gmane.comp.type-setting.lout archive

367 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →

pandoc lua filter for Lout?
Thu, 26 Feb 2026 14:19:23 -0500
Daniel Ajoy <[email protected]> • #2385
Re: Typst (Re: OT: Rakudoc: Another markup language of possible interest)
Wed, 25 Feb 2026 16:44:29 -0600
Blake McBride <[email protected]> • #2384
Re: Typst (Re: OT: Rakudoc: Another markup language of possible interest)
Wed, 25 Feb 2026 16:43:27 -0600
Blake McBride via "Users of the Lout document typesetting system." <[email protected]> • #2383
Typst (Re: OT: Rakudoc: Another markup language of possible interest)
Wed, 25 Feb 2026 20:27:01 +0100
Oliver Bandel <[email protected]> • #2382
Re: OT: Rakudoc: Another markup language of possible interest
Wed, 25 Feb 2026 05:38:35 -0600
Blake McBride <[email protected]> • #2381
OT: Rakudoc: Another markup language of possible interest
Tue, 24 Feb 2026 15:10:01 -1000
Joel Roth <[email protected]> • #2380
Re: Lout typesetting questions
Mon, 10 Nov 2025 22:45:18 +0100
Martin Michel <[email protected]> • #2379
Re: Lout typesetting questions
Tue, 11 Nov 2025 09:53:01 +0300
Valery Ushakov <[email protected]> • #2378
Re: Lout typesetting questions
Mon, 10 Nov 2025 20:38:48 +0000
William Bader <[email protected]> • #2377
Re: Lout typesetting questions
Mon, 10 Nov 2025 07:34:14 +0000
Mark Summerfield <[email protected]> • #2376
Re: Lout typesetting questions
Mon, 10 Nov 2025 00:04:48 +0000
William Bader <[email protected]> • #2375
Re: where is the latest source of Lout for Linux?
Sun, 09 Nov 2025 13:39:07 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #2374
Re: Lout typesetting questions
Sun, 09 Nov 2025 22:21:54 +0100
Matěj Cepl <[email protected]> • #2373
Re: where is the latest source of Lout for Linux?
Sun, 09 Nov 2025 19:23:44 +0100
Matěj Cepl <[email protected]> • #2372
Re: where is the latest source of Lout for Linux?
Sun, 09 Nov 2025 18:08:56 +0100
Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> • #2371
Re: Lout typesetting questions
Sun, 9 Nov 2025 17:29:45 +0300
Valery Ushakov <[email protected]> • #2370
Lout typesetting questions
Sun, 09 Nov 2025 12:22:18 +0100
Basile Starynkevitch <[email protected]> • #2369
where is the latest source of Lout for Linux?
Sun, 09 Nov 2025 11:16:18 +0100
Basile Starynkevitch <[email protected]> • #2368
Re: Build errors with GCC 14
Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:18:07 +0200
Matěj Cepl <[email protected]> • #2367
Re: Build errors with GCC 14
Tue, 23 Sep 2025 21:51:24 +0000
Jeffrey Kingston <[email protected]> • #2366
Re: Build errors with GCC 14
Tue, 23 Sep 2025 16:41:39 +0000
William Bader <[email protected]> • #2365
Re: Build errors with GCC 14
Tue, 23 Sep 2025 01:27:49 +0200
Matěj Cepl <[email protected]> • #2364
Re: Build errors with GCC 14
Mon, 22 Sep 2025 20:19:20 +0000
William Bader <[email protected]> • #2363
Re: Build errors with GCC 14
Mon, 22 Sep 2025 19:58:28 +0000
Jeffrey Kingston <[email protected]> • #2362
Re: Build errors with GCC 14
Mon, 22 Sep 2025 12:19:30 +0000
William Bader <[email protected]> • #2361
Re: Build errors with GCC 14
Mon, 22 Sep 2025 09:18:30 +0200
Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> • #2360
Re: Build errors with GCC 14
Mon, 22 Sep 2025 03:58:02 +0000
William Bader <[email protected]> • #2359
Re: Build errors with GCC 14
Mon, 22 Sep 2025 01:50:16 +0200
Matěj Cepl <[email protected]> • #2358
Re: Build errors with GCC 14
Tue, 20 May 2025 15:20:24 +0200
Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> • #2357
Re: Build errors with GCC 14
Wed, 30 Apr 2025 12:21:28 +0200
Matěj Cepl <[email protected]> • #2356
[PATCH] Allow to override build date with SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
Wed, 30 Apr 2025 12:16:04 +0200
Matěj Cepl <[email protected]> • #2355
Re: External links in PDF?
Fri, 4 Apr 2025 01:59:03 +0300
Valery Ushakov <[email protected]> • #2354
Re: External links in PDF?
Thu, 03 Apr 2025 17:36:43 +0100
Mark Carroll <[email protected]> • #2353
External links in PDF?
