gmane.comp.version-control.cvs.bugs archive

843 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 9). Latest articles →

Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10
Mon, 9 May 2005 18:37:14 +0200
Matthias Kurz <[email protected]> • #4200
Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10
Mon, 9 May 2005 19:19:02 +0200
Matthias Kurz <[email protected]> • #4199
Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10
Mon, 9 May 2005 17:48:09 +0200
Matthias Kurz <[email protected]> • #4198
Re: Re: getopt and Solaris 10
Mon, 09 May 2005 13:22:14 -0400
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4197
Re: Re: getopt and Solaris 10
Mon, 09 May 2005 13:30:53 -0400
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4196
Re: Re: getopt and Solaris 10
Mon, 09 May 2005 13:10:04 -0400
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4195
Re: Re: getopt and Solaris 10
Mon, 09 May 2005 12:26:58 -0400
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4194
Re: Re: getopt and Solaris 10
Mon, 09 May 2005 11:06:07 -0400
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4193
Re: Build CVS (TRUNK) failed.
Sat, 07 May 2005 15:49:17 -0400
Jim Hyslop <[email protected]> • #4192
Re: Build CVS (TRUNK) failed.
Sat, 07 May 2005 01:10:05 -0700
"Mark D. Baushke" <[email protected]> • #4191
Re: Build CVS (TRUNK) failed.
Fri, 06 May 2005 14:40:14 -0400
Jim Hyslop <[email protected]> • #4190
Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10
Fri, 6 May 2005 11:49:07 +0200
Matthias Kurz <[email protected]> • #4189
Re: Build CVS (TRUNK) failed.
Fri, 06 May 2005 00:16:47 -0700
"Mark D. Baushke" <[email protected]> • #4188
Re: Re: getopt and Solaris 10
Thu, 05 May 2005 18:04:40 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #4187
Re: Re: getopt and Solaris 10
Thu, 05 May 2005 16:23:12 -0400
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4186
Re: getopt and Solaris 10
Thu, 05 May 2005 14:55:42 -0400
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4185
Re: getopt and Solaris 10
Thu, 05 May 2005 14:28:30 -0400
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4184
Re: getopt and Solaris 10
Thu, 5 May 2005 19:06:47 +0100
James Youngman <[email protected]> • #4183
getopt and Solaris 10
Thu, 05 May 2005 13:34:24 -0400
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4182
Re: Re: [PATCH] mmap-anon.m4: use proper macro & condition
Mon, 02 May 2005 00:25:50 -0700
"Mark D. Baushke" <[email protected]> • #4178
Re: Re: [PATCH] mmap-anon.m4: use proper macro & condition
Sun, 01 May 2005 22:04:45 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #4177
Re: Re: [PATCH] mmap-anon.m4: use proper macro & condition
Mon, 2 May 2005 19:04:55 +0900
Moriyoshi Koizumi <[email protected]> • #4176
Re: Re: [PATCH] mmap-anon.m4: use proper macro & condition
Sun, 01 May 2005 08:14:13 -0700
"Mark D. Baushke" <[email protected]> • #4175
Re: [PATCH] mmap-anon.m4: use proper macro & condition
Mon, 25 Apr 2005 12:08:13 +0900
Moriyoshi Koizumi <[email protected]> • #4174
Re: [PATCH] mmap-anon.m4: use proper macro & condition
Sat, 23 Apr 2005 21:55:57 -0700
"Mark D. Baushke" <[email protected]> • #4173
Re: ylwrap should be included for any Yacc compilations.
Tue, 19 Apr 2005 00:20:26 +0200
Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[email protected]> • #4166
Re: CVS Feature Version 1.12.12 Released! * Security Update *
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:05:44 -0400
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4165
CVS Feature Version 1.12.12 Released! * Security Update *
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:02:40 -0400
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4164
Stable CVS Version 1.11.20 Released! <strong>Security Update</strong>
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 14:32:27 -0400
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4163
Re: ylwrap should be included for any Yacc compilations.
Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:30:35 +0200
Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[email protected]> • #4160
Re: ylwrap should be included for any Yacc compilations.
Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:23:39 +0200
Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[email protected]> • #4158
Re: Large CVS Installations
Sun, 27 Mar 2005 20:54:46 -0800
Rachel Burns <[email protected]> • #4157
Re: Large CVS Installations
Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:08:21 -0500 (EST)
[email protected] (Larry Jones) • #4156
Large CVS Installations
Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:46:31 -0600
"DHARNA, AJAY [AG/1000]" <[email protected]> • #4155
Re: GNULib save-cwd.c on Windows & Visual Studio 6.0
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:58:28 +0100
Jim Meyering <[email protected]> • #4153
RE: GNULib save-cwd.c on Windows & Visual Studio 6.0
Wed, 9 Mar 2005 19:04:10 -0800
"Conrad T. Pino" <[email protected]> • #4152
Re: GNULib save-cwd.c on Windows & Visual Studio 6.0
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:26:03 +0100
Jim Meyering <[email protected]> • #4151
Re: RE: GNULib save-cwd.c on Windows & Visual Studio 6.0
Wed, 9 Mar 2005 21:23:30 +0000
James Youngman <[email protected]> • #4150
RE: GNULib save-cwd.c on Windows & Visual Studio 6.0
Wed, 9 Mar 2005 06:56:43 -0800
"Conrad T. Pino" <[email protected]> • #4149
RE: GNULib save-cwd.c on Windows & Visual Studio 6.0
Wed, 9 Mar 2005 06:22:56 -0800
"Conrad T. Pino" <[email protected]> • #4148
Re: GNULIB wait-process module.
Wed, 09 Mar 2005 08:39:09 -0500
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4147
Re: GNULib save-cwd.c on Windows & Visual Studio 6.0
Tue, 8 Mar 2005 16:52:17 +0100
Frank Hemer <[email protected]> • #4146
RE: GNULib save-cwd.c on Windows & Visual Studio 6.0
Tue, 8 Mar 2005 11:05:00 -0500
"Jim.Hyslop" <[email protected]> • #4145
RE: GNULib save-cwd.c on Windows & Visual Studio 6.0
Tue, 8 Mar 2005 09:26:47 -0500
"Jim.Hyslop" <[email protected]> • #4144
Re: GNULib save-cwd.c on Windows & Visual Studio 6.0
Wed, 09 Mar 2005 09:04:48 +0100
Jim Meyering <[email protected]> • #4143
Re: GNULIB wait-process module.
Tue, 8 Mar 2005 21:53:23 +0100
Bruno Haible <[email protected]> • #4142
Re: GNULIB wait-process module.
Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:52:23 -0500
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4141
Re: GNULib save-cwd.c on Windows & Visual Studio 6.0
Tue, 08 Mar 2005 11:58:59 -0500
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4140
Re: GNULib save-cwd.c on Windows & Visual Studio 6.0
Tue, 08 Mar 2005 17:35:55 +0100
Jim Meyering <[email protected]> • #4139
Re: GNULib save-cwd.c on Windows & Visual Studio 6.0
Tue, 08 Mar 2005 10:37:15 -0500
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4138
Re: GNULib save-cwd.c on Windows & Visual Studio 6.0
Tue, 08 Mar 2005 09:24:21 +0100
Jim Meyering <[email protected]> • #4137
GNULib save-cwd.c on Windows & Visual Studio 6.0
Mon, 7 Mar 2005 22:24:06 -0800
"Conrad T. Pino" <[email protected]> • #4136
RE: GNULIB wait-process module.
Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:41:22 -0500
"Jim.Hyslop" <[email protected]> • #4135
Re: GNULIB wait-process module.
Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:36:21 -0500 (EST)
[email protected] (Larry Jones) • #4134
Re: GNULIB wait-process module.
Fri, 04 Mar 2005 11:28:13 -0500
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4133
Re: valloc()?
Fri, 04 Mar 2005 10:44:02 -0500
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4132
Re: GNULIB wait-process module.
Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:32:09 +0100
Bruno Haible <[email protected]> • #4131
Re: valloc()?
Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:20:29 +0100
Bruno Haible <[email protected]> • #4130
Re: valloc()?
Thu, 03 Mar 2005 16:22:45 -0500
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4129
Re: valloc()?
Thu, 3 Mar 2005 21:47:51 +0100
Bruno Haible <[email protected]> • #4128
GNULIB wait-process module.
Thu, 03 Mar 2005 15:52:19 -0500
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4127
Re: valloc()?
Thu, 03 Mar 2005 15:54:08 -0500
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4126
Re: valloc()?
Thu, 3 Mar 2005 21:36:11 +0100
Bruno Haible <[email protected]> • #4125
Re: valloc()?
Thu, 03 Mar 2005 14:40:21 -0500
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4124
Re: valloc()?
