gmane.comp.science.types archive

397 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: [TYPES] What's a program? (Seriously)
Wed, 19 May 2021 11:29:47 +0200
Freek Wiedijk <[email protected]> • #6447
Re: [TYPES] What's a program? (Seriously)
Wed, 19 May 2021 10:54:51 +0100
Neel Krishnaswami <[email protected]> • #6446
Re: [TYPES] What's a program? (Seriously)
Wed, 19 May 2021 10:03:33 +0100
Martin Escardo <[email protected]> • #6445
Re: [TYPES] What's a program? (Seriously)
Wed, 19 May 2021 10:08:37 +0200
Ansten Mørch Klev <[email protected]> • #6444
Re: [TYPES] What's a program? (Seriously)
Wed, 19 May 2021 10:03:36 +0200
Sandro Stucki <[email protected]> • #6443
Re: [TYPES] What's a program? (Seriously)
Tue, 18 May 2021 21:58:19 +0100
Martin Escardo <[email protected]> • #6442
Re: [TYPES] What's a program? (Seriously)
Tue, 18 May 2021 23:26:37 +0200
Gavin Mendel-Gleason <[email protected]> • #6441
Re: [TYPES] What's a program? (Seriously)
Tue, 18 May 2021 14:18:42 -0700
Talia Ringer <[email protected]> • #6440
Re: [TYPES] What's a program? (Seriously)
Tue, 18 May 2021 22:44:45 +0200
Sergey Goncharov <[email protected]> • #6439
Re: [TYPES] What's a program? (Seriously)
Tue, 18 May 2021 23:00:18 +0100
Neel Krishnaswami <[email protected]> • #6438
Re: [TYPES] What's a program? (Seriously)
Tue, 18 May 2021 22:10:37 +0100
Martin Escardo <[email protected]> • #6437
Re: [TYPES] What's a program? (Seriously)
Tue, 18 May 2021 22:51:56 +0100
Martin Escardo <[email protected]> • #6436
Re: [TYPES] What's a program? (Seriously)
Tue, 18 May 2021 16:39:52 -0400
Stefan Monnier <[email protected]> • #6435
[TYPES] What's a program? (Seriously)
Tue, 18 May 2021 12:42:20 -0700
Talia Ringer <[email protected]> • #6434
[TYPES] Strong Normalization for Dependent Typed Calculus
Thu, 13 May 2021 00:07:38 -0400
Anitha Gollamudi <[email protected]> • #6433
Re: [TYPES] Practical Foundations for Programming Languages : 2e : Requesting review
Mon, 19 Apr 2021 09:59:18 -0400
Benjamin Pierce <[email protected]> • #6432
[TYPES] Practical Foundations for Programming Language s : 2e : Requesting review
Fri, 16 Apr 2021 10:53:26 +0200
"email-4S4vSiQJ6JoQsIvi67EU1QC/[email protected]" <email-4S4vSiQJ6JoQsIvi67EU1QC/[email protected]> • #6431
Re: [TYPES] normalization by evaluation for strong sums for STLC
Tue, 30 Mar 2021 08:12:10 +0100
Neelakantan Krishnaswami <[email protected]> • #6430
[TYPES] normalization by evaluation for strong sums for STLC
Tue, 30 Mar 2021 02:34:05 +0000
Jason -Zhong Sheng- Hu <[email protected]> • #6429
[TYPES] Announcing a "types" Zulip Chat, experimental for now
Wed, 3 Mar 2021 16:07:38 +0100
Gabriel Scherer <[email protected]> • #6428
Re: [TYPES] typability in Curry-style System F
Tue, 9 Feb 2021 11:38:18 +0100
Paweł Urzyczyn <urzy-Q8V+/[email protected]> • #6427
[TYPES] typability in Curry-style System F
Mon, 8 Feb 2021 19:56:18 +0100
Uwe Nestmann <[email protected]> • #6426
Re: [TYPES] Type systems for cryptographic proofs
Tue, 26 Jan 2021 16:04:32 +0100
Jelle Herold <jelle-kIsX6l2ZSilmR6Xm/[email protected]> • #6425
Re: [TYPES] Type systems for cryptographic proofs
Mon, 25 Jan 2021 09:20:01 +0000
Mads Buch <me-dCzsxaMYwglWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #6424
Re: [TYPES] Type systems for cryptographic proofs
Mon, 25 Jan 2021 09:23:07 +0100
Gabriel Scherer <[email protected]> • #6423
[TYPES] Type systems for cryptographic proofs
Sun, 24 Jan 2021 12:06:53 -0800
Talia Ringer <[email protected]> • #6422
[TYPES] open letter: make POPL and future virtual conferences more inclusive
Mon, 21 Dec 2020 22:43:01 -0500
