gmane.comp.programming.refactoring archive

402 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 5). Latest articles →

Meet Pi, The Much More Accessible Cryptocurrency
Sat, 12 Dec 2020 08:29:37 -0600
"'[email protected]' [email protected] [refactoring]" <[email protected]> • #9848
The Simplest Guide To Bitcoin For Beginners (Plus All You Need To Know About Pi Network)
Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:28:08 -0600
"'[email protected]' [email protected] [refactoring]" <[email protected]> • #9847
take one minute a day, give yourself a chance to get rich.Zero risk, no investment, no credit card
Mon, 26 Oct 2020 07:40:15 -0600
"'[email protected]' [email protected] [refactoring]" <[email protected]> • #9846
Meet Pi, The Much More Accessible Cryptocurrency
Sat, 26 Sep 2020 09:11:05 -0600
"'[email protected]' [email protected] [refactoring]" <[email protected]> • #9845
Will Pi Coin be the next big thing in the world of cryptocurrency?
Wed, 26 Aug 2020 08:55:56 -0600
"'[email protected]' [email protected] [refactoring]" <[email protected]> • #9844
Zero risk, no investment, no credit card required, If you miss the bitcoin at early stage, don't let this opportunity pass by again.
Sun, 26 Jul 2020 09:26:28 -0600
"'[email protected]' [email protected] [refactoring]" <[email protected]> • #9843
Zero risk, no investment, no credit card required ,Just one minute a day, give yourself a chance to get rich.
Tue, 30 Jun 2020 19:02:36 -0600
"'[email protected]' [email protected] [refactoring]" <[email protected]> • #9842
best.programs
Sun, 3 May 2020 08:33:01 +0000 (UTC)
"'[email protected]' [email protected] [refactoring]" <[email protected]> • #9841
windows&office activator
Sun, 12 Apr 2020 15:30:59 +0000 (UTC)
"'[email protected]' [email protected] [refactoring]" <[email protected]> • #9840
Great Chance to earn digital currency on your Phone, Free, No Risk, No cost.
Thu, 5 Mar 2020 21:36:47 +0000 (UTC)
"zz z [email protected] [refactoring]" <[email protected]> • #9839
PLEASE HELP!! Important request, participation in software development study
Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:37:46 +0000 (UTC)
"'[email protected]' [email protected] [refactoring]" <[email protected]> • #9838
PLEASE HELP!! Important request, participation in software development study
Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:13:09 +0000 (UTC)
"'[email protected]' [email protected] [refactoring]" <[email protected]> • #9837
Important request, participation in software development study
Wed, 19 Feb 2020 22:56:16 +0000 (UTC)
"'[email protected]' [email protected] [refactoring]" <[email protected]> • #9836
Yahoo Groups: Welcome to refactoring. Visit today!
08 Jan 2020 15:34:18 +0000
refactoring Moderator <[email protected]> • #9835
Re: We're recruiting … why not join us? LINKS FIXED
Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:15:09 +0000
Simon Thompson <[email protected]> • #9834
We're recruiting … why n ot join us?
Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:08:18 +0000
Simon Thompson <[email protected]> • #9833
Re: Refactoring and Dynamic Analysis
Mon, 25 Nov 2013 11:17:46 -0700
Richard <[email protected]> • #9832
Re: Refactoring and Dynamic Analysis
Mon, 25 Nov 2013 12:39:17 +0530
swati kumar <[email protected]> • #9831
Re: Refactoring and Dynamic Analysis
Mon, 25 Nov 2013 12:39:41 +0530
swati kumar <[email protected]> • #9830
Re: Refactoring and Dynamic Analysis
Mon, 25 Nov 2013 09:13:37 +0530
atulDOTkhotATGmailDOTcom <[email protected]> • #9829
Re: Refactoring and Dynamic Analysis
Mon, 25 Nov 2013 10:30:43 +1300
John Carter <[email protected]> • #9828
Refactoring and Dynamic Analysis
Fri, 22 Nov 2013 22:03:48 +0530
swati kumar <[email protected]> • #9827
Re: refactoring design smells
Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:34:42 +0530
atulDOTkhotATGmailDOTcom <[email protected]> • #9826
refactoring design smells
03 Oct 2013 20:56:07 -0700
<[email protected]> • #9825
RE: how to: extract interface of class with methods from a superclass
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 07:04:48 +0000
"Donaldson, John" <[email protected]> • #9824
Re: how to: extract interface of class with methods from a superclass
Sat, 21 Sep 2013 19:05:23 +0200
Michal Svoboda <[email protected]> • #9823
Re: how to: extract interface of class with methods from a superclass