Thu, 03 Mar 2005 14:02:20 -0500
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4123
Re: valloc()?
Thu, 3 Mar 2005 19:19:34 +0100
Bruno Haible <[email protected]> • #4122
Re: valloc()?
Thu, 03 Mar 2005 12:27:28 -0500
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4121
Re: valloc()?
Thu, 3 Mar 2005 17:31:56 +0100
Bruno Haible <[email protected]> • #4120
Re: valloc()?
Thu, 3 Mar 2005 17:26:59 +0100
Bruno Haible <[email protected]> • #4119
Re: valloc()?
Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:08:22 -0500 (EST)
[email protected] (Larry Jones) • #4118
Re: valloc()?
Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:26:02 -0500
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4117
Re: valloc()?
Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:03:57 +0100
Bruno Haible <[email protected]> • #4116
Re: valloc()?
Thu, 3 Mar 2005 13:28:23 +0100
Bruno Haible <[email protected]> • #4115
Re: valloc()?
Thu, 03 Mar 2005 01:13:22 -0500
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4114
Re: valloc()?
Wed, 02 Mar 2005 19:20:32 -0500
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4113
Re: valloc()?
Wed, 02 Mar 2005 10:56:09 -0500
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4112
Re: valloc()?
Wed, 02 Mar 2005 14:45:29 -0500
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4111
Re: valloc()?
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 18:58:17 +0100
Bruno Haible <[email protected]> • #4110
Re: valloc()?
Wed, 02 Mar 2005 11:49:59 -0500
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4109
Re: valloc()?
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 13:00:33 +0100
Bruno Haible <[email protected]> • #4108
valloc()?
Tue, 01 Mar 2005 19:01:32 -0500
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #4107
Re: fix xgethostname on OSX [patch]
Sun, 20 Feb 2005 17:39:22 +0100
Jim Meyering <[email protected]> • #4106
Re: fix xgethostname on OSX [patch]
Sun, 20 Feb 2005 07:11:43 -0800
"Mark D. Baushke" <[email protected]> • #4105
Re: Security Breach Alert - CVS Home File Download Area Compromised
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:42:26 -0500
Todd Denniston <[email protected]> • #4097
Re: Security Breach Alert - CVS Home File Download Area Compromised
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:54:03 +0100
"Arno Schuring" <[email protected]> • #4096
Re: Security Breach Alert - CVS Home File Download Area Compromised
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:30:35 -0500 (EST)
[email protected] (Larry Jones) • #4092
RE: Security Breach Alert - CVS Home File Download Area Compromised
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:23:09 -0800
"Conrad T. Pino" <[email protected]> • #4091
RE: Security Breach Alert - CVS Home File Download Area Compromised
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:45:31 -0800
"Conrad T. Pino" <[email protected]> • #4090
RE: Security Breach Alert - CVS Home File Download Area Compromised
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:37:38 -0800
"Conrad T. Pino" <[email protected]> • #4089
RE: Security Breach Alert - CVS Home File Download Area Compromised
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 14:26:52 -0800
"Conrad T. Pino" <[email protected]> • #4088
Security Breach Alert - CVS Home File Download Area Compromised
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 13:45:07 -0800
"Conrad T. Pino" <[email protected]> • #4087
Bilgi Portalý
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 05:56:55 +0200
"Moderator Adnan" <[email protected]> • #4086
RE: Questions about upgrading the server to the latest CVS versio n.
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:43:59 -0500
"Jim.Hyslop" <[email protected]> • #4085
Questions about upgrading the server to the latest CVS version.
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:21:45 +0200
"Limor Yaakov" <[email protected]> • #4084
Questions about upgrading the server to the latest CVS version.
Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:36:55 +0200
"Limor Yaakov" <[email protected]> • #4082
RE: windows build needs gethostname ?
Tue, 30 Nov 2004 20:26:40 -0800
"Conrad T. Pino" <[email protected]> • #4081
RE: windows build needs gethostname ?
Tue, 30 Nov 2004 20:16:39 -0800
"Conrad T. Pino" <[email protected]> • #4080
Re: windows build needs gethostname ?
Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:08:18 -0500
Derek Robert Price <[email protected]> • #4079
Re: windows build needs gethostname ?
Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:10:22 -0800
"Mark D. Baushke" <[email protected]> • #4077
regarding reserved checkout in wincvs
Sat, 20 Nov 2004 21:05:11 +0530
nallu ignacius <[email protected]> • #4076
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.