gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general archive

403 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 5). Latest articles →

Re: C23 support in Autoconf
Tue, 30 Apr 2024 11:43:45 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #17949
Re: C23 support in Autoconf
Tue, 30 Apr 2024 11:24:14 -0700
Alan Coopersmith <[email protected]> • #17948
Re: Making MSVC/clang-cl succeed AC_PROG_CC C11 discovery
Tue, 30 Apr 2024 19:22:51 +0100
Sam James <[email protected]> • #17947
Re: Making MSVC/clang-cl succeed AC_PROG_CC C11 discovery
Tue, 30 Apr 2024 18:13:07 +0000 (UTC)
Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> • #17946
Re: Making MSVC/clang-cl succeed AC_PROG_CC C11 discovery
Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:11:28 -0300
Antonin Décimo <[email protected]> • #17945
Re: Making MSVC/clang-cl succeed AC_PROG_CC C11 discovery
Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:09:14 -0300
Antonin Décimo <[email protected]> • #17944
Re: Making MSVC/clang-cl succeed AC_PROG_CC C11 discovery
Tue, 30 Apr 2024 19:01:13 +0100
Sam James <[email protected]> • #17943
C23 support in Autoconf
Tue, 30 Apr 2024 10:51:33 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #17942
Re: Making MSVC/clang-cl succeed AC_PROG_CC C11 discovery
Tue, 30 Apr 2024 10:43:54 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #17941
Re: Making MSVC/clang-cl succeed AC_PROG_CC C11 discovery
Fri, 26 Apr 2024 17:18:11 -0300
Antonin Décimo <[email protected]> • #17940
Re: Making MSVC/clang-cl succeed AC_PROG_CC C11 discovery
Fri, 26 Apr 2024 11:10:38 -0400
Zack Weinberg <[email protected]> • #17939
Making MSVC/clang-cl succeed AC_PROG_CC C11 discovery
Tue, 23 Apr 2024 21:05:38 -0300
Antonin Décimo <[email protected]> • #17938
Making MSVC/clang-cl succeed AC_PROG_CC C11 discovery
Tue, 23 Apr 2024 21:07:49 -0300
Antonin Décimo <[email protected]> • #17937
Re: configure adds -std=gnu++11 to CXX variable
Tue, 5 Mar 2024 11:57:06 +1000
Peter Johansson <[email protected]> • #17936
Re: configure adds -std=gnu++11 to CXX variable
Mon, 04 Mar 2024 09:57:54 -0500
"Zack Weinberg" <[email protected]> • #17935
Re: configure adds -std=gnu++11 to CXX variable
Mon, 04 Mar 2024 09:54:04 -0500
"Zack Weinberg" <[email protected]> • #17934
configure adds -std=gnu++11 to CXX variable
Mon, 4 Mar 2024 15:17:39 +1000
Peter Johansson <[email protected]> • #17933
Re: Is it safe to use ax_gcc_builtin to detect __builtin_offsetof?
Sun, 25 Feb 2024 19:37:41 -0600
Jacob Bachmeyer <[email protected]> • #17932
Re: Is it safe to use ax_gcc_builtin to detect __builtin_offsetof?
Sun, 25 Feb 2024 14:23:50 -0500
Nick Bowler <[email protected]> • #17931
Re: Is it safe to use ax_gcc_builtin to detect __builtin_offsetof?
Sun, 25 Feb 2024 08:09:53 -0500
"Zack Weinberg" <[email protected]> • #17930
Re: Is it safe to use ax_gcc_builtin to detect __builtin_offsetof?
Sun, 25 Feb 2024 10:32:18 +0000
Peter Hull <[email protected]> • #17929
Re: Is it safe to use ax_gcc_builtin to detect __builtin_offsetof?
Sun, 25 Feb 2024 00:03:04 -0800
pluto--- via Discussion list for the autoconf build system <[email protected]> • #17928
Re: Is it safe to use ax_gcc_builtin to detect __builtin_offsetof?
Sun, 25 Feb 2024 02:28:56 -0500
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #17927
Is it safe to use ax_gcc_builtin to detect __builtin_offsetof?