Jonathan Aldrich <[email protected]> • #6421
Re: [TYPES] Optimizing data representation
Thu, 10 Dec 2020 19:41:23 +0000
Richard Eisenberg <rae-icOkP4L6Z86/[email protected]> • #6420
Re: [TYPES] Optimizing data representation
Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:49:23 -0500
Stefan Monnier <[email protected]> • #6419
[TYPES] Optimizing data representation
Wed, 9 Dec 2020 21:32:59 +0000
Richard Eisenberg <rae-icOkP4L6Z86/[email protected]> • #6418
Re: [TYPES] Types for Units-of-Measure
Mon, 16 Nov 2020 21:08:20 +0100
Clemens Grelck <c.grelck-V/Xpf/[email protected]> • #6417
Re: [TYPES] [EXT] Re: Types for Units-of-Measure
Mon, 9 Nov 2020 14:11:34 +0000
Reuben Rowe <[email protected]> • #6416
Re: [TYPES] Types for Units-of-Measure
Mon, 9 Nov 2020 13:56:11 +0100
François Pottier <[email protected]> • #6415
[TYPES] Types for Units-of-Measure
Mon, 9 Nov 2020 22:42:56 +1100
Rodney Brown <[email protected]> • #6414
[TYPES] Call for Papers - SPIN 2021
Thu, 5 Nov 2020 16:41:43 +0000
"Laarman, A.W." <a.w.laarman-yutyW+Z73fWvezkx17PYy4RWq/[email protected]> • #6413
Re: [TYPES] online conferences should be free (was: global debriefing over our virtual experience of conferences)
Sun, 27 Sep 2020 18:23:26 +0200
Gabriel Scherer <[email protected]> • #6412
[TYPES] Pledge in favor of open access
Mon, 14 Sep 2020 02:12:52 +0200
Nguyễn Lê Thành Dũng <[email protected]> • #6411
Re: [TYPES] online conferences should be free (was: global debriefing over our virtual experience of conferences)
Tue, 8 Sep 2020 13:04:43 +0200
Gabriel Scherer <[email protected]> • #6410
Re: [TYPES] online conferences should be free (was: global debriefing over our virtual experience of conferences)
Thu, 27 Aug 2020 10:08:55 +0200
Ralf Jung <[email protected]> • #6409
[TYPES] Online vs travel
Wed, 26 Aug 2020 15:09:26 -0400
Hendrik Boom <hendrik-e9JHxFxFq/[email protected]> • #6408
Re: [TYPES] [EXT] Re: online conferences should be free
Wed, 26 Aug 2020 08:21:46 +0100
Nicolai Kraus <[email protected]> • #6407
Re: [TYPES] [EXT] Re: online conferences should be free
Wed, 26 Aug 2020 10:55:12 -0400
"Harley D. Eades III" <[email protected]> • #6406
Re: [TYPES] online conferences should be free (was: global debriefing over our virtual experience of conferences)
Tue, 25 Aug 2020 19:12:17 -0400
Julia Belyakova <[email protected]> • #6405
Re: [TYPES] [EXT] Re: online conferences should be free
Tue, 25 Aug 2020 22:08:17 +0100
Reuben Rowe <[email protected]> • #6404
Re: [TYPES] online conferences should be free
Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:37:32 -0400
Stefan Monnier <[email protected]> • #6403
Re: [TYPES] online conferences should be free (was: global debriefing over our virtual experience of conferences)
Tue, 25 Aug 2020 22:24:51 +0200
Gabriel Scherer <[email protected]> • #6402
Re: [TYPES] online conferences should be free (was: global debriefing over our virtual experience of conferences)
Tue, 25 Aug 2020 22:07:50 +0200
Gabriel Scherer <[email protected]> • #6401
Re: [TYPES] online conferences should be free
Tue, 25 Aug 2020 14:47:17 +0200
Kristina Sojakova <[email protected]> • #6400
Re: [TYPES] online conferences should be free
Mon, 24 Aug 2020 15:25:36 +0200
Henning Basold <h.basold-yutyW+Z73fWvezkx17PYy4RWq/[email protected]> • #6399
Re: [TYPES] online conferences should be free
Mon, 24 Aug 2020 17:18:17 +0100
Nicolai Kraus <[email protected]> • #6398
Re: [TYPES] online conferences should be free
Mon, 24 Aug 2020 09:03:04 -0400
Stefan Monnier <[email protected]> • #6397
Re: [TYPES] global debriefing over our virtual experience of conferences
