gmane.comp.programming.language-of-the-year archive

362 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →

try it
Wed, 10 Aug 2016 11:18:21 +0300
"bjoern.jensen [email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8911
looks nice
Sat, 18 Jun 2016 19:33:24 +0300
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8910
☂ good news
Thu, 2 Jun 2016 13:20:14 +0300
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8909
something new, don't miss up
Sat, 28 May 2016 15:28:53 +0300
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8908
that is not a joke!
Sat, 28 May 2016 15:26:43 +0300
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8907
amazing and exciting
Sat, 28 May 2016 15:26:16 +0300
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8906
Fw: new message
Tue, 12 Apr 2016 02:30:27 +0300
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8905
Fw: new message
Thu, 31 Mar 2016 02:48:48 +0300
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8904
Fw: new message
Thu, 24 Mar 2016 01:54:03 +0300
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8903
Fw: new message
Thu, 24 Mar 2016 01:49:29 +0300
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8902
Fw: new message
Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:17:58 +0300
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8901
Fw: new message
Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:08:57 +0300
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8900
Fw: new message
Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:04:42 +0300
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8899
Fw: new message
Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:03:00 -0800
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8898
Re: Fw: new important message
Wed, 10 Feb 2016 18:34:37 +0100
Dorian Hoxha <[email protected]> • #8897
Fw: new message
Mon, 1 Feb 2016 04:21:33 -0800
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8895
Fw: new message
Mon, 1 Feb 2016 04:21:30 -0800
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8894
Fw: new message
Sun, 24 Jan 2016 15:08:14 -0800
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8893
Fw: new message
Sun, 24 Jan 2016 15:07:58 -0800
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8892
Fw: new message
Wed, 6 Jan 2016 14:49:32 -0800
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8891
Fw: new message
Wed, 6 Jan 2016 14:39:00 -0800
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8890
Re: Fw: new message
Tue, 22 Dec 2015 16:18:14 -0800
"Garry Freemyer garryfre-yBeKhBN/[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8889
Fw: new message
Wed, 23 Dec 2015 02:48:17 -0800
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8888
Re: Should this group be disbanded?
Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:42:57 -0500
"Wesley Reisz [email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8887
Re: Should this group be disbanded?
Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:38:36 -0700
"Gregg Irwin [email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8886
Should this group be disbanded?
Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:57:19 -0500
"Chris Patti [email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8885
Fw: new message
Thu, 10 Dec 2015 18:42:12 -0800
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8884
Fw: new message
Thu, 10 Dec 2015 18:27:49 -0800
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8883
Fw: new message
Mon, 30 Nov 2015 22:55:00 -0800
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8882
Fw: new message
Sun, 22 Nov 2015 16:00:40 -0800
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8881
Fw: new message
Sun, 22 Nov 2015 16:00:04 -0800
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8880
Fw: new message
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 17:46:02 -0800
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8879
Fw: new message
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 17:44:04 -0800
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8878
Fw: new message
Sun, 25 Oct 2015 15:54:20 -0700
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8877
Fw: new message
Sun, 25 Oct 2015 15:52:00 -0700
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8876
Fw: new message
Sun, 25 Oct 2015 15:51:57 -0700
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8875
Fw: new message
Sun, 25 Oct 2015 15:50:46 -0700
"[email protected] [pragprog]" <[email protected]> • #8874
Invitation to Solaborate!