Sun, 25 Feb 2024 02:09:15 -0500
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #17926
Re: Android and iOS triplets are not recognized
Mon, 29 Jan 2024 08:41:04 -0500
Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> • #17925
Re: Android and iOS triplets are not recognized
Sun, 28 Jan 2024 23:24:28 -0800
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #17924
Re: Android and iOS triplets are not recognized
Mon, 29 Jan 2024 01:36:47 -0500
Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> • #17923
Re: Embed newlines in AC_MSG_* output
Sat, 27 Jan 2024 21:32:54 -0500
Nick Bowler <[email protected]> • #17922
Re: Embed newlines in AC_MSG_* output
Sat, 27 Jan 2024 12:51:27 -0800
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #17921
Embed newlines in AC_MSG_* output
Sat, 27 Jan 2024 20:46:21 +0000
Dave Hart <[email protected]> • #17920
Unavailable due to hardware problems
Tue, 23 Jan 2024 22:29:39 -0500
"Zack Weinberg" <[email protected]> • #17919
Re: bug#68274: automake 1.16j nonnumerical version confuses scripts
Wed, 17 Jan 2024 03:24:58 +0000
Sam James <[email protected]> • #17918
Re: bug#68274: automake 1.16j nonnumerical version confuses scripts
Tue, 16 Jan 2024 21:48:48 -0500
"Zack Weinberg" <[email protected]> • #17917
Re: Future plans for Autotools
Fri, 29 Dec 2023 12:08:10 -0500
Michael Orlitzky <[email protected]> • #17916
Re: Future plans for Autotools
Fri, 29 Dec 2023 03:59:38 +0000
Adam Faiz via Discussion list for the autoconf build system <[email protected]> • #17915
autoconf-2.72 released [stable]
Fri, 22 Dec 2023 14:14:57 -0500
"Zack Weinberg" <[email protected]> • #17914
Re: AT_MTIME_DELAY not working?
Fri, 22 Dec 2023 11:22:16 -0500
"Zack Weinberg" <[email protected]> • #17913
Re: AT_MTIME_DELAY not working?
Fri, 22 Dec 2023 10:08:55 -0500
Nick Bowler <[email protected]> • #17912
Re: AT_MTIME_DELAY not working? (was: Re: [platform-testers] autoconf-2.72e released [release candidate])
Fri, 22 Dec 2023 09:28:03 -0500
"Zack Weinberg" <[email protected]> • #17911
AT_MTIME_DELAY not working? (was: Re: [platform-testers] autoconf-2.72e released [release candidate])
Thu, 21 Dec 2023 21:07:17 -0600
Jacob Bachmeyer <[email protected]> • #17910
Re: autoconf-2.72e released [release candidate]
Thu, 21 Dec 2023 08:56:11 -0500
"Zack Weinberg" <[email protected]> • #17909
Re: [platform-testers] autoconf-2.72e released [release candidate]
Thu, 21 Dec 2023 08:54:20 -0500
"Zack Weinberg" <[email protected]> • #17908
Re: autoconf-2.72e released [release candidate]
Wed, 20 Dec 2023 16:41:38 -0800
Alan Coopersmith <[email protected]> • #17907
Re: [platform-testers] autoconf-2.72e released [release candidate]
Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:27:29 +0100
Frederic Berat <[email protected]> • #17906
Re: [platform-testers] autoconf-2.72e released [release candidate]
Wed, 20 Dec 2023 16:21:40 -0500
"Zack Weinberg" <[email protected]> • #17905
Re: [platform-testers] autoconf-2.72e released [release candidate]
Wed, 20 Dec 2023 20:03:50 +0100
Frederic Berat <[email protected]> • #17904
autoconf-2.72e released [release candidate]
Wed, 20 Dec 2023 11:16:21 -0500
Zack Weinberg <[email protected]> • #17903
Re: AC_FUNC_MMAP not testing what the comments say
Mon, 18 Dec 2023 14:05:17 -0500
"Zack Weinberg" <[email protected]> • #17902
Re: AC_FUNC_MMAP not testing what the comments say
Mon, 18 Dec 2023 19:02:35 +0000
Brooks Davis <[email protected]> • #17901
Re: AC_FUNC_MMAP not testing what the comments say
Fri, 15 Dec 2023 18:24:05 -0800
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #17900
AC_FUNC_MMAP not testing what the comments say
Fri, 15 Dec 2023 23:17:12 +0000
Brooks Davis <[email protected]> • #17899
Re: Will autoconf work with -Werror=implicit-int and -Werror=implicit-function-declaration ?