Thu, 03 Apr 2025 16:04:20 +0100
Mark Carroll <[email protected]> • #2352
Re: Location of Source-Repo (Re: Build errors with GCC 14)
Fri, 24 May 2024 11:48:12 -0700
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #2351
Re: Location of Source-Repo (Re: Build errors with GCC 14)
Fri, 24 May 2024 16:34:22 +0000
William Bader <[email protected]> • #2350
Re: Location of Source-Repo (Re: Build errors with GCC 14)
Fri, 24 May 2024 10:40:05 +0200
Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> • #2349
Re: Build errors with GCC 14
Thu, 23 May 2024 22:15:36 +0200
Matěj Cepl <[email protected]> • #2348
Re: Build errors with GCC 14
Thu, 23 May 2024 03:23:42 +0000
William Bader <[email protected]> • #2347
Re: Build errors with GCC 14
Wed, 22 May 2024 17:54:27 +0200
Matěj Cepl <[email protected]> • #2346
Re: [PATCH] Make makefile working even with distro packaging systems.
Wed, 22 May 2024 02:32:53 +0000
William Bader <[email protected]> • #2345
Re: Build errors with GCC 14
Wed, 22 May 2024 02:24:26 +0000
William Bader <[email protected]> • #2344
Re: Location of Source-Repo (Re: Build errors with GCC 14)
Tue, 21 May 2024 11:17:05 -0700
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #2343
Location of Source-Repo (Re: Build errors with GCC 14)
Tue, 21 May 2024 03:54:11 +0200
Oliver Bandel <[email protected]> • #2342
Re: Build errors with GCC 14
Mon, 20 May 2024 15:38:21 -0700
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #2341
Re: Build errors with GCC 14
Mon, 20 May 2024 22:09:26 +0200
Oliver Bandel <[email protected]> • #2340
Re: Build errors with GCC 14
Sun, 19 May 2024 08:36:42 +0200
Matěj Cepl <[email protected]> • #2339
Re: Build errors with GCC 14
Sun, 19 May 2024 08:24:56 +0200
Matěj Cepl <[email protected]> • #2338
Re: Build errors with GCC 14
Sun, 19 May 2024 03:08:07 +0300
Valery Ushakov <[email protected]> • #2337
[PATCH] Make makefile working even with distro packaging systems.
Sun, 19 May 2024 01:01:24 +0200
Matěj Cepl <[email protected]> • #2336
Re: Build errors with GCC 14
Sun, 19 May 2024 01:00:44 +0200
Matěj Cepl <[email protected]> • #2335
Re: Build errors with GCC 14
Sat, 18 May 2024 21:26:33 +0000
Jeffrey Kingston <[email protected]> • #2334
Re: Build errors with GCC 14
Sat, 18 May 2024 13:07:37 -0700
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #2333
Build errors with GCC 14
Sat, 18 May 2024 18:09:33 +0200
Matěj Cepl <[email protected]> • #2332
Re: 30 years since the first public release of Lout
Sat, 3 Jun 2023 12:07:07 -0400
Wolfram Kahl <[email protected]> • #2331
Re: 30 years since the first public release of Lout
Thu, 01 Jun 2023 10:51:30 +0200
Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> • #2330
30 years since the first public release of Lout
Tue, 30 May 2023 16:59:37 +0300
Valery Ushakov <[email protected]> • #2329
Re: paragraphs inside tables
Sat, 30 Jul 2022 00:24:42 -0500
Daniel Ajoy <[email protected]> • #2328
Re: paragraphs inside tables
Fri, 29 Jul 2022 22:43:07 +0000
Jeffrey Kingston <[email protected]> • #2327
Re: paragraphs inside tables
Sat, 30 Jul 2022 01:51:25 +0300
Valery Ushakov <[email protected]> • #2326
paragraphs inside tables
Fri, 29 Jul 2022 13:34:07 -0500
Daniel Ajoy <[email protected]> • #2325
Re: Lout 3.42 (Was: wikipedia page)
Mon, 1 Nov 2021 13:34:53 +0100
Reinoud Zandijk <[email protected]> • #2324
Lout 3.42 (Was: wikipedia page)
Mon, 12 Apr 2021 00:25:35 +0000
William Bader <[email protected]> • #2323
wikipedia page
Sun, 11 Apr 2021 18:57:29 -0500
Daniel Ajoy <[email protected]> • #2322
Re: can I change font family for rest of a document
Sat, 2 Jan 2021 03:47:42 +0300
Valery Ushakov <[email protected]> • #2321
can I change font family for rest of a document
Fri, 1 Jan 2021 17:14:16 -0500
douglas mcallaster <[email protected]> • #2320
Re: lout to xyz converters?
Mon, 28 Dec 2020 19:25:16 +0100
Yannig Robert via "Users of the Lout document typesetting system." <[email protected]> • #2319
Re: lout to xyz converters?
Mon, 28 Dec 2020 10:41:31 +0000
Mark Summerfield <[email protected]> • #2318
Re: lout to xyz converters?
Mon, 28 Dec 2020 09:13:34 +0000
Mark Summerfield <[email protected]> • #2317
Re: lout to xyz converters?
