gmane.comp.web.pyblosxom.user archive

1674 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 17). Latest articles →

comments plugin
Fri, 24 Dec 2010 13:19:30 +0100
Dieter Plaetinck <dieter-7FYLOmueu/[email protected]> • #2115
Re: webfront with Blosxom 1.5
Thu, 23 Dec 2010 16:08:39 -0600
Bill Purcell <[email protected]> • #2114
Re: categories vs tags
Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:58:51 -0500
will kahn-greene <[email protected]> • #2113
categories vs tags
Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:37:57 +0100
Dieter Plaetinck <dieter-7FYLOmueu/[email protected]> • #2112
Migrating Drupal to Pyblosxom
Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:14:03 +0100
Dieter Plaetinck <dieter-7FYLOmueu/[email protected]> • #2111
Re: webfront with Blosxom 1.5
Mon, 20 Dec 2010 00:22:20 -0600
Bill Purcell <[email protected]> • #2110
Re: webfront with Blosxom 1.5
Mon, 20 Dec 2010 00:19:38 -0500
Michael Goddard <[email protected]> • #2109
webfront with Blosxom 1.5
Sun, 19 Dec 2010 18:03:07 -0600
Bill Purcell <[email protected]> • #2108
Can pyblosxom do modular privacy with OpenID, sub-blogs, RSS customization and multilingual support?
Sun, 19 Dec 2010 11:55:59 +0100
Alexandre Santos <cymbaloum-FtFwD/[email protected]> • #2107
XLMRPC and 1.5 Rc
Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:23:05 -0800 (PST)
jakbop <[email protected]> • #2106
Re: base url includes SCRIPT_NAME, which contains too much stuff
Sun, 7 Nov 2010 16:05:29 +0100
Dieter Plaetinck <dieter-7FYLOmueu/[email protected]> • #2105
Re: base url includes SCRIPT_NAME, which contains too much stuff
Sun, 07 Nov 2010 09:59:07 -0500
will kahn-greene <[email protected]> • #2104
Re: base url includes SCRIPT_NAME, which contains too much stuff
Sun, 7 Nov 2010 15:54:03 +0100
Dieter Plaetinck <dieter-7FYLOmueu/[email protected]> • #2103
Re: showing source code in blog posts
Sat, 6 Nov 2010 22:05:12 +0100
Dieter Plaetinck <dieter-7FYLOmueu/[email protected]> • #2102
Re: showing source code in blog posts
Sat, 6 Nov 2010 10:20:37 +0100
Dieter Plaetinck <dieter-7FYLOmueu/[email protected]> • #2101
Re: base url includes SCRIPT_NAME, which contains too much stuff
Tue, 2 Nov 2010 14:58:17 +0100
Dieter Plaetinck <dieter-7FYLOmueu/[email protected]> • #2100
Re: base url includes SCRIPT_NAME, which contains too much stuff
Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:50:14 -0400
will kahn-greene <[email protected]> • #2099
base url includes SCRIPT_NAME, which contains too much stuff
Tue, 2 Nov 2010 14:25:31 +0100
Dieter Plaetinck <dieter-7FYLOmueu/[email protected]> • #2098
Re: showing source code in blog posts
Mon, 1 Nov 2010 22:53:01 +0100
Dieter Plaetinck <dieter-7FYLOmueu/[email protected]> • #2097
Re: hardcoding mtimes for stories in their metadata section
Mon, 1 Nov 2010 22:42:37 +0100
Dieter Plaetinck <dieter-7FYLOmueu/[email protected]> • #2096
Re: showing source code in blog posts
Mon, 1 Nov 2010 19:53:53 +0000
seanh <[email protected]> • #2095
Re: hardcoding mtimes for stories in their metadata section
Mon, 1 Nov 2010 19:49:23 +0000
seanh <[email protected]> • #2094
Re: showing source code in blog posts
Mon, 01 Nov 2010 12:35:39 -0400
will kahn-greene <[email protected]> • #2093
Re: showing source code in blog posts
Mon, 1 Nov 2010 10:35:10 -0500
Terry Brown <terry_n_brown-/[email protected]> • #2092
Re: hardcoding mtimes for stories in their metadata section
Mon, 1 Nov 2010 10:49:41 -0400
Tim Gray <tgray-kfNaf1zyJtt8UrSeD/[email protected]> • #2091
Re: hardcoding mtimes for stories in their metadata section
Mon, 1 Nov 2010 15:32:58 +0100
Dieter Plaetinck <dieter-7FYLOmueu/[email protected]> • #2090
Re: hardcoding mtimes for stories in their metadata section
Mon, 1 Nov 2010 10:21:14 -0400
Tim Gray <tgray-kfNaf1zyJtt8UrSeD/[email protected]> • #2089
Re: hardcoding mtimes for stories in their metadata section
Mon, 1 Nov 2010 15:11:52 +0100
Dieter Plaetinck <dieter-7FYLOmueu/[email protected]> • #2088
Re: hardcoding mtimes for stories in their metadata section
Mon, 1 Nov 2010 09:56:02 -0400
Tim Gray <tgray-kfNaf1zyJtt8UrSeD/[email protected]> • #2087
Re: hardcoding mtimes for stories in their metadata section
Mon, 1 Nov 2010 14:23:37 +0100
