gmane.comp.web.html.general archive

388 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Embed manifest
Mon, 9 Jan 2012 22:38:17 +0000
David Dorward <[email protected]> • #8837
Re: Embed manifest
Mon, 9 Jan 2012 19:03:45 -0300
Juan Carlos Ojeda <[email protected]> • #8836
Re: Embed manifest
Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:55:06 +0000
David Woolley <[email protected]> • #8835
Re: Embed manifest
Mon, 9 Jan 2012 15:33:33 -0300
Juan Carlos Ojeda <[email protected]> • #8834
Re: Embed manifest
Sun, 8 Jan 2012 16:04:24 -0300
Juan Carlos Ojeda <[email protected]> • #8833
Re: Embed manifest
Sat, 7 Jan 2012 03:42:04 +0000 (UTC)
Ian Hickson <[email protected]> • #8832
Embed manifest
Thu, 5 Jan 2012 14:23:30 -0300
Juan Carlos Ojeda <[email protected]> • #8831
HTML 4.01: "Calculating the width of columns", first example
Mon, 5 Dec 2011 22:41:34 +0100
Christian Roth <[email protected]> • #8830
Re: Alignment Inheritance in HTML 4.01 Tables
Thu, 1 Dec 2011 13:02:39 +0100
Christian Roth <[email protected]> • #8829
Re: Alignment Inheritance in HTML 4.01 Tables
Thu, 01 Dec 2011 11:51:35 +0000
Philip TAYLOR <[email protected]> • #8828
Re: Alignment Inheritance in HTML 4.01 Tables
Thu, 01 Dec 2011 13:41:35 +0200
"Jukka K. Korpela" <[email protected]> • #8827
Re: Alignment Inheritance in HTML 4.01 Tables
Thu, 01 Dec 2011 11:09:12 +0000
Philip TAYLOR <[email protected]> • #8826
Re: Alignment Inheritance in HTML 4.01 Tables
Thu, 1 Dec 2011 11:49:03 +0100
Christian Roth <[email protected]> • #8825
Re: Alignment Inheritance in HTML 4.01 Tables
Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:00:15 +0000
Philip TAYLOR <[email protected]> • #8824
Re: Alignment Inheritance in HTML 4.01 Tables
Thu, 1 Dec 2011 00:43:10 +0000 (UTC)
Ian Hickson <[email protected]> • #8823
Re: Alignment Inheritance in HTML 4.01 Tables
Thu, 1 Dec 2011 00:43:03 +0100
Christian Roth <[email protected]> • #8822
Re: html5 input speech x-webkit -speech
Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:14:31 -0500
Arthur Clyne <[email protected]> • #8821
Re: Unstyled Content (was Re: Draft suggestion: "normal" needed)
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:44:02 -0400
Mark Linut <[email protected]> • #8820
Re: html5 input speech x-webkit -speech
Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:40:36 -0400
Sidney San Martín <[email protected]> • #8819
html5 input speech x-webkit -speech
Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:38:32 -0300
Bernardo Reis <[email protected]> • #8818
Re: Compatibility: Referencing Style Elements when serving as XML
Tue, 2 Aug 2011 23:16:30 +0000 (UTC)
Ian Hickson <[email protected]> • #8817
Re: Markup for variable definitions
Mon, 18 Jul 2011 20:19:15 -0400
Jim Jewett <[email protected]> • #8816
Re: Markup for variable definitions
Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:51:43 +0100
David Woolley <[email protected]> • #8815
Re: Markup for variable definitions
Mon, 18 Jul 2011 22:08:11 +0300
"Jukka K. Korpela" <[email protected]> • #8814
Markup for variable definitions
Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:49:39 +0200
Křištof Želechovski <[email protected]> • #8813
Re: Supported HTML markup standards
Fri, 1 Jul 2011 10:27:57 +0100
David Dorward <[email protected]> • #8812
Supported HTML markup standards
Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:35:03 +0100
"Johnson, Tom" <[email protected]> • #8811
hello Friends:
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:10:51 +0800
Tobias <[email protected]> • #8810
Re: Link Relationship for Moving Down a Hierarchy
Tue, 21 Jun 2011 01:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
maribel jones <[email protected]> • #8809
Are you taking on new clients?
Tue, 7 Jun 2011 14:10:03 -0400
"Lorenzo De Tomasi" <[email protected]> • #8808
Si compras en feria, ¡te llevas la cocina!