Fri, 22 Nov 2013 02:45:48 -0800 (PST)
Fatjona Berisha <b_fatjona-/[email protected]> • #8873
★ Pragprog, Regis Maciel te mandou uma mensagem
Wed, 24 Apr 2013 21:28:10 +0000
Badoo <[email protected]> • #8872
(unknown)
Sat, 9 Mar 2013 11:44:38 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #8871
(unknown)
Fri, 22 Feb 2013 05:06:51 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #8870
(unknown)
Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:27:44 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #8869
(unknown)
Wed, 20 Feb 2013 02:15:56 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #8868
(unknown)
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:25:09 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #8867
(unknown)
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 17:20:58 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #8866
Re: Immutable Utility Objects
Sun, 4 Dec 2011 10:31:06 -0600
Chris Morris <[email protected]> • #8865
Re: Immutable Utility Objects
Sat, 03 Dec 2011 20:02:43 -0000
"Daniel" <wellman-pD6z9c7pN/[email protected]> • #8864
Re: Immutable Utility Objects
Sat, 03 Dec 2011 19:52:43 -0000
"Daniel" <wellman-pD6z9c7pN/[email protected]> • #8863
Immutable Utility Objects
Thu, 1 Dec 2011 11:43:55 -0800
Steve Wart <[email protected]> • #8862
Re: What happened to Aspect-Oriented Programming?
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:07:37 -0300
Luiz Esmiralha <[email protected]> • #8861
Re: What happened to Aspect-Oriented Programming?
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:46:35 +0200
Federico Fissore <[email protected]> • #8860
What happened to Aspect-Oriented Programming?
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:40:54 +0200
Michael Schuerig <[email protected]> • #8859
Mobile App Dev Needed
Sat, 20 Aug 2011 13:29:30 -0600
Gregg Irwin <[email protected]> • #8858
Re: Why are there no good online CS programs?
Mon, 8 Aug 2011 07:35:59 +1000
Charles Miller <[email protected]> • #8857
RE: Re: Why are there no good online CS programs?
Sun, 7 Aug 2011 17:42:39 +0200
"Jeroen Wenting" <[email protected]> • #8856
Re: Why are there no good online CS programs?
Sat, 06 Aug 2011 21:27:56 -0000
"Anne" <[email protected]> • #8855
Re: Why are there no good online CS programs?
Sat, 06 Aug 2011 21:00:02 -0000
"Anne" <[email protected]> • #8854
Re[2]: Re: Why are there no good online CS programs?
Thu, 4 Aug 2011 20:00:01 -0600
Gregg Irwin <[email protected]> • #8853
Re: Re: Why are there no good online CS programs?
Thu, 4 Aug 2011 21:48:39 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] • #8852
Re: Re: Why are there no good online CS programs?
Thu, 4 Aug 2011 13:41:12 -0600
Gregg Irwin <[email protected]> • #8851
Re: Why are there no good online CS programs?
Thu, 04 Aug 2011 18:47:03 -0000
"jefflcohen" <[email protected]> • #8850
Re: Why are there no good online CS programs?
Thu, 4 Aug 2011 18:36:33 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] • #8849
Why are there no good online CS programs?
Thu, 04 Aug 2011 15:47:24 -0000
"Anne" <[email protected]> • #8848
Are there any good online CS degrees?
Mon, 18 Jul 2011 17:28:34 -0000
"Anne" <[email protected]> • #8847
ORM is an antipattern
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 07:37:19 -0700
Steve Wart <[email protected]> • #8846
Re: Is this the year that all developers should learn JavaScript?
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:58:10 +1000
Charles Miller <[email protected]> • #8845
Re: Is this the year that all developers should learn JavaScript?
Sun, 12 Jun 2011 22:48:30 -0400
Avdi Grimm <[email protected]> • #8844
Re: Is this the year that all developers should learn JavaScript?
Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:59:18 -0400
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #8843
Re: Is this the year that all developers should learn JavaScript?
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 02:49:36 +0200
Michael Schuerig <[email protected]> • #8842
Re: Is this the year that all developers should learn JavaScript?
Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:30:46 -0400 (EDT)
Brian Hurt <[email protected]> • #8841
Re: Is this the year that all developers should learn JavaScript?
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:06:28 +0200
Michele Costabile <[email protected]> • #8840
Re: Is this the year that all developers should learn JavaScript?
Sun, 12 Jun 2011 23:44:23 +0200
Laurent Bossavit <lolists-lQPDYUS/wmpWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #8839
Re: Is this the year that all developers should learn JavaScript?
Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:26:21 -0400
Avdi Grimm <[email protected]> • #8838
Is this the year that all developers should learn JavaScript?
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:18:10 +1200
John Carter <[email protected]> • #8837
RE: What's up with C++ (books)?
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:30:25 -0700
"Wayne Johnson" <wayne-Lt/[email protected]> • #8836
Re: Re[2]: What's up with C++ (books)?
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:46:54 -0400
Avdi Grimm <[email protected]> • #8835
Re: What's up with C++ (books)?
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:46:07 -0400
Avdi Grimm <[email protected]> • #8834
Re[2]: What's up with C++ (books)?
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 10:54:38 -0600
Gregg Irwin <[email protected]> • #8833
Re: What's up with C++ (books)?
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:52:39 +0200
Michael Schuerig <[email protected]> • #8832
Re: What's up with C++ (books)?
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:44:36 -0400
Avdi Grimm <[email protected]> • #8831
Re: What's up with C++ (books)?
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:33:44 -0400
Chris Patti <[email protected]> • #8830
Re: What's up with C++ (books)?
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:20:02 -0400
Avdi Grimm <[email protected]> • #8829
Re: What's up with C++ (books)?
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:01:58 +0200
Kjell Rilbe <[email protected]> • #8828
RE: What's up with C++ (books)?
Tue, 31 May 2011 14:57:44 -0700
"Wayne Johnson" <wayne-Lt/[email protected]> • #8827
Re: What's up with C++ (books)?
Tue, 31 May 2011 20:59:26 +0200
Kjell Rilbe <[email protected]> • #8826
RE: What's up with C++ (books)?
Tue, 31 May 2011 11:11:58 -0700
"Wayne Johnson" <wayne-Lt/[email protected]> • #8825
RE: Books and a balance (was: What's up with C++ (books)?)
Tue, 31 May 2011 10:08:58 -0700
Bruce Hobbs <[email protected]> • #8824
Re: Books and a balance (was: What's up with C++ (books)?)
Tue, 31 May 2011 16:22:46 +0100
Andy Leighton <[email protected]> • #8823
RE: Books and a balance (was: What's up with C++ (books)?)
Tue, 31 May 2011 16:53:15 +0200
"Jeroen Wenting" <[email protected]> • #8822
Re: Books and a balance (was: What's up with C++ (books)?)
Tue, 31 May 2011 05:53:33 -0400
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #8821
Re: Books and a balance (was: What's up with C++ (books)?)
Tue, 31 May 2011 10:20:42 +0200
"Jeroen Wenting" <[email protected]> • #8820
Re: Re[2]: Books and a balance (was: What's up with C++ (books)?)
Tue, 31 May 2011 10:18:02 +0200
"Jeroen Wenting" <[email protected]> • #8819
Re: Re[2]: Books and a balance (was: What's up with C++ (books)?)
Tue, 31 May 2011 10:14:30 +0200
"Jeroen Wenting" <[email protected]> • #8818
Re: Books and a balance (was: What's up with C++ (books)?)
Mon, 30 May 2011 15:51:53 -0400
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #8817
Re: Re[2]: Books and a balance (was: What's up with C++ (books)?)
Mon, 30 May 2011 11:56:13 -0700
Tanton Gibbs <[email protected]> • #8816
Re[2]: Books and a balance (was: What's up with C++ (books)?)
Mon, 30 May 2011 11:34:53 -0700
Bruce Hobbs <[email protected]> • #8815
Re: What's up with C++ (books)?
Mon, 30 May 2011 12:57:48 -0400
Chris Patti <[email protected]> • #8814
Re: What's up with C++ (books)?
Mon, 30 May 2011 19:45:49 +0530
Sriram Narayanan <[email protected]> • #8813
Re: What's up with C++ (books)?
Mon, 30 May 2011 12:18:35 +0200
Kjell Rilbe <[email protected]> • #8812
Re: What's up with C++ (books)?
Mon, 30 May 2011 06:12:14 -0400
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #8811
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.