gmane.comp.web.voice archive
380 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →
Synthetic Media Community Group
Sun, 1 Mar 2020 07:19:37 +0000Comments on Semantic Interpretation for Speech Recognition (SISR) Version 1.0
Thu, 4 Aug 2016 01:09:36 -0400Re: Sources of the latest version (W3C Recommendation 1 September 2015)
Sat, 30 Jul 2016 21:19:19 +0200Re: Sources of the latest version (W3C Recommendation 1 September 2015)
Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:54 +0200Re: Sources of the latest version (W3C Recommendation 1 September 2015)
Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:53:20 +0900Why do the 04/2014 XML schemas use namespace http://www.w3.org/2005/07/scxml
Tue, 12 Jul 2016 19:32:10 +0200Sources of the latest version (W3C Recommendation 1 September 2015)
Tue, 12 Jul 2