gmane.comp.mathematics.pari.user archive

591 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 6). Latest articles →

Re: What’s the pari/gp function for the Miller’s algorithm ?
Sun, 15 Mar 2026 14:44:36 +0100
Bill Allombert <[email protected]> • #6882
Re: What’s the pari/gp function for the Miller’s algorithm ?
Sun, 15 Mar 2026 14:07:53 +0100
Bill Allombert <[email protected]> • #6881
Re: S-Unit questions
Sat, 14 Mar 2026 15:32:35 +0100
Karim Belabas <[email protected]> • #6880
Re: S-Unit questions
Sat, 14 Mar 2026 10:23:52 -0400
Charles Greathouse <[email protected]> • #6879
Re: S-Unit questions
Sat, 14 Mar 2026 10:38:36 +0100
[email protected] • #6878
Re: S-Unit questions
Thu, 12 Mar 2026 21:56:23 +0100
[email protected] • #6877
Re: S-Unit questions
Thu, 12 Mar 2026 16:09:56 +0100
[email protected] • #6876
Re: S-Unit questions
Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:41:07 +0100
Aurel Page <[email protected]> • #6875
Re: S-Unit questions
Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:36:46 +0100
[email protected] • #6874
Re: S-Unit questions
Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:10:20 +0100
Bill Allombert <[email protected]> • #6873
Re: S-Unit questions
Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:06:17 +0100
[email protected] • #6872
S-Unit questions
Thu, 12 Mar 2026 14:58:16 +0100
[email protected] • #6871
Re: increment slowdown
Tue, 10 Mar 2026 15:30:12 +0100
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #6870
Re: increment slowdown
Tue, 10 Mar 2026 14:58:24 +0100
Bill Allombert <[email protected]> • #6869
increment slowdown
Tue, 10 Mar 2026 14:05:38 +0100
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #6868
Invitation: ad0e2f5c1ac4 confirmation record available for Invoice @ Tue Mar 10, 2026 12:54am (GMT-4) ([email protected])
Mon, 09 Mar 2026 15:54:38 +0000
Melissa Wisniewski <[email protected]> • #6867
Unidentified subject!
Sat, 07 Mar 2026 17:44:53 +0100
[email protected] • #6866
Re: Phantastic performance of writebin()+read() for very large t_VEC
Sat, 7 Mar 2026 16:00:09 +0100
Karim Belabas <[email protected]> • #6865
Phantastic performance of writebin()+read() for very large t_VEC
Sat, 07 Mar 2026 14:48:01 +0100
[email protected] • #6864
Re: Questions on operations on factorizations
Thu, 5 Mar 2026 15:50:33 +0100
Bill Allombert <[email protected]> • #6863
Questions on operations on factorizations
Thu, 05 Mar 2026 15:39:50 +0100
[email protected] • #6862
Re: vecsum a Vecsmall
Sun, 1 Mar 2026 14:47:10 +0100
Bill Allombert <[email protected]> • #6861
Re: vecsum a Vecsmall
Sun, 1 Mar 2026 14:00:06 +0100
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #6860
Re: vecsum a Vecsmall
Sun, 1 Mar 2026 12:24:22 +0100
Bill Allombert <[email protected]> • #6859
vecsum a Vecsmall
Sun, 1 Mar 2026 11:55:33 +0100
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #6858
Re: question on recovering numerical factors from rational polynomials
Fri, 27 Feb 2026 18:30:18 +0100
Bill Allombert <[email protected]> • #6857
question on recovering numerical factors from rational polynomials
Fri, 27 Feb 2026 09:21:52 -0800
American Citizen <[email protected]> • #6856
question on rational varieties and searching for parametric solutions
Wed, 25 Feb 2026 18:18:06 -0800
American Citizen <[email protected]> • #6855
modulear exponentiation performance options: Mod(base, modulus)^exp / gp2c / mpz_powm() / gw_powm()
Tue, 24 Feb 2026 22:18:18 +0100
[email protected] • #6854
Re: Why does factorint() take 128ms for 1853 decimal digit prime, while isprime() takes 16:45min/2min cpu/real time?
Tue, 24 Feb 2026 16:38:11 +0100
[email protected] • #6853
Re: Why does factorint() take 128ms for 1853 decimal digit prime, while isprime() takes 16:45min/2min cpu/real time?
Tue, 24 Feb 2026 14:46:06 +0100
Karim Belabas <[email protected]> • #6852
Re: Why does factorint() take 128ms for 1853 decimal digit prime, while isprime() takes 16:45min/2min cpu/real time?
