gmane.comp.tex.tetex.beta archive

385 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: license violation in tetex-texmf-3.0 fixed
Mon, 29 May 2006 08:41:44 -0300
[email protected] • #833
Re: license violation in tetex-texmf-3.0 fixed
Mon, 29 May 2006 10:37:31 +0200
Frank Küster <[email protected]> • #832
Re: license violation in tetex-texmf-3.0 fixed
Mon, 29 May 2006 09:39:14 +0200
Hans Hagen <[email protected]> • #831
Re: license violation in tetex-texmf-3.0 fixed
Mon, 29 May 2006 16:52:33 +0900
"djh" <[email protected]> • #830
Re: license violation in tetex-texmf-3.0 fixed
Mon, 29 May 2006 09:33:51 +0200
David Kastrup <[email protected]> • #829
Re: license violation in tetex-texmf-3.0 fixed
Mon, 29 May 2006 11:14:29 +0900
"djh" <[email protected]> • #828
Re: license violation in tetex-texmf-3.0 fixed
Sat, 27 May 2006 12:00:13 -0300
[email protected] • #827
Re: license violation in tetex-texmf-3.0 fixed
Sat, 27 May 2006 13:19:49 +0100
Robin Fairbairns <[email protected]> • #826
Re: license violation in tetex-texmf-3.0 fixed
Sat, 27 May 2006 08:52:45 -0300
[email protected] • #825
Re: license violation in tetex-texmf-3.0 fixed
Sat, 27 May 2006 11:53:12 +0200
Ralf Stubner <[email protected]> • #824
Re: license violation in tetex-texmf-3.0 fixed
Fri, 26 May 2006 17:06:09 +0200
David Kastrup <[email protected]> • #823
Re: license violation in tetex-texmf-3.0 fixed
Fri, 26 May 2006 14:13:21 +0200
Frank Küster <[email protected]> • #822
Re: license violation in tetex-texmf-3.0 fixed
Fri, 26 May 2006 14:46:51 +0200
David Kastrup <[email protected]> • #821
Re: license violation in tetex-texmf-3.0 fixed
Fri, 26 May 2006 12:01:45 +0100
Robin Fairbairns <[email protected]> • #820
Re: license violation in tetex-texmf-3.0 fixed
Fri, 26 May 2006 08:34:52 -0300
[email protected] • #819
Re: license violation in tetex-texmf-3.0 fixed
Fri, 26 May 2006 12:43:44 +0200 (CEST)
Petr Olsak <[email protected]> • #818
license violation in tetex-texmf-3.0 fixed
Thu, 25 May 2006 19:30:58 +0200
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #817
Re: teTeX: no next release
Mon, 22 May 2006 19:26:09 -0700
Michael Peters <[email protected]> • #816
Re: teTeX: no next release
Mon, 22 May 2006 13:31:03 +0200
David Kastrup <[email protected]> • #815
Re: teTeX: no next release
Mon, 22 May 2006 12:24:50 +0100
Julian Gilbey <[email protected]> • #814
Re: teTeX: no next release
Mon, 22 May 2006 12:02:07 +0200
Luis Seidel <[email protected]> • #813
teTeX: no next release
Mon, 22 May 2006 10:38:21 +0200
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #812
teTeX future (?)
Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:42:26 +0400
"Mikhail Vidiassov" <[email protected]> • #811
Re: vntex-3
Mon, 26 Sep 2005 16:47:18 -0500
[email protected] (Karl Berry) • #810
vntex-3
Mon, 26 Sep 2005 21:37:39 +0200
Reinhard Kotucha <[email protected]> • #809
Re: ifpdf.sty
Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:29:07 +0200
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #808
Re: ifpdf.sty
Fri, 17 Jun 2005 13:58:40 +0200
Heiko Oberdiek <[email protected]> • #807
Re: ifpdf.sty
Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:42:57 +0200
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #806
ifpdf.sty
Thu, 7 Apr 2005 22:09:06 +0200
Reinhard Kotucha <[email protected]> • #805
Re: mf-nowin, mfw and mf
Fri, 11 Feb 2005 00:28:56 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #804
Re: mf-nowin, mfw and mf
Fri, 11 Feb 2005 02:10:25 +0300
Vladimir Volovich <[email protected]> • #803
Re: mf-nowin, mfw and mf
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 18:18:35 +0100
Giuseppe Ghibò <[email protected]> • #802
Re: texconfig action and site-wide changes
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 20:17:42 +0100 (CET)
Hartmut Henkel <[email protected]> • #801
Re: texconfig action and site-wide changes
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 08:02:48 -0500
"David R. Morrison" <[email protected]> • #800
Re: texconfig action and site-wide changes
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 20:29:44 -0400 (AST)
"George N. White III" <[email protected]> • #799
Re: texconfig action and site-wide changes
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:57:02 -0400 (AST)
"George N. White III" <[email protected]> • #798
Re: texconfig action and site-wide changes
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 20:08:06 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #797
teTeX-3.0 - unfixed overflows in xpdf
Tue, 08 Feb 2005 17:40:41 +0100
Jindrich Novy <[email protected]> • #796
Re: texconfig action and site-wide changes
Tue, 08 Feb 2005 17:54:24 +0100
[email protected] (Frank Küster) • #795
Re: texconfig action and site-wide changes
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:40:15 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #794
Re: texconfig action and site-wide changes
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 08:53:41 -0400 (AST)
George White <[email protected]> • #793
Re: 2.99.7 ConTeXt, URW-Fonts
Tue, 08 Feb 2005 12:09:23 +0100
Hans Hagen <[email protected]> • #792
Re: cygwin: lilypond and tetex-3.0
Tue, 08 Feb 2005 11:12:36 +0100
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]> • #791
Re: cygwin: lilypond and tetex-3.0
Tue, 08 Feb 2005 10:33:38 +0100
Frank Küster <[email protected]> • #790
Re: cygwin: lilypond and tetex-3.0
Tue, 08 Feb 2005 09:38:12 +0100
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]> • #789
Re: texconfig action and site-wide changes
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 08:50:49 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #788
Re: cygwin: lilypond and tetex-3.0
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 07:23:41 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #787
Re: mf-nowin, mfw and mf
Mon, 7 Feb 2005 19:42:17 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #786
mf-nowin, mfw and mf
Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:10:14 +0100
Giuseppe Ghibò <[email protected]> • #785
Re: 2.99.7 ConTeXt, URW-Fonts
Mon, 7 Feb 2005 17:57:47 +0100
Martin Schröder <[email protected]> • #784
Re: cygwin: lilypond and tetex-3.0
Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:41:16 +0100
Bertalan Fodor <[email protected]> • #783
Re: cygwin: lilypond and tetex-3.0
Mon, 07 Feb 2005 11:02:49 +0100
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]> • #782
texconfig action and site-wide changes
Sun, 06 Feb 2005 21:07:29 +0100
[email protected] (Frank Küster) • #781
teTeX-3.0
Sun, 6 Feb 2005 21:46:18 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #780
teTeX-3.0
Sun, 6 Feb 2005 21:28:24 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #779
2.99.13 compiles under Mac OS X 10.3.7
Sat, 5 Feb 2005 13:31:57 +0100
Artemio Gonzalez Lopez <[email protected]> • #778
Re: 2.99.13
Sat, 5 Feb 2005 10:32:45 +0100
VnPenguin <[email protected]> • #777
2.99.13 compiles under Irix
Fri, 4 Feb 2005 22:13:59 -0500 (EST)
ezra peisach <[email protected]> • #776
2.99.13
Fri, 4 Feb 2005 23:51:11 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #775
Re: 2.99.12
Fri, 4 Feb 2005 23:05:36 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #774
Re: 2.99.11: yet another release candidate
Fri, 4 Feb 2005 22:49:47 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #773
2.99.12 works on Solaris 9 (SPARC) w/ GCC 3.3.4
Fri, 04 Feb 2005 14:12:33 -0600
Rodney Sparapani <[email protected]> • #772
Re: 2.99.12
Fri, 04 Feb 2005 16:51:29 +0100
Morten Høgholm <[email protected]> • #771
Re: 2.99.12 (Irix failure)
Fri, 4 Feb 2005 15:22:26 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #770
Some minor issues