Wed, 13 Dec 2023 15:22:47 -0500
"Zack Weinberg" <[email protected]> • #17898
Re: Will autoconf work with -Werror=implicit-int and -Werror=implicit-function-declaration ?
Wed, 13 Dec 2023 19:57:35 +0000
Sam James <[email protected]> • #17897
Re: Will autoconf work with -Werror=implicit-int and -Werror=implicit-function-declaration ?
Wed, 13 Dec 2023 10:34:48 -0800
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #17896
Re: Will autoconf work with -Werror=implicit-int and -Werror=implicit-function-declaration ?
Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:24:31 +0100
Frederic Berat <[email protected]> • #17895
Re: Will autoconf work with -Werror=implicit-int and -Werror=implicit-function-declaration ?
Wed, 13 Dec 2023 15:29:24 +0100
Florian Weimer <[email protected]> • #17894
Re: Will autoconf work with -Werror=implicit-int and -Werror=implicit-function-declaration ?
Wed, 13 Dec 2023 08:23:43 -0500
"Zack Weinberg" <[email protected]> • #17893
Re: Will autoconf work with -Werror=implicit-int and -Werror=implicit-function-declaration ?
Wed, 13 Dec 2023 10:27:06 +0100
Florian Weimer <[email protected]> • #17892
Re: Yet another license clarification
Wed, 13 Dec 2023 09:17:44 +0100
Sergey Kosukhin <[email protected]> • #17891
Re: Yet another license clarification
Tue, 12 Dec 2023 17:10:09 -0500
Nick Bowler <[email protected]> • #17890
Re: Yet another license clarification
Tue, 12 Dec 2023 11:05:00 -0800
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #17889
Yet another license clarification
Tue, 12 Dec 2023 15:36:48 +0100
Sergey Kosukhin <[email protected]> • #17888
Re: Will autoconf work with -Werror=implicit-int and -Werror=implicit-function-declaration ?
Tue, 12 Dec 2023 10:32:35 +0100
Arsen Arsenović <[email protected]> • #17887
Re: Will autoconf work with -Werror=implicit-int and -Werror=implicit-function-declaration ?
Mon, 11 Dec 2023 14:33:55 -0800
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #17886
Re: Will autoconf work with -Werror=implicit-int and -Werror=implicit-function-declaration ?
Mon, 11 Dec 2023 14:18:38 -0800
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #17885
Re: Will autoconf work with -Werror=implicit-int and -Werror=implicit-function-declaration ?
Mon, 11 Dec 2023 12:01:06 -0500
"Zack Weinberg" <[email protected]> • #17884
Re: Will autoconf work with -Werror=implicit-int and -Werror=implicit-function-declaration ?
Mon, 11 Dec 2023 11:24:03 -0500
Michael Orlitzky <[email protected]> • #17883
Will autoconf work with -Werror=implicit-int and -Werror=implicit-function-declaration ?
Mon, 11 Dec 2023 10:55:55 -0500
"David A. Wheeler" <[email protected]> • #17882
Bug triage for 2.72 complete; release freeze begins now
Fri, 08 Dec 2023 15:31:50 -0500
"Zack Weinberg" <[email protected]> • #17881
Re: [platform-testers] autoconf-2.72d released [beta]
Mon, 4 Dec 2023 15:12:07 +0100
Frederic Berat <[email protected]> • #17880
Re: autoconf-2.72d released [beta]
Mon, 04 Dec 2023 08:53:20 -0500
"Zack Weinberg" <[email protected]> • #17879
Re: autoconf-2.72d released [beta]
Mon, 04 Dec 2023 11:28:46 +0000
Richard Purdie <[email protected]> • #17878
New branch zack/ac-prog-lex-rewrite, please test
Sun, 03 Dec 2023 12:56:48 -0500
"Zack Weinberg" <[email protected]> • #17877
autoconf-2.72d released [beta]
Thu, 30 Nov 2023 16:51:35 -0500
"Zack Weinberg" <[email protected]> • #17876
Re: Evaluating arithmetic expressions with macros (eval)
Mon, 16 Oct 2023 13:06:28 -0500
Eric Blake <[email protected]> • #17875
Re: Evaluating arithmetic expressions with macros (eval)
Thu, 12 Oct 2023 16:33:54 +0100
Peter Hull <[email protected]> • #17874
Re: Evaluating arithmetic expressions with macros (eval)
Thu, 12 Oct 2023 16:56:16 +0200
Sébastien Hinderer <[email protected]> • #17873
Re: Evaluating arithmetic expressions with macros (eval)
Thu, 12 Oct 2023 15:04:25 +0100
Peter Hull <[email protected]> • #17872
Re: Evaluating arithmetic expressions with macros (eval)
Thu, 12 Oct 2023 15:40:16 +0200
Sébastien Hinderer <[email protected]> • #17871
Re: How to get autoconf to respect CC="gcc -std=c89"?