Sun, 29 May 2011 10:50:08 -0400
"Crisfer Inmobiliaria" <[email protected]> • #8807
Re: <none>
Wed, 18 May 2011 16:45:34 +0100
"Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd)" <[email protected]> • #8806
<none>
Wed, 18 May 2011 08:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
Jonathan Worent <[email protected]> • #8805
Re: Compatibility: Referencing Style Elements when serving as XML
Sat, 7 May 2011 20:55:18 -0400
Luis Marsano <[email protected]> • #8804
Re: Compatibility: Referencing Style Elements when serving as XML
Wed, 4 May 2011 18:35:04 +0000 (UTC)
Ian Hickson <[email protected]> • #8803
Compatibility: Referencing Style Elements when serving as XML
Tue, 3 May 2011 01:27:35 -0400
Luis Marsano <[email protected]> • #8802
for particioation
Sat, 30 Apr 2011 14:09:19 +0530
taha quadri <[email protected]> • #8801
Participating in the development of the HTML standard
Thu, 7 Apr 2011 17:43:27 +0000 (UTC)
Ian Hickson <[email protected]> • #8800
Re: [html] Elements within "title"?
Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:09:20 -0300
"Acompanhantes Curitiba" <[email protected]> • #8799
Paola Salviato wants to stay in touch on LinkedIn
Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:28:46 +0000 (UTC)
Paola Salviato <[email protected]> • #8798
Re: Link Relationship for Moving Down a Hierarchy
Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:41:04 +0000 (UTC)
Ian Hickson <[email protected]> • #8797
Re: Link Relationship for Moving Down a Hierarchy
Mon, 17 Jan 2011 07:44:01 +0000
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <[email protected]> • #8796
Re: Link Relationship for Moving Down a Hierarchy
Sun, 16 Jan 2011 13:45:59 +0100
Julian Reschke <[email protected]> • #8795
Re: Link Relationship for Moving Down a Hierarchy
Sun, 16 Jan 2011 12:25:03 +0000
"Sean B. Palmer" <[email protected]> • #8794
Re: Link Relationship for Moving Down a Hierarchy
Sun, 16 Jan 2011 11:00:49 +0000
David Woolley <[email protected]> • #8793
Re: Link Relationship for Moving Down a Hierarchy
Sun, 16 Jan 2011 00:11:39 +0000 (UTC)
Ian Hickson <[email protected]> • #8792
Re: Link Relationship for Moving Down a Hierarchy
Sat, 15 Jan 2011 15:54:57 +0000
"Sean B. Palmer" <[email protected]> • #8791
Re: Link Relationship for Moving Down a Hierarchy
Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:33:23 +0100
Julian Reschke <[email protected]> • #8790
Link Relationship for Moving Down a Hierarchy
Sat, 15 Jan 2011 15:03:55 +0000
"Sean B. Palmer" <[email protected]> • #8789
Re: Suggestion: 'rel="unrelated"' (was: Re: rel="nofollow" attribute)
Tue, 11 Jan 2011 23:48:28 -0800
"Jens O. Meiert" <[email protected]> • #8788
Re: Suggestion: 'rel="unrelated"' (was: Re: rel="nofollow" attribute)
Sun, 2 Jan 2011 20:10:19 -0500
"Joseph Cannizzo" <[email protected]> • #8787
1st CFP: IJCAI-11 Workshop on Discovering Meaning On the Go in Large & Heterogeneous Data (LHD-11)
Sat, 18 Dec 2010 00:48:21 +0000
Michael Chan <[email protected]> • #8786
Document Bug in XHTML 1.0 - 5.1
Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:22:37 +0800
Winfred Qin <[email protected]> • #8785
Re: [html] Elements within "title"?
Mon, 6 Sep 2010 20:26:48 -0300
"Rodrigo Buchner " <[email protected]> • #8784
Re: bidi embedding for block-level elements
Thu, 12 Aug 2010 05:23:11 +0000 (UTC)
Ian Hickson <[email protected]> • #8783
Re: Possible Inconsistency in HTML 4.01 Spec
Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:59:20 -0400
Aryeh Gregor <[email protected]> • #8782
Possible Inconsistency in HTML 4.01 Spec
Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:27:02 -0400
[email protected] • #8781
Re: accept attribute on file input should allow in-browser upload
Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:39:31 +0000 (UTC)
Ian Hickson <[email protected]> • #8780
Re: bidi embedding for block-level
Sun, 25 Jul 2010 20:13:58 -0700
Asmus Freytag <[email protected]> • #8779
Re: bidi embedding for block-level
Sun, 25 Jul 2010 22:36:19 -0400
CE Whitehead <[email protected]> • #8778
Re: bidi embedding for block-level elements
Fri, 23 Jul 2010 22:25:54 -0700
Asmus Freytag <[email protected]> • #8777
Re: bidi embedding for block-level elements
Sat, 24 Jul 2010 00:51:27 -0400
Boris Zbarsky <[email protected]> • #8776
Re: bidi embedding for block-level elements
Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:41:55 -0700
Asmus Freytag <[email protected]> • #8775
Re: bidi embedding for block-level elements
Fri, 23 Jul 2010 22:14:51 -0400
Boris Zbarsky <[email protected]> • #8774
Re: bidi embedding for block-level elements
Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:31:52 -0700
"Tab Atkins Jr." <[email protected]> • #8773
Re: bidi embedding for block-level elements
Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:37:32 -0700
Asmus Freytag <[email protected]> • #8772
Re: bidi embedding for block-level elements
Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:14:31 -0700
Asmus Freytag <[email protected]> • #8771
Re: bidi embedding for block-level elements
Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:52:08 -0700
fantasai <[email protected]> • #8770
Re: bidi embedding for block-level elements
Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:44:08 -0700
"L. David Baron" <[email protected]> • #8769
Re: bidi embedding for block-level elements
Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:16:47 -0700
Asmus Freytag <[email protected]> • #8768
Re: bidi embedding for block-level elements
Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:42:41 -0700
fantasai <[email protected]> • #8767
Re: bidi embedding for block-level elements
Fri, 23 Jul 2010 20:35:36 +0000 (UTC)
Ian Hickson <[email protected]> • #8766
Re: Embedding video.ogg file into HTML4?