Sun, 27 Dec 2020 22:06:50 +0100
Martin Michel <[email protected]> • #2316
Re: lout to xyz converters?
Fri, 25 Dec 2020 21:07:08 +0000
William Bader <[email protected]> • #2315
lout to xyz converters?
Fri, 25 Dec 2020 09:22:54 +0000
Mark Summerfield <[email protected]> • #2314
Re: Maintenance or successors? (was Re: Buffer overflow in the StringQuotedWord() function)
Fri, 18 Dec 2020 23:52:07 +0000
William Bader <[email protected]> • #2313
Re: Maintenance or successors? (was Re: Buffer overflow in the StringQuotedWord() function)
Fri, 18 Dec 2020 23:28:50 +0100
Yannig Robert via "Users of the Lout document typesetting system." <[email protected]> • #2312
Re: Maintenance or successors? (was Re: Buffer overflow in the StringQuotedWord() function)
Fri, 18 Dec 2020 15:41:12 +0000
Mark Summerfield <[email protected]> • #2311
Re: Maintenance or successors? (was Re: Buffer overflow in the StringQuotedWord() function)
Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:17:34 +0100
Yannig Robert via "Users of the Lout document typesetting system." <[email protected]> • #2310
Re: Maintenance or successors? (was Re: Buffer overflow in the StringQuotedWord() function)
Fri, 18 Dec 2020 05:01:50 +0000
William Bader <[email protected]> • #2309
Re: Maintenance or successors? (was Re: Buffer overflow in the StringQuotedWord() function)
Wed, 16 Dec 2020 11:59:45 +0100
Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> • #2308
Re: Buffer overflow in the StringQuotedWord() function
Fri, 23 Oct 2020 23:55:20 +0200
Matěj Cepl <[email protected]> • #2307
Re: Buffer overflow in the StringQuotedWord() function
Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:53:28 +0200
Matěj Cepl <[email protected]> • #2306
Re: Buffer overflow in the StringQuotedWord() function
Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:24:52 +0200
Oliver Bandel <[email protected]> • #2305
Future Plans [Was: Re: Buffer overflow in the StringQuotedWord() function]
Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:10:18 +0200
Matěj Cepl <[email protected]> • #2304
Re: Buffer overflow in the StringQuotedWord() function
Fri, 23 Oct 2020 04:19:54 +0000
William Bader <[email protected]> • #2303
Re: Buffer overflow in the StringQuotedWord() function
Fri, 23 Oct 2020 03:20:47 +0200
Oliver Bandel <[email protected]> • #2302
Re: Buffer overflow in the StringQuotedWord() function
Thu, 22 Oct 2020 22:55:28 +0000
William Bader <[email protected]> • #2301
Re: Buffer overflow in the StringQuotedWord() function
Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:07:44 +0200
Oliver Bandel <[email protected]> • #2300
Re: Buffer overflow in the StringQuotedWord() function
Thu, 22 Oct 2020 12:57:30 +0200
Oliver Bandel <[email protected]> • #2299
Re: Buffer overflow in the StringQuotedWord() function
Thu, 22 Oct 2020 12:28:59 +0200
Matěj Cepl <[email protected]> • #2298
Re: Buffer overflow in the StringQuotedWord() function
Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:54:47 +0200
Reinoud Zandijk <[email protected]> • #2297
Re: Buffer overflow in the StringQuotedWord() function
Thu, 22 Oct 2020 08:09:24 +0200
Matěj Cepl <[email protected]> • #2296
Re: Buffer overflow in the StringQuotedWord() function
Thu, 22 Oct 2020 07:58:42 +0200
Matěj Cepl <[email protected]> • #2295
Re: Buffer overflow in the StringQuotedWord() function
Thu, 22 Oct 2020 04:42:32 +0000
William Bader <[email protected]> • #2294
Re: Buffer overflow in the StringQuotedWord() function
Thu, 22 Oct 2020 03:02:36 +0200
Oliver Bandel <[email protected]> • #2293
Re: Buffer overflow in the StringQuotedWord() function
Thu, 22 Oct 2020 02:47:49 +0200
Oliver Bandel <[email protected]> • #2292
Re: Buffer overflow in the StringQuotedWord() function
Wed, 21 Oct 2020 03:37:15 +0000
William Bader <[email protected]> • #2291
Maintenance or successors? (was Re: Buffer overflow in the StringQuotedWord() function)
Wed, 21 Oct 2020 04:23:24 +0100
Mark Carroll <[email protected]> • #2290
Re: Buffer overflow in the StringQuotedWord() function
Tue, 20 Oct 2020 23:52:28 +0000
Jeffrey Kingston <[email protected]> • #2289
Re: Buffer overflow in the StringQuotedWord() function
Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:20:48 +0200
Matěj Cepl <[email protected]> • #2288
Experiments with @Graph
Sun, 28 Jun 2020 19:39:57 +0200
[email protected] • #2287
Re: Rectangular zones in graphs
Sat, 20 Jun 2020 23:19:55 +0200
Martin Michel <[email protected]> • #2286
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.