Wed, 11 Oct 2023 20:54:48 +0200
Niels Möller <[email protected]> • #17870
Re: How to get autoconf to respect CC="gcc -std=c89"?
Wed, 11 Oct 2023 11:01:47 -0400
"Zack Weinberg" <[email protected]> • #17869
Re: How to get autoconf to respect CC="gcc -std=c89"?
Wed, 11 Oct 2023 17:47:58 +0300
Evgeny Grin <[email protected]> • #17868
Re: How to get autoconf to respect CC="gcc -std=c89"?
Wed, 11 Oct 2023 10:10:27 -0400
"Zack Weinberg" <[email protected]> • #17867
Re: How to get autoconf to respect CC="gcc -std=c89"?
Wed, 11 Oct 2023 16:34:30 +0300
Evgeny Grin <[email protected]> • #17866
Re: How to get autoconf to respect CC="gcc -std=c89"?
Wed, 11 Oct 2023 08:29:55 -0500 (CDT)
Bob Friesenhahn <[email protected]> • #17865
Re: How to get autoconf to respect CC="gcc -std=c89"?
Wed, 11 Oct 2023 15:27:21 +0300
Evgeny Grin <[email protected]> • #17864
Re: How to get autoconf to respect CC="gcc -std=c89"?
Wed, 11 Oct 2023 09:43:41 +0200
Niels Möller <[email protected]> • #17863
Re: How to get autoconf to respect CC="gcc -std=c89"?
Mon, 9 Oct 2023 03:49:03 -0400
Nick Bowler <[email protected]> • #17862
Re: How to get autoconf to respect CC="gcc -std=c89"?
Sun, 08 Oct 2023 22:43:42 -0500
Jacob Bachmeyer <[email protected]> • #17861
Re: How to get autoconf to respect CC="gcc -std=c89"?
Sun, 08 Oct 2023 14:33:36 +0200
Niels Möller <[email protected]> • #17860
Re: How to get autoconf to respect CC="gcc -std=c89"?
Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:36:48 -0500
Jacob Bachmeyer <[email protected]> • #17859
Re: How to get autoconf to respect CC="gcc -std=c89"?
Sun, 08 Oct 2023 00:15:47 +0300
Evgeny Grin <[email protected]> • #17858
Re: How to get autoconf to respect CC="gcc -std=c89"?
Sat, 7 Oct 2023 14:16:21 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #17857
Re: How to get autoconf to respect CC="gcc -std=c89"?
Sat, 07 Oct 2023 11:03:06 +0200
Niels Möller <[email protected]> • #17856
Re: How to get autoconf to respect CC="gcc -std=c89"?
Fri, 6 Oct 2023 17:08:38 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #17855
Re: How to get autoconf to respect CC="gcc -std=c89"?
Fri, 06 Oct 2023 20:11:28 +0200
Niels Möller <[email protected]> • #17854
Re: How to get autoconf to respect CC="gcc -std=c89"?
Fri, 6 Oct 2023 11:04:50 -0500 (CDT)
Bob Friesenhahn <[email protected]> • #17853
Re: How to get autoconf to respect CC="gcc -std=c89"?
Fri, 06 Oct 2023 18:03:25 +0200
Niels Möller <[email protected]> • #17852
Re: How to get autoconf to respect CC="gcc -std=c89"?
Fri, 06 Oct 2023 11:15:38 -0400
"Zack Weinberg" <[email protected]> • #17851
How to get autoconf to respect CC="gcc -std=c89"?
Thu, 05 Oct 2023 22:31:58 +0200
Niels Möller <[email protected]> • #17850
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.