Dieter Plaetinck <dieter-7FYLOmueu/[email protected]> • #2086
Re: showing source code in blog posts
Mon, 1 Nov 2010 14:04:27 +0100
Dieter Plaetinck <dieter-7FYLOmueu/[email protected]> • #2085
Re: hardcoding mtimes for stories in their metadata section
Mon, 1 Nov 2010 08:55:41 -0400
Tim Gray <tgray-kfNaf1zyJtt8UrSeD/[email protected]> • #2084
Re: showing source code in blog posts
Mon, 01 Nov 2010 08:46:00 -0400
will kahn-greene <[email protected]> • #2083
Re: hardcoding mtimes for stories in their metadata section
Mon, 01 Nov 2010 08:41:37 -0400
will kahn-greene <[email protected]> • #2082
hardcoding mtimes for stories in their metadata section
Mon, 1 Nov 2010 12:13:26 +0100
Dieter Plaetinck <dieter-7FYLOmueu/[email protected]> • #2081
Re: showing source code in blog posts
Mon, 1 Nov 2010 10:50:58 +0100
Dieter Plaetinck <dieter-7FYLOmueu/[email protected]> • #2080
Re: showing source code in blog posts
Mon, 1 Nov 2010 10:10:51 +1100
Pete Goldsmith <[email protected]> • #2079
showing source code in blog posts
Sun, 31 Oct 2010 23:08:15 +0100
Dieter Plaetinck <dieter-7FYLOmueu/[email protected]> • #2078
Re: Tag Fail
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:31:06 -0400
will kahn-greene <[email protected]> • #2077
Re: Tag Fail
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:28:02 -0400
andrew fitting <[email protected]> • #2076
Re: Tag Fail
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:52:30 -0400
will kahn-greene <[email protected]> • #2075
Re: Tag Fail
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 03:17:09 -0400
andrew fitting <[email protected]> • #2074
Re: Tag Fail
Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:50:18 -0400
will kahn-greene <[email protected]> • #2073
Re: Tag Fail
Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:31:54 -0400
andrew fitting <[email protected]> • #2072
Re: Tag Fail
Tue, 12 Oct 2010 01:36:27 -0400 (EDT)
Asheesh Laroia <[email protected]> • #2071
Re: Tag Fail
Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:57:11 -0400
andrew fitting <[email protected]> • #2070
Re: Tag Fail
Sun, 10 Oct 2010 08:33:13 -0400
will kahn-greene <[email protected]> • #2069
Tag Fail
Sat, 9 Oct 2010 17:10:25 -0400
andrew fitting <[email protected]> • #2068
Re: pyblosxom 1.5rc2 released!
Tue, 5 Oct 2010 22:01:07 +0100
seanh <[email protected]> • #2067
Re: pyblosxom 1.5rc2 released!
Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:07:05 +0100
seanh <[email protected]> • #2066
Re: Spam on trackbacks (Was: 1.5 comment_draft_ext?)
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:54:45 -0400
Blake Winton <[email protected]> • #2065
<div class="blosxomComments">
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:13:29 -0400
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #2064
Spam on trackbacks (Was: 1.5 comment_draft_ext?)
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:07:34 -0400
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #2063
Re: Spam on trackbacks (Was: 1.5 comment_draft_ext?)
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:22:26 -0400
will kahn-greene <[email protected]> • #2062
1.5 comment_draft_ext?
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:42:58 -0400
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #2061
Re: 1.5 comment_draft_ext?
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:52:43 -0400
will kahn-greene <[email protected]> • #2060
Re: pyblosxom 1.5rc2 released!
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:40:22 -0400
will kahn-greene <[email protected]> • #2059
Re: pyblosxom 1.5rc2 released!
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 09:58:24 -0400
Blake Winton <[email protected]> • #2058
Re: pyblosxom 1.5rc2 released!
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 09:57:21 -0400
Tim Gray <tgray-kfNaf1zyJtt8UrSeD/[email protected]> • #2057
Re: pyblosxom 1.5rc2 released!
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 09:53:09 -0400
Tim Gray <tgray-kfNaf1zyJtt8UrSeD/[email protected]> • #2056
Re: pyblosxom 1.5rc2 released!
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 09:50:20 -0400 (EDT)
Asheesh Laroia <[email protected]> • #2055
Re: pyblosxom 1.5rc2 released!
