue, 9 Mar 2010 12:02:23 -0500
Jay Sullivan <[email protected]> • #340
Clockspeed and NTP
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:43:53 -0800
Michael Puckett <[email protected]> • #339
Shared Library?
Thu, 14 May 2009 16:12:27 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #338
Re: Algorithm to exploit 32 bit time functions to do time zone calculations
Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:21:15 -0700
Michael G Schwern <[email protected]> • #337
Re: Algorithm to exploit 32 bit time functions to do time zone calculations
Wed, 17 Sep 2008 23:15:01 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #336
Re: Algorithm to exploit 32 bit time functions to do time zone calculations
Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:00:03 -0700
Michael G Schwern <[email protected]> • #335
Re: Algorithm to exploit 32 bit time functions to do time zone calculations
Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:21:18 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #334
Re: Algorithm to exploit 32 bit time functions to do time zone calculations
Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:03:19 -0700
Michael G Schwern <[email protected]> • #333
Re: Algorithm to exploit 32 bit time functions to do time zone calculations
Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:01:11 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #332
Re: Algorithm to exploit 32 bit time functions to do time zone calculations
Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:55:45 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #331
Re: Algorithm to exploit 32 bit time functions to do time zone calculations
Wed, 17 Sep 2008 09:28:02 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #330
Re: Algorithm to exploit 32 bit time functions to do time zone calculations
Tue, 16 Sep 2008 18:34:34 -0700
Michael G Schwern <[email protected]> • #329
Re: Algorithm to exploit 32 bit time functions to do time zone calculations
Tue, 16 Sep 2008 21:07:49 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #328
Re: Algorithm to exploit 32 bit time functions to do time zone calculations
Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:09:52 -0700
Michael G Schwern <[email protected]> • #327
Algorithm to exploit 32 bit time functions to do time zone calculations
Mon, 15 Sep 2008 20:57:50 -0700
Michael G Schwern <[email protected]> • #326
subject :)
Thu, 14 Aug 2008 04:41:35 +0000
"alon kuo" <[email protected]> • #325
fatal: unable to init leapsecs
Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:15:32 -0400
Amitai Schlair <[email protected]> • #324
Re: Updated leapsecs.dat
4 Jul 2008 18:37:36 -0700
"Toby Betts" <[email protected]> • #323
Updated leapsecs.dat
Fri, 4 Jul 2008 20:18:14 -0400
Alex Pennace <[email protected]> • #322
Try once and you'll always buy your meds form us.
Mon, 19 May 2008 20:59:38 +0000
"augie hai" <[email protected]> • #321
Satisfy your addiction with these
Mon, 21 Apr 2008 02:23:06 +0300
NARRI <[email protected]> • #320
syensid
Fri, 12 Oct 2007 21:44:55 +0300
"teresa Brunell" <[email protected]> • #319
September 78% OFF
Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:50:09 +0000 (UTC)
VIAGRA ? Official Site <[email protected]> • #318
Re: Licensing of libtai
Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:42:14 +0200
"Randy Adamczyk" <[email protected]> • #317
Licensing of libtai
Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:33:15 +0545
Prabin Dahal <[email protected]> • #316
clockspeed on notebook - clockspeed make clock worse instead (CPU speed changes?)
Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:09:27 +0200
Jiri Navratil <[email protected]> • #315
Re: sntpclock = ntpdate + 22s
Thu, 07 Jun 2007 01:52:57 -0700
johnea <[email protected]> • #314
Re: sntpclock = ntpdate + 22s
Wed, 6 Jun 2007 21:00:04 +0000
Bennett Todd <[email protected]> • #313
Re: sntpclock = ntpdate + 22s
Wed, 06 Jun 2007 16:46:48 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #312
sntpclock = ntpdate + 22s
Wed, 06 Jun 2007 13:11:32 -0700
johnea <[email protected]> • #311
Chappelle Mayer
Tue, 20 Mar 2007 19:32:12 +0100
"Tips" <[email protected]> • #310
questions on clockspeed
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:50:06 -0300
Otavio Exel <[email protected]> • #309
Re: clockspeed do not run continuosly (just finish after start/it's not started/intended for background)
Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:50:07 +0100
Jiri Navratil <[email protected]> • #308
Re: clockspeed do not run continuosly (just finish after start/it's not started/intended for background)
Fri, 19 Jan 2007 01:53:53 -0500
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #307
clockspeed do not run continuosly (just finish after start/it's not started/intended for background)
Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:01:27 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #306
Re: Does anyone know where to find clocksd?