Fri, 04 Feb 2005 14:21:28 +0100
[email protected] (Frank Küster) • #769
Re: 2.99.12 (Irix failure)
Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:32:26 -0500 (EST)
ezra peisach <[email protected]> • #768
Re: 2.99.11: yet another release candidate
Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:30:23 +0100
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]> • #767
Re: 2.99.11: yet another release candidate
Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:24:50 +0100
Erik Frisk <[email protected]> • #766
Re: 2.99.12 (Irix failure)
Fri, 4 Feb 2005 08:38:19 +0100
Bernd Melchers <[email protected]> • #765
Re: 2.99.12
Fri, 04 Feb 2005 12:22:07 +0100
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]> • #764
Re: 2.99.12 (Irix failure)
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:34:51 -0500 (EST)
ezra peisach <[email protected]> • #763
Re: 2.99.12
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 23:55:48 +0100
VnPenguin <[email protected]> • #762
Re: 2.99.12
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 23:37:20 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #761
2.99.12
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:17:46 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #760
Re: texi2html new try
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:30:40 -0500 (EST)
ezra peisach <[email protected]> • #759
Re: texi2html new try
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:16:39 -0000 (UTC)
<[email protected]> • #758
Re: 2.99.11: Compilation under irix broken
Thu, 03 Feb 2005 09:36:00 -0500
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #757
Re: 2.99.11: Compilation under irix broken
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:25:08 -0000 (UTC)
<[email protected]> • #756
Re: 2.99.11: Compilation under irix broken
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:07:58 -0500 (EST)
ezra peisach <[email protected]> • #755
Re: 2.99.11: Compilation under irix broken
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 06:39:51 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #754
2.99.11: Compilation under irix broken
Wed, 2 Feb 2005 18:35:56 -0500 (EST)
ezra peisach <[email protected]> • #753
Re: Info about texconfig
Tue, 1 Feb 2005 22:26:40 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #752
Re: 2.99.11: yet another release candidate
Tue, 1 Feb 2005 21:32:12 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #751
Re: 2.99.11: yet another release candidate
Tue, 01 Feb 2005 11:54:24 +0100
Erik Frisk <[email protected]> • #750
Re: [[email protected]: Re: [[email protected]: Re: 2.99.10: another release candidate]]
Tue, 01 Feb 2005 10:01:46 +0100
Jindrich Novy <[email protected]> • #749
Re: 2.99.11: yet another release candidate
Tue, 01 Feb 2005 09:11:07 +0100
David Kastrup <[email protected]> • #748
Re: 2.99.11: yet another release candidate
Tue, 1 Feb 2005 08:42:14 +0100
Willi Burmeister <[email protected]> • #747
Re: 2.99.11: yet another release candidate
Tue, 01 Feb 2005 07:13:35 +0100
David Kastrup <[email protected]> • #746
Re: 2.99.11: yet another release candidate
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 23:54:37 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #745
small update to 2.99.11 (note the added "b" in the filename after the date)
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 23:35:50 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #744
Re: 2.99.11: yet another release candidate
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 22:32:06 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #743
Re: 2.99.11: yet another release candidate
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 22:29:59 +0100
Willi Burmeister <[email protected]> • #742
Re: 2.99.11: yet another release candidate
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 22:11:17 +0100 (CET)
Hartmut Henkel <[email protected]> • #741
2.99.11: problem with texmf-local : file not found
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 21:31:56 +0100
VnPenguin <[email protected]> • #740
Re: 2.99.11: yet another release candidate
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 21:23:30 +0100
David Kastrup <[email protected]> • #739
Re: 2.99.11: yet another release candidate
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 20:42:34 +0100 (CET)
Hartmut Henkel <[email protected]> • #738
[[email protected]: Re: [[email protected]: Re: 2.99.10: another release candidate]]
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 19:56:56 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #737
Re: 2.99.11: yet another release candidate
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 19:25:35 +0100
VnPenguin <[email protected]> • #736
Re: 2.99.11: yet another release candidate
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:47:22 +0100
Artemio Gonzalez Lopez <[email protected]> • #735
2.99.11: configure script broken
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:28:00 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #734
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.