Tue, 24 Feb 2026 13:55:21 +0100
[email protected] • #6851
Re: Why does factorint() take 128ms for 1853 decimal digit prime, while isprime() takes 16:45min/2min cpu/real time?
Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:24:43 +0100
Aurel Page <[email protected]> • #6850
Why does factorint() take 128ms for 1853 decimal digit prime, while isprime() takes 16:45min/2min cpu/real time?
Mon, 23 Feb 2026 22:25:54 +0100
[email protected] • #6849
Re: Question on factorint matrix modification
Sun, 22 Feb 2026 22:32:03 +0100
[email protected] • #6848
Re: Question on factorint matrix modification
Sun, 22 Feb 2026 22:11:53 +0100
Karim Belabas <[email protected]> • #6847
Question on factorint matrix modification
Sun, 22 Feb 2026 22:03:41 +0100
[email protected] • #6846
Re: question on PARI/GP t_INTMOD exponentiation optimization for multiple similar size big exponents with same base
Mon, 16 Feb 2026 18:41:54 +0100
Bill Allombert <[email protected]> • #6845
question on PARI/GP t_INTMOD exponentiation optimization for multiple similar size big exponents with same base
Mon, 16 Feb 2026 15:49:51 +0100
[email protected] • #6844
Re: Problem with recursive function return value
Sat, 14 Feb 2026 17:52:42 +0100
[email protected] • #6843
Re: Problem with recursive function return value
Sat, 14 Feb 2026 16:30:45 +0100
Bill Allombert <[email protected]> • #6842
Problem with recursive function return value
Sat, 14 Feb 2026 15:54:14 +0100
[email protected] • #6841
New PariDroid release 2.17.3.2.5
Fri, 13 Feb 2026 19:03:05 +0100
Andreas Enge <[email protected]> • #6840
Re: question on recovering a single parameter from a minimal model elliptic curve
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 17:35:47 +0100
Bill Allombert <[email protected]> • #6839
Re: Is short-circuit evaluation possible with parfor() ?
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 17:34:29 +0100
Bill Allombert <[email protected]> • #6838
Re: Is short-circuit evaluation possible with parfor() ?
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 17:13:53 +0100
[email protected] • #6837
Re: Is short-circuit evaluation possible with parfor() ?
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 14:51:23 +0100
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #6836
Re: Is short-circuit evaluation possible with parfor() ?
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 14:18:01 +0100
[email protected] • #6835
Re: Is short-circuit evaluation possible with parfor() ?
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 10:26:13 +0100
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #6834
Re: Is short-circuit evaluation possible with parfor() ?
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 08:58:10 +0100
[email protected] • #6833
Re: Is short-circuit evaluation possible with parfor() ?
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 07:57:48 +0100
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #6832
Re: Is short-circuit evaluation possible with parfor() ?
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 07:23:22 +0100
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #6831
solved my problem
Mon, 9 Feb 2026 20:59:48 -0800
American Citizen <[email protected]> • #6830
question on recovering a single parameter from a minimal model elliptic curve
Mon, 9 Feb 2026 16:50:06 -0800
American Citizen <[email protected]> • #6829
Is short-circuit evaluation possible with parfor() ?
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 00:45:28 +0100
[email protected] • #6828
Denominator and implicit orderings
Sun, 08 Feb 2026 14:43:50 +0100
Ewan Delanoy <[email protected]> • #6827
Re: what's going on here?
Wed, 4 Feb 2026 11:11:37 +0100
Bill Allombert <[email protected]> • #6826
Re: what's going on here?
Wed, 4 Feb 2026 09:08:27 +0000
Chris Wuthrich <[email protected]> • #6825
Re: what's going on here?
Wed, 4 Feb 2026 09:17:12 +0100
Aurel Page <[email protected]> • #6824
what's going on here?
Tue, 3 Feb 2026 15:28:39 -0800
American Citizen <[email protected]> • #6823
Re: Question about parallel execution...
Sat, 31 Jan 2026 11:18:19 +0100
Bill Allombert <[email protected]> • #6822
Question about parallel execution...