Thu, 23 Nov 2006 18:14:35 +0000 (UTC)
Paul Theodoropoulos <[email protected]> • #305
Re: [Patch] MacOS X support
Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:09:28 -0800
[email protected] • #304
Re: [Patch] MacOS X support
Fri, 3 Feb 2006 22:54:21 +0000
Jose Celestino <[email protected]> • #303
Re: [Patch] MacOS X support
Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:45:22 -0800
[email protected] • #302
[Patch] MacOS X support
Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:44:07 -0800
[email protected] • #301
clockspeed on Linux/amd64: no effect?
Tue, 06 Dec 2005 08:57:21 +0200
Yassen Damyanov <[email protected]> • #300
Re: sntpclock warnings and seldom failures on Gentoo Linux
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:15:29 -0500
Toby Betts <[email protected]> • #299
Re: sntpclock warnings and seldom failures on Gentoo Linux
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:09:33 +0200
Yassen Damyanov <[email protected]> • #298
Re: sntpclock warnings and seldom failures on Gentoo Linux
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:58:49 -0600 (CST)
brian <[email protected]> • #297
Re: sntpclock warnings and seldom failures on Gentoo Linux
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:51:08 -0500
Toby Betts <[email protected]> • #296
sntpclock warnings and seldom failures on Gentoo Linux
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:52:28 +0200
Yassen Damyanov <[email protected]> • #295
Re: Does anyone know where to find clocksd?
Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:28:29 -0500
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #294
Re: Does anyone know where to find clocksd?
Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:19:39 +0100
Luca Morettoni <[email protected]> • #293
Does anyone know where to find clocksd?
Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:31:13 -0500
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #292
Re: Time off by -5 hours
Sat, 5 Nov 2005 10:49:20 +0200
Florin Izvoranu <[email protected]> • #291
Re: Time off by -5 hours
Fri, 4 Nov 2005 11:09:46 -0800 (PST)
email builder <[email protected]> • #290
Re: Time off by -5 hours
Fri, 4 Nov 2005 10:01:12 -0800 (PST)
email builder <[email protected]> • #289
Re: Time off by -5 hours
Fri, 4 Nov 2005 09:35:51 -0700
Ben Mesander <[email protected]> • #288
Re: Time off by -5 hours
Fri, 4 Nov 2005 01:03:34 -0800 (PST)
email builder <[email protected]> • #287
Re: Time off by -5 hours
Thu, 3 Nov 2005 22:29:15 -0800 (PST)
email builder <[email protected]> • #286
Re: Time off by -5 hours
Thu, 3 Nov 2005 21:52:22 -0800 (PST)
email builder <[email protected]> • #285
Time off by -5 hours
Thu, 3 Nov 2005 16:30:51 -0800 (PST)
email builder <[email protected]> • #284
Re: taiclockd without clockspeed (no NTP source available) ?
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:19:14 -0200
Otavio Exel <[email protected]> • #283
Re: taiclockd without clockspeed (no NTP source available) ?
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:36:22 +0200
Marco Molteni <[email protected]> • #282
Re: taiclockd without clockspeed (no NTP source available) ?
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:08:56 +0200
Luca Morettoni <[email protected]> • #281
taiclockd without clockspeed (no NTP source available) ?
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 13:25:10 +0200
Marco Molteni <[email protected]> • #280
Re: crond, hwclock, and clockspeed
Sat, 17 Sep 2005 09:41:32 -0400
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #279
Re: crond, hwclock, and clockspeed
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 17:27:01 -0400
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #278
Re: crond, hwclock, and clockspeed
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:46:29 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #277
Re: crond, hwclock, and clockspeed
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:49:55 -0400
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #276
Re: crond, hwclock, and clockspeed
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:30:10 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #275
Re: crond, hwclock, and clockspeed
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:59:50 -0400
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #274
Re: crond, hwclock, and clockspeed
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:57:33 -0400
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #273
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.