gmane.comp.python.db.psycopg.devel archive

1213 archived articles, newest first (page 9 of 13). Latest articles →

Re: connection pooling
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:32:09 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4930
connection pooling
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:31:04 -0600
David <[email protected]> • #4929
Re: Psycopg 2.0.9 on Windows
Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:07:51 -0600 (MDT)
Jason Erickson <[email protected]> • #4928
Re: Psycopg 2.0.9 on Windows
Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:12:31 -0500
Patrick Hartling <[email protected]> • #4927
Psycopg 2.0.9 on Windows
Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:13:01 -0500
Patrick Hartling <[email protected]> • #4926
Re: Access to bzr repository
Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:37:38 +1000
Andrew Bennetts <[email protected]> • #4925
Re: Access to bzr repository
Mon, 9 Mar 2009 22:55:22 -0500
Glenn R Williams <[email protected]> • #4924
Re: Access to bzr repository
Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:26:05 +0900
James Henstridge <[email protected]> • #4923
Access to bzr repository
Mon, 9 Mar 2009 16:46:53 -0500
Glenn R Williams <[email protected]> • #4922
Re: ProgrammingError: can't adapt (None)
Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:05:20 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4921
Re: ProgrammingError: can't adapt (None)
Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:33:07 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4920
Re: ProgrammingError: can't adapt (None)
Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:42:22 +0100
Hartmut Goebel <[email protected]> • #4919
Re: Segfault in in PyString_FromStringAndSize
Mon, 9 Mar 2009 15:16:50 -0200
"Fernando M. Maresca" <[email protected]> • #4918
Re: Segfault in in PyString_FromStringAndSize
Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:23:30 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4917
Re: ProgrammingError: can't adapt (None)
Mon, 09 Mar 2009 09:27:25 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4916
Re: Segfault in in PyString_FromStringAndSize
Sat, 7 Mar 2009 12:54:22 -0200
"Fernando M. Maresca" <[email protected]> • #4915
Re: Wierd "ProgrammingError" with "E" string prefix
Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:36:02 +0100
Hartmut Goebel <[email protected]> • #4914
ProgrammingError: can't adapt (None)
Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:32:17 +0100
Hartmut Goebel <[email protected]> • #4913
Re: Segfault in in PyString_FromStringAndSize
Fri, 6 Mar 2009 13:12:12 -0200
"Fernando M. Maresca" <[email protected]> • #4912
Re: Segfault in in PyString_FromStringAndSize
Fri, 6 Mar 2009 10:06:04 -0500
James Henstridge <[email protected]> • #4911
Re: Segfault in in PyString_FromStringAndSize
Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:27:16 -0200
"Fernando M. Maresca" <[email protected]> • #4910
Segfault in in PyString_FromStringAndSize
Thu, 5 Mar 2009 12:09:38 -0200
"Fernando M. Maresca" <[email protected]> • #4909
Re: Wierd "ProgrammingError" with "E" string prefix
Wed, 4 Mar 2009 23:33:16 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #4908
Re: Wierd "ProgrammingError" with "E" string prefix
Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:07:23 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4907
Re: Wierd "ProgrammingError" with "E" string prefix
Wed, 4 Mar 2009 16:37:20 -0500
James Henstridge <[email protected]> • #4906
Re: Wierd "ProgrammingError" with "E" string prefix
Wed, 4 Mar 2009 21:52:48 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #4905
Re: Wierd "ProgrammingError" with "E" string prefix
Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:51:59 +0100
Hartmut Goebel <[email protected]> • #4904
Re: Wierd "ProgrammingError" with "E" string prefix
Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:25:32 +0100
Hartmut Goebel <[email protected]> • #4903
Re: Wierd "ProgrammingError" with "E" string prefix
Wed, 4 Mar 2009 20:46:10 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #4902
Re: Wierd "ProgrammingError" with "E" string prefix
Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:04:27 -0800
Tim Roberts <[email protected]> • #4901
Re: Wierd "ProgrammingError" with "E" string prefix
Wed, 4 Mar 2009 19:52:18 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #4900
Re: Wierd "ProgrammingError" with "E" string prefix
Wed, 4 Mar 2009 19:20:37 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #4899
Re: Wierd "ProgrammingError" with "E" string prefix
Wed, 4 Mar 2009 19:19:08 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #4898
Re: Wierd "ProgrammingError" with "E" string prefix
Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:56:11 -0800
Tim Roberts <[email protected]> • #4897
Re: Wierd "ProgrammingError" with "E" string prefix
Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:52:51 -0800
Tim Roberts <[email protected]> • #4896
Re: Wierd "ProgrammingError" with "E" string prefix
Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:55:52 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4895
Re: Wierd "ProgrammingError" with "E" string prefix
Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:51:23 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4894
Re: Wierd "ProgrammingError" with "E" string prefix
Wed, 4 Mar 2009 06:30:04 -0800
Adrian Klaver <[email protected]> • #4893
Re: Wierd "ProgrammingError" with "E" string prefix
Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:33:49 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4892
Re: Wierd "ProgrammingError" with "E" string prefix
Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:25:57 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4891
Re: Wierd "ProgrammingError" with "E" string prefix
Wed, 4 Mar 2009 12:04:46 +0100
Markus Demleitner <[email protected]> • #4890
Re: Wierd "ProgrammingError" with "E" string prefix
Wed, 4 Mar 2009 12:33:19 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #4889
Re: Wierd "ProgrammingError" with "E" string prefix
Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:54:39 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4888
Re: Wierd "ProgrammingError" with "E" string prefix
Wed, 4 Mar 2009 11:18:08 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #4887
Re: Wierd "ProgrammingError" with "E" string prefix
Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:59:34 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4886
Re: Wierd "ProgrammingError" with "E" string prefix
Wed, 4 Mar 2009 09:41:39 +0100
Harald Armin Massa <[email protected]> • #4885
Re: Wierd "ProgrammingError" with "E" string prefix
Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:58:35 -0800
Tim Roberts <[email protected]> • #4884
Wierd "ProgrammingError" with "E" string prefix
Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:36:51 +0100
Hartmut Goebel <[email protected]> • #4883
Re: does the executemany() limitation with result sets apply to INSERT..RETURNING ?
Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:57:15 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4882
Re: does the executemany() limitation with result sets apply to INSERT..RETURNING ?
Tue, 3 Mar 2009 08:59:03 -0500
Michael Bayer <[email protected]> • #4881
Re: does the executemany() limitation with result sets apply to INSERT..RETURNING ?
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 20:29:11 -0500
James Henstridge <[email protected]> • #4880
Re: does the executemany() limitation with result sets apply to INSERT..RETURNING ?
Mon, 02 Mar 2009 23:47:33 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4879
Re: does the executemany() limitation with result sets apply to INSERT..RETURNING ?
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 17:32:09 -0500
Michael Bayer <[email protected]> • #4878
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 11:39:01 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #4877
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:34:05 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4876
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 11:30:14 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #4875
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:31:06 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4874
Re: does the executemany() limitation with result sets apply to INSERT..RETURNING ?
Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:09:19 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4873
does the executemany() limitation with result sets apply to INSERT..RETURNING ?
Sun, 1 Mar 2009 15:07:16 -0500
Michael Bayer <[email protected]> • #4872
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:07:40 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #4871
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:04:43 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4870
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:00:03 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #4869
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:52:50 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4868
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:44:17 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #4867
Re: Array with a lower bound>1, PostgreSQL 8.3.6
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:08:37 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #4866
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:04:48 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #4865
Re: Array with a lower bound>1, PostgreSQL 8.3.6
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:58:26 +0100
Thomas Jacob <[email protected]> • #4864
Re: Array with a lower bound>1, PostgreSQL 8.3.6
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:53:08 +0100
Thomas Jacob <[email protected]> • #4863
Re: Array with a lower bound>1, PostgreSQL 8.3.6
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:06:13 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #4862
Re: Array with a lower bound>1, PostgreSQL 8.3.6
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:03:46 -0800
Tim Roberts <[email protected]> • #4861
Re: Array with a lower bound>1, PostgreSQL 8.3.6
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:42:42 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4860
Re: Array with a lower bound>1, PostgreSQL 8.3.6
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:35:50 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #4859
Re: Array with a lower bound>1, PostgreSQL 8.3.6
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:25:38 -0300
Clodoaldo Pinto Neto <[email protected]> • #4858
Re: psycopg2
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:22:06 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4857
Re: Array with a lower bound>1, PostgreSQL 8.3.6
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:15:40 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4856
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:46:19 -0500
James Henstridge <[email protected]> • #4855
Re: Array with a lower bound>1, PostgreSQL 8.3.6
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:20:48 -0800
Tim Roberts <[email protected]> • #4854
Re: Array with a lower bound>1, PostgreSQL 8.3.6
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:07:46 +0100
Thomas Jacob <[email protected]> • #4853
Re: Array with a lower bound>1, PostgreSQL 8.3.6
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:36:21 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #4852
Array with a lower bound>1, PostgreSQL 8.3.6
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:22:34 +0100
Thomas Jacob <[email protected]> • #4851
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:01:51 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #4850
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:49:13 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4849
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:46:17 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #4848
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:27:12 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4847
RELEASE: Psycopg 2.0.9
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:49:55 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4846
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:11:20 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4845
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:40:43 +1100
James Henstridge <[email protected]> • #4844
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:27:56 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4843
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:18:51 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #4842
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:29:47 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #4841
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:13:52 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #4840
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:11:18 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #4839
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:56:37 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4838
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:28:34 +0900
James Henstridge <[email protected]> • #4837
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:04:39 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #4836
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:36:25 +0900
James Henstridge <[email protected]> • #4835
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:00:09 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #4834
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:51:19 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #4833
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:00:53 +0100
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> • #4832
Re: problem with timezone parsing
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:57:35 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #4831
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.