Fri, 30 Jan 2026 18:11:31 -0600
David Cleaver <[email protected]> • #6821
Re: A000001, galpol
Sat, 24 Jan 2026 23:09:34 +0100
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #6820
Re: polred and variants
Sat, 24 Jan 2026 15:07:15 +0100
Karim Belabas <[email protected]> • #6819
Re: A000001, galpol
Sat, 24 Jan 2026 13:18:26 +0100
[email protected] • #6818
Re: A000001, galpol
Sat, 24 Jan 2026 11:44:08 +0100
Bill Allombert <[email protected]> • #6817
A000001, galpol
Sat, 24 Jan 2026 11:30:29 +0100
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #6816
Re: PARI/GP wasm64 64-bit version
Fri, 23 Jan 2026 09:00:43 -0800
American Citizen <[email protected]> • #6815
Re: PARI/GP wasm64 64-bit version
Fri, 23 Jan 2026 15:17:16 +0100
[email protected] • #6814
Re: PARI/GP wasm64 64-bit version
Fri, 23 Jan 2026 13:00:25 +0100
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #6813
Re: PARI/GP wasm64 64-bit version
Fri, 23 Jan 2026 12:06:13 +0100
Loïc Grenié <[email protected]> • #6812
PARI/GP wasm64 64-bit version
Fri, 23 Jan 2026 11:58:41 +0100
Bill Allombert <[email protected]> • #6811
Re: polred and variants
Fri, 23 Jan 2026 11:18:21 +0100
Aurel Page <[email protected]> • #6810
Re: polred and variants
Fri, 23 Jan 2026 09:19:33 +0000
John Cremona <[email protected]> • #6809
Re: polred and variants
Thu, 22 Jan 2026 22:42:23 +0100
Bill Allombert <[email protected]> • #6808
Re: polred and variants
Thu, 22 Jan 2026 21:18:59 +0000
John Cremona <[email protected]> • #6807
Re: Computation with two algebraic integers
Thu, 22 Jan 2026 20:16:58 +0100
Bill Allombert <[email protected]> • #6806
Re: Computation with two algebraic integers
Thu, 22 Jan 2026 12:53:39 -0600
Kurt Foster <[email protected]> • #6805
Re: polred and variants
Thu, 22 Jan 2026 18:30:15 +0100
Karim Belabas <[email protected]> • #6804
Re: Computation with two algebraic integers
Thu, 22 Jan 2026 16:47:54 +0100 (CET)
Denis Simon <[email protected]> • #6803
Re: Computation with two algebraic integers
Thu, 22 Jan 2026 16:45:12 +0100 (CET)
Denis Simon <[email protected]> • #6802
Re: Computation with two algebraic integers
Thu, 22 Jan 2026 16:24:57 +0100
Ewan Delanoy <[email protected]> • #6801
polred and variants
Thu, 22 Jan 2026 15:05:04 +0000
John Cremona <[email protected]> • #6800
Re: Computation with two algebraic integers
Thu, 22 Jan 2026 15:17:55 +0100
Bill Allombert <[email protected]> • #6799
Computation with two algebraic integers
Thu, 22 Jan 2026 14:56:58 +0100
Ewan Delanoy <[email protected]> • #6798
Re: Questions on alternative set notations
Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:27:08 +0100
Bill Allombert <[email protected]> • #6797
Questions on alternative set notations
Thu, 15 Jan 2026 00:49:07 +0100
[email protected] • #6796
serconvol(x,y) extensions
Tue, 13 Jan 2026 23:22:38 +0800
"管理员" <[email protected]> • #6795
Re: fibint(n), fibbinary(n)
Mon, 12 Jan 2026 23:31:05 +0100
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #6794
Re: fibint(n), fibbinary(n)
Sun, 11 Jan 2026 23:15:46 +0100
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #6793
Re: fibint(n), fibbinary(n)
Sun, 11 Jan 2026 18:18:38 +0100
Bill Allombert <[email protected]> • #6792
fibint(n), fibbinary(n)
Sun, 11 Jan 2026 17:45:42 +0100
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #6791
Re: isprime() runtime jump between 10^18 and 10^20?
Sat, 10 Jan 2026 17:30:57 +0100
Bill Allombert <[email protected]> • #6790
Re: isprime() runtime jump between 10^18 and 10^20?
Sat, 10 Jan 2026 16:20:18 +0100
[email protected] • #6789
Re: primepi(2^35)
Thu, 8 Jan 2026 10:36:37 -0500
Max Alekseyev <[email protected]> • #6788
Re: parforstep() available, but parsumstep() is missing
Wed, 07 Jan 2026 23:08:17 +0100
[email protected] • #6787
Re: parforstep() available, but parsumstep() is missing
Wed, 07 Jan 2026 22:57:40 +0100
[email protected] • #6786
Re: parforstep() available, but parsumstep() is missing
Wed, 7 Jan 2026 22:14:29 +0100
Bill Allombert <[email protected]> • #6785
Re: parforstep() available, but parsumstep() is missing
Wed, 7 Jan 2026 21:50:23 +0100
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #6784
parforstep() available, but parsumstep() is missing
Wed, 07 Jan 2026 20:31:31 +0100
[email protected] • #6783
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.