Mon, 24 Aug 2020 18:59:55 +0900
Oleg <[email protected]> • #6396
Re: [TYPES] global debriefing over our virtual experience of conferences
Mon, 24 Aug 2020 09:09:47 +0200
Buday Gergely István <[email protected]> • #6395
Re: [TYPES] online conferences should be free (was: global debriefing over our virtual experience of conferences)
Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:48:59 +0200
Henning Basold <h.basold-yutyW+Z73fWvezkx17PYy4RWq/[email protected]> • #6394
Re: [TYPES] global debriefing over our virtual experience of conferences
Sun, 23 Aug 2020 23:07:13 -0700
Talia Ringer <[email protected]> • #6393
Re: [TYPES] online conferences should be free (was: global debriefing over our virtual experience of conferences)
Mon, 24 Aug 2020 01:14:07 +0100
Nicolai Kraus <[email protected]> • #6392
Re: [TYPES] global debriefing over our virtual experience of conferences
Sun, 23 Aug 2020 20:33:30 -0400
"Jon Sterling" <[email protected]> • #6391
Re: [TYPES] online conferences should be free (was: global debriefing over our virtual experience of conferences)
Sun, 23 Aug 2020 21:23:15 +0200
Henning Basold <h.basold-yutyW+Z73fWvezkx17PYy4RWq/[email protected]> • #6390
[TYPES] Fwd: Panel Debate, Wednesday 2 September @ 3pm UTC: "Evolution or Revolution? The Future of Conferences in Theoretical Computer Science"
Sun, 23 Aug 2020 17:42:35 +0100
Nicolai Kraus <[email protected]> • #6389
Re: [TYPES] global debriefing over our virtual experience of conferences
Sun, 23 Aug 2020 08:11:21 -0700
Talia Ringer <[email protected]> • #6388
Re: [TYPES] online conferences should be free (was: global debriefing over our virtual experience of conferences)
Sun, 23 Aug 2020 17:35:34 +0100
Nicolai Kraus <[email protected]> • #6387
Re: [TYPES] online conferences should be free (was: global debriefing over our virtual experience of conferences)
Sun, 23 Aug 2020 10:53:41 -0400
Michael Hicks <[email protected]> • #6386
Re: [TYPES] online conferences should be free (was: global debriefing over our virtual experience of conferences)
Sun, 23 Aug 2020 07:14:12 -0700
Talia Ringer <[email protected]> • #6385
[TYPES] online conferences should be free (was: global debriefing over our virtual experience of conferences)
Sun, 23 Aug 2020 16:05:44 +0200
Gabriel Scherer <[email protected]> • #6384
Re: [TYPES] global debriefing over our virtual experience of conferences
Sun, 23 Aug 2020 15:57:49 +0200
Gabriel Scherer <[email protected]> • #6383
Re: [TYPES] global debriefing over our virtual experience of conferences
Tue, 18 Aug 2020 18:06:22 +0200
Serguei Lenglet <[email protected]> • #6382
Re: [TYPES] what is "lexical" about "lexical scoping"?
Mon, 3 Aug 2020 19:19:50 -0400
Hendrik Boom <hendrik-e9JHxFxFq/[email protected]> • #6381
Re: [TYPES] what is "lexical" about "lexical scoping"?
Sun, 2 Aug 2020 13:44:39 -0400
Robert Harper <[email protected]> • #6380
Re: [TYPES] what is "lexical" about "lexical scoping"?
Sun, 02 Aug 2020 23:34:14 -0400
Stefan Monnier <[email protected]> • #6379
Re: [TYPES] what is "lexical" about "lexical scoping"?
Mon, 03 Aug 2020 10:27:33 -0400
Norman Ramsey <nr-ETyUHPx6wWv2fBVCVOL8/[email protected]> • #6378
Re: [TYPES] what is "lexical" about "lexical scoping"?
Sat, 1 Aug 2020 12:54:06 -0300 (ADT)
[email protected] • #6377
Re: [TYPES] what is "lexical" about "lexical scoping"?
Sat, 1 Aug 2020 08:36:40 -0700
Kim Bruce <[email protected]> • #6376
Re: [TYPES] what is "lexical" about "lexical scoping"?
Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:56:42 -0400
Jacob Thomas Errington <[email protected]> • #6375
Re: [TYPES] what is "lexical" about "lexical scoping"?