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 09:48:33 -0400
will kahn-greene <[email protected]> • #2054
Re: pyblosxom 1.5rc2 released!
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 09:04:36 -0400 (EDT)
Asheesh Laroia <[email protected]> • #2053
Markdown plugin rewritten as cb_story
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 03:28:02 +0100
seanh <[email protected]> • #2052
Re: pyblosxom 1.5rc2 released!
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 01:15:04 +0000 (UTC)
Will Kahn-Greene <[email protected]> • #2051
Re: pyblosxom 1.5rc2 released!
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 01:07:26 +0100
seanh <[email protected]> • #2050
Re: pyblosxom 1.5rc2 released!
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:49:53 +0100
seanh <[email protected]> • #2049
Re: pyblosxom 1.5rc2 released!
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:39:42 +0100
seanh <[email protected]> • #2048
Re: tags.py problem
Sun, 29 Aug 2010 13:41:46 -0400
Tim Gray <tgray-kfNaf1zyJtt8UrSeD/[email protected]> • #2047
Re: tags.py problem
Sun, 29 Aug 2010 09:49:55 -0400
will kahn-greene <[email protected]> • #2046
tags.py problem
Sat, 28 Aug 2010 13:40:27 -0400
Tim Gray <tgray-kfNaf1zyJtt8UrSeD/[email protected]> • #2045
Re: pyblosxom 1.5rc2 released!
Mon, 09 Aug 2010 17:39:25 -0400
will kahn-greene <[email protected]> • #2044
Re: pyblosxom 1.5rc2 released!
Mon, 9 Aug 2010 22:43:09 +0200
Hauke Fath <[email protected]> • #2043
Re: [installation] pip install pyblosxom failed
Mon, 09 Aug 2010 10:33:27 -0400
will kahn-greene <[email protected]> • #2042
pyblosxom 1.5rc2 released!
Tue, 03 Aug 2010 11:05:43 -0400
will kahn-greene <[email protected]> • #2041
Re: [installation] pip install pyblosxom failed
Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:17:45 +0200
Frédéric Hébert <[email protected]> • #2040
Re: [installation] pip install pyblosxom failed
Sat, 24 Jul 2010 11:18:27 -0400
will kahn-greene <[email protected]> • #2039
[installation] pip install pyblosxom failed
Sat, 24 Jul 2010 15:30:57 +0200
Frédéric Hébert <[email protected]> • #2038
How to export Category index.html only title for Static Rendering
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:13:25 +0800
"Zoom.Quiet" <[email protected]> • #2037
New tumblelog plugin
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:29:11 +0000
chombee <[email protected]> • #2036
Re: Flavours and templates
Sat, 06 Feb 2010 11:54:39 -0500
will kahn-greene <[email protected]> • #2035
Re: Flavours and templates
Sat, 6 Feb 2010 12:46:24 +0000
Chris G <[email protected]> • #2034
Re: Flavours and templates
Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:06:36 -0500
will kahn-greene <[email protected]> • #2033
Re: No tags plugins are available - broken links
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:10:07 +0000
Chris G <[email protected]> • #2032
Re: No tags plugins are available - broken links
Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:04:08 -0500
will kahn-greene <[email protected]> • #2031
No tags plugins are available - broken links
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 15:50:43 +0000
Chris G <[email protected]> • #2030
Re: A simple question about ordering of posts
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:12:25 +0000
Chris G <[email protected]> • #2029
Re: A simple question about ordering of posts
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:42:22 -0500
will kahn-greene <[email protected]> • #2028
Re: A simple question about ordering of posts
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:20:10 +0000
chombee <[email protected]> • #2027
Re: A simple question about ordering of posts
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:14:50 -0500
will kahn-greene <[email protected]> • #2026
Re: A simple question about ordering of posts
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 22:47:37 +0000
Chris G <[email protected]> • #2025
Re: A simple question about ordering of posts
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 22:45:00 +0000
Chris G <[email protected]> • #2024
Re: A simple question about ordering of posts
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:56:01 -0500
will kahn-greene <[email protected]> • #2023
Re: A simple question about ordering of posts
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 21:50:09 +0000
chombee <[email protected]> • #2022
Re: A simple question about ordering of posts
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:10:22 -0500
will kahn-greene <[email protected]> • #2021
Re: A simple question about ordering of posts
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:17:08 -0500
will kahn-greene <[email protected]> • #2020
Re: A simple question about ordering of posts
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 19:04:24 +0000
Chris G <[email protected]> • #2019
Re: A simple question about ordering of posts
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:36:03 +0000
chombee <[email protected]> • #2018
Re: A simple question about ordering of posts
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 16:33:04 +0000
Chris G <[email protected]> • #2017
Re: A simple question about ordering of posts
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 16:19:10 +0000
Chris G <[email protected]> • #2016
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.