Sat, 21 Sep 2013 11:20:22 +0200
Dennis Traub <[email protected]> • #9822
RE: how to: extract interface of class with methods from a superclass
Sat, 21 Sep 2013 09:11:04 +0000
"Donaldson, John" <[email protected]> • #9821
Re: how to: extract interface of class with methods from a superclass
Fri, 20 Sep 2013 20:19:06 +0200
Michal Svoboda <[email protected]> • #9820
how to: extract interface of class with methods from a superclass
Fri, 20 Sep 2013 16:55:08 +0000
"Donaldson, John" <[email protected]> • #9819
Refactoring: Sort Members by Visibility
Thu, 01 Aug 2013 06:45:58 -0600
Richard <[email protected]> • #9818
Re: Ranking of OO refactorings
Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:58:28 +1200
John Carter <[email protected]> • #9817
Re: Ranking of OO refactorings
Sun, 21 Jul 2013 19:38:38 -0700
J Arrizza <[email protected]> • #9816
Re: Ranking of OO refactorings
Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:27:40 +1200
John Carter <[email protected]> • #9815
Re: Ranking of OO refactorings
Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:57:06 -0600
Richard <[email protected]> • #9814
Re: Re: Ranking of OO refactorings
Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:53:56 -0600
Richard <[email protected]> • #9813
Re: Ranking of OO refactorings
Mon, 15 Jul 2013 10:08:30 +0530
atulDOTkhotATGmailDOTcom <[email protected]> • #9812
Re: Re: Ranking of OO refactorings
Sun, 14 Jul 2013 18:56:51 -0700
J Arrizza <[email protected]> • #9811
Re: Re: Ranking of OO refactorings
Sun, 14 Jul 2013 12:16:23 -0600
Richard <[email protected]> • #9810
Re: Re: Ranking of OO refactorings
Sun, 14 Jul 2013 11:45:13 -0400
Bill Wake <[email protected]> • #9809
Re: Re: Ranking of OO refactorings
Sun, 14 Jul 2013 08:34:36 -0600
Richard <[email protected]> • #9808
Re: Re: Ranking of OO refactorings
Sun, 14 Jul 2013 08:04:12 -0600
Danny Dig <[email protected]> • #9807
Re: Ranking of OO refactorings
Sun, 14 Jul 2013 13:06:55 -0000
"K. Cassell" <[email protected]> • #9806
Re: Re: Ranking of OO refactorings
Sat, 13 Jul 2013 10:46:19 -0600
Richard <[email protected]> • #9805
Re: Ranking of OO refactorings
Sat, 13 Jul 2013 07:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
"K. Cassell" <[email protected]> • #9804
Re: Fwd: Compiler Guided Refactoring.
Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:08:58 +1200
John Carter <[email protected]> • #9803
Ranking of OO refactorings
Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:35:37 -0600
Richard <[email protected]> • #9802
Re: Fwd: Compiler Guided Refactoring.
Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:19:28 -0600
Richard <[email protected]> • #9801
Re: Fwd: Compiler Guided Refactoring.
Wed, 10 Jul 2013 05:24:32 -0700
J Arrizza <[email protected]> • #9800
Re: Fwd: Compiler Guided Refactoring.
Wed, 10 Jul 2013 06:58:56 +0100
Andrew McDonagh <[email protected]> • #9799
Re: Fwd: Compiler Guided Refactoring.
Tue, 9 Jul 2013 21:07:15 -0700
J Arrizza <[email protected]> • #9798
Re: Fwd: Compiler Guided Refactoring.
Mon, 08 Jul 2013 17:37:56 -0600
Richard <[email protected]> • #9797
Re: Fwd: Compiler Guided Refactoring.
Mon, 8 Jul 2013 15:54:17 -0700
J Arrizza <[email protected]> • #9796
Re: Fwd: Compiler Guided Refactoring.
Mon, 8 Jul 2013 15:36:53 -0700
J Arrizza <[email protected]> • #9795
Re: Fwd: Compiler Guided Refactoring.
Tue, 9 Jul 2013 10:02:38 +1200
John Carter <[email protected]> • #9794
Re: Fwd: Compiler Guided Refactoring.
Mon, 08 Jul 2013 12:27:30 -0600
Richard <[email protected]> • #9793
Re: Fwd: Compiler Guided Refactoring.
Sat, 6 Jul 2013 10:31:52 -0700
J Arrizza <[email protected]> • #9792
Re: Fwd: Compiler Guided Refactoring.
Thu, 4 Jul 2013 23:34:41 +0100
Andrew McDonagh <[email protected]> • #9791
Re: Fwd: Compiler Guided Refactoring.
Thu, 4 Jul 2013 15:28:41 -0700
J Arrizza <[email protected]> • #9790
Re: Fwd: Compiler Guided Refactoring.
Thu, 04 Jul 2013 08:27:44 -0600
Richard <[email protected]> • #9789
Re: Fwd: Compiler Guided Refactoring.
Wed, 3 Jul 2013 09:16:44 -0700
J Arrizza <[email protected]> • #9788
Re: Fwd: Compiler Guided Refactoring.
Wed, 03 Jul 2013 08:26:45 -0600
Richard <[email protected]> • #9787
Fwd: Compiler Guided Refactoring.
Tue, 2 Jul 2013 15:41:54 +1200
John Carter <[email protected]> • #9786
Re: Re: 鍥炲: Re: [refactoring] Why is 'else' demanded?