Thu, 15 Jul 2010 06:50:49 +0100
David Woolley <[email protected]> • #8765
Embedding video.ogg file into HTML4?
Wed, 14 Jul 2010 21:24:53 +0200
Paul Chany <[email protected]> • #8764
Re: [html] Elements within "title"?
Wed, 9 Jun 2010 23:58:17 -0700
"Jens O. Meiert" <[email protected]> • #8763
Re: [html] Elements within "title"?
Wed, 9 Jun 2010 15:42:36 -0300
"Edmar Ferreira" <[email protected]> • #8762
Re: 'Age' for webpages
Tue, 8 Jun 2010 18:20:29 -0400
Aryeh Gregor <[email protected]> • #8761
Re: 'Age' for webpages
Tue, 08 Jun 2010 07:09:55 +0200
Julian Reschke <[email protected]> • #8760
Re: 'Age' for webpages
Mon, 7 Jun 2010 16:09:30 -0400
Aryeh Gregor <[email protected]> • #8759
Re: 'Age' for webpages
Mon, 7 Jun 2010 06:11:56 +0000
Merin Tresa Willy <[email protected]> • #8758
Re: 'Age' for webpages
Mon, 07 Jun 2010 08:27:01 +0100
David Woolley <[email protected]> • #8757
Re: 'Age' for webpages
Fri, 4 Jun 2010 17:05:03 -0400
Aryeh Gregor <[email protected]> • #8756
Re: 'Age' for webpages
Fri, 04 Jun 2010 22:00:52 +0100
David Woolley <[email protected]> • #8755
'Age' for webpages
Fri, 4 Jun 2010 08:03:14 +0000
Merin Tresa Willy <[email protected]> • #8754
Subject: XHTMLT Modularization 1.1 - Second Edition Example
Wed, 5 May 2010 11:51:12 -0700
"Robert Leif" <[email protected]> • #8753
<none>
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:33:36 +0200
Gabriele Romanato <[email protected]> • #8752
Clarifying questions about M12n 1.1 PER
Sun, 18 Apr 2010 00:57:17 +0200
"Krzysztof Maczy?ski" <[email protected]> • #8751
Re: Computer languages in langage tag
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 19:16:53 +0000 (UTC)
Ian Hickson <[email protected]> • #8750
Re: Computer languages in langage tag
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:34:20 +0100
David Woolley <[email protected]> • #8749
Re: Computer languages in langage tag
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:40:52 +0200
Mariusz Gliwiński <[email protected]> • #8748
Re: Computer languages in langage tag
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:06:12 +0100
David Woolley <[email protected]> • #8747
Re: Computer languages in langage tag
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:53:07 +0200
Mariusz Gliwiński <[email protected]> • #8746
Re: Computer languages in langage tag
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:39:11 +0200
Mariusz Gliwiński <[email protected]> • #8745
Re: Computer languages in langage tag
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:27:07 +0100
David Woolley <[email protected]> • #8744
Computer languages in langage tag
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:24:44 +0200
Mariusz Gliwiński <[email protected]> • #8743
Online whitelist wildcard flag
Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:03:28 +0200
Grégoire Lhotellier <[email protected]> • #8742
"mail a new topic" - Futures for User Interface Specifications
Sat, 3 Apr 2010 23:04:07 EDT
[email protected] • #8741
accept attribute on file input should allow in-browser upload
Tue, 6 Apr 2010 19:16:05 -0500
Jeff Schiller <[email protected]> • #8740
Re: bidi embedding for block-level elements
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:33:42 -0700
fantasai <[email protected]> • #8739
Re: bidi embedding for block-level elements
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:01:09 +0000 (UTC)
Ian Hickson <[email protected]> • #8738
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.