Fri, 31 Jul 2020 09:49:24 -0700
Michael Greenberg <[email protected]> • #6374
Re: [TYPES] what is "lexical" about "lexical scoping"?
Fri, 31 Jul 2020 12:35:32 +0000
Simone Martini <[email protected]> • #6373
Re: [TYPES] what is "lexical" about "lexical scoping"?
Thu, 30 Jul 2020 14:51:28 -0400
Rishiyur Nikhil <[email protected]> • #6372
[TYPES] what is "lexical" about "lexical scoping"?
Wed, 29 Jul 2020 19:06:52 -0400
Norman Ramsey <nr-ETyUHPx6wWv2fBVCVOL8/[email protected]> • #6371
[TYPES] global debriefing over our virtual experience of conferences
Mon, 27 Jul 2020 18:19:50 +0200
Flavien Breuvart <[email protected]> • #6370
Re: [TYPES] artifacts for double blind submissions: what about copyright?
Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:39:07 +0200
Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt-o/5/jSaJEHk+NdeTPqioyti2O/[email protected]> • #6369
Re: [TYPES] artifacts for double blind submissions: what about copyright?
Sun, 21 Jun 2020 17:46:23 +0200
Paolo Giarrusso <[email protected]> • #6368
Re: [TYPES] artifacts for double blind submissions: what about copyright?
Sun, 21 Jun 2020 16:25:52 +0200
Tadeusz Litak <[email protected]> • #6367
Re: [TYPES] artifacts for double blind submissions: what about copyright?
Sun, 21 Jun 2020 13:20:00 +0200
Florian Weimer <[email protected]> • #6366
Re: [TYPES] artifacts for double blind submissions: what about copyright?
Sun, 21 Jun 2020 03:06:07 +0900
Francis Davey <[email protected]> • #6365
Re: [TYPES] artifacts for double blind submissions: what about copyright?
Sat, 20 Jun 2020 13:21:25 -0400
Stefan Monnier <[email protected]> • #6364
Re: [TYPES] artifacts for double blind submissions: what about copyright?
Sat, 20 Jun 2020 18:10:23 +0200
Xavier Leroy <[email protected]> • #6363
Re: [TYPES] artifacts for double blind submissions: what about copyright?
Sat, 20 Jun 2020 17:37:01 +0200
Gabriel Scherer <[email protected]> • #6362
Re: [TYPES] artifacts for double blind submissions: what about copyright?
Sat, 20 Jun 2020 08:20:05 -0600
Eric Eide <eeide-sDh8Nw2yj/[email protected]> • #6361
Re: [TYPES] artifacts for double blind submissions: what about copyright?
Sat, 20 Jun 2020 23:36:43 +1000
mukesh tiwari <[email protected]> • #6360
[TYPES] artifacts for double blind submissions: what about copyright?
Fri, 19 Jun 2020 16:06:44 +0200
Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt-o/5/jSaJEHk+NdeTPqioyti2O/[email protected]> • #6359
[TYPES] [Announce]: biblatex-software package available for citing software artifacts
Mon, 4 May 2020 14:47:48 +0200
Roberto Di Cosmo <[email protected]> • #6358
Re: [TYPES] Towards Sustainable Open Access: thoughts on the ACM OPEN
Sun, 3 May 2020 00:10:19 -0400
Robert Rand <[email protected]> • #6357
Re: [TYPES] Towards Sustainable Open Access: thoughts on the ACM OPEN
Sat, 2 May 2020 00:53:11 -0300 (ADT)
[email protected] • #6356
Re: [TYPES] effect vs. coeffect expressiveness
Fri, 1 May 2020 13:54:24 +0000
"O'Hearn, Peter" <p.ohearn-hclig2XLE9Zaa/[email protected]> • #6355
Re: [TYPES] effect vs. coeffect expressiveness
Fri, 1 May 2020 12:57:16 +0200
Ralf Jung <[email protected]> • #6354
Re: [TYPES] effect vs. coeffect expressiveness
Fri, 1 May 2020 16:57:33 +1200
Marco Servetto <[email protected]> • #6353
Re: [TYPES] effect vs. coeffect expressiveness
Thu, 30 Apr 2020 22:59:03 +0100
Neel Krishnaswami <[email protected]> • #6352
Re: [TYPES] effect vs. coeffect expressiveness
Thu, 30 Apr 2020 21:45:17 +0200
Michael Arntzenius <[email protected]> • #6351
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.