Mon, 17 Jun 2013 18:35:59 +0800
zhanghongliang <[email protected]> • #9785
Re: 回复: Re: [refactoring] Why is 'else ' demanded?
Mon, 17 Jun 2013 10:18:27 +0200
Willem Bogaerts <[email protected]> • #9784
Re: ??????: Re: Why is 'else' demanded?
Sat, 15 Jun 2013 13:34:15 -0600
Richard <[email protected]> • #9783
回复: Re: [refactoring] Why is 'else' demanded?
Fri, 14 Jun 2013 17:54:27 +0800
zhanghongliang <[email protected]> • #9782
Re: Re: Why is 'else' demanded?
Fri, 14 Jun 2013 17:49:44 +0800
zhanghongliang <[email protected]> • #9781
Re: Re: Why is 'else' demanded?
Thu, 13 Jun 2013 22:35:46 -0700
Steven Gordon <[email protected]> • #9780
Re: Re: Why is 'else' demanded?
Thu, 13 Jun 2013 20:39:57 -0700 (PDT)
Andrew Luo <[email protected]> • #9779
Re: Re: Why is 'else' demanded?
Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:39:30 +0800
zhanghongliang <[email protected]> • #9778
Re: Re: Why is 'else' demanded?
Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:34:13 +0800
zhanghongliang <[email protected]> • #9777
Re: Re: Why is 'else' demanded?
Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:25:54 +0800
zhanghongliang <[email protected]> • #9776
Re: Why is 'else' demanded?
Mon, 10 Jun 2013 23:34:09 +0800
Carfield Yim <[email protected]> • #9775
Re: Why is 'else' demanded?
Mon, 10 Jun 2013 07:15:36 -0700
Colby Callahan <[email protected]> • #9774
Re: Why is 'else' demanded?
Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:24:21 +0800
张红亮 <[email protected]> • #9773
Re: Why is 'else' demanded?
Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:41:50 +0200
Willem Bogaerts <[email protected]> • #9772
Re: Why is 'else' demanded?
Sun, 9 Jun 2013 13:07:31 -0700
Steven Gordon <[email protected]> • #9771
Why is 'else' demanded?
Mon, 10 Jun 2013 03:02:21 +0800
张红亮 <[email protected]> • #9770
Mockator CDT Eclipse plugin
Tue, 16 Apr 2013 14:02:22 -0600
Richard <[email protected]> • #9769
[announcement] Refactoring Dojo Workshop in London this June
Sun, 7 Apr 2013 16:55:45 -0400
Danijel Arsenovski <[email protected]> • #9768
Re:7
Fri, 4 Jan 2013 03:52:06 -0800 (PST)
Tomi Juhola <[email protected]> • #9767
Re: single return from function
Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:10:33 -0600
Alfredo Chavez <[email protected]> • #9766
Re: single return from function
Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:14:04 +0100
Willem Bogaerts <[email protected]> • #9765
Re: single return from function
Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:58:27 -0600
Alfredo Chávez <[email protected]> • #9764
RE: single return from function
Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:51:16 -0800
"Amir Kolsky" <[email protected]> • #9763
Re: single return from function
Thu, 15 Nov 2012 22:21:10 -0700
Jeff Langr <[email protected]> • #9762
RE: single return from function
Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:07:53 -0800
"Mark Miller" <[email protected]> • #9761
Re: single return from function
Thu, 15 Nov 2012 19:39:38 -0800
Keith Ray <[email protected]> • #9760
single return from function
Fri, 16 Nov 2012 02:09:24 -0000
"alex_us01" <[email protected]> • #9759
RE: Refactoring process model,
Mon, 29 Oct 2012 22:10:09 +0800 (SGT)
Aisha Fernandes <[email protected]> • #9758
Re: Refactoring process model,
Mon, 29 Oct 2012 05:12:29 -0000
"rd.naik" <[email protected]> • #9757
Re: Refactoring process model,
Mon, 29 Oct 2012 08:37:06 -0000
"rd.naik" <[email protected]> • #9756
Re: Refactoring process model,
Sun, 28 Oct 2012 21:56:16 +0000
Adrian Howard <[email protected]> • #9755
Re: Refactoring process model,
Sun, 28 Oct 2012 14:31:05 -0700
Adam Sroka <[email protected]> • #9754
RE: Refactoring process model,
Sun, 28 Oct 2012 12:54:39 -0700
"Amir Kolsky" <[email protected]> • #9753
Re: Refactoring process model,
Sun, 28 Oct 2012 12:51:28 -0700
Adam Sroka <[email protected]> • #9752
RE: Refactoring process model,
Sun, 28 Oct 2012 12:42:26 -0700
"Amir Kolsky" <[email protected]> • #9751
Re: Refactoring process model,
Sun, 28 Oct 2012 12:38:49 -0700
Adam Sroka <[email protected]> • #9750
RE: Refactoring process model,
Sun, 28 Oct 2012 12:30:28 -0700
"Amir Kolsky" <[email protected]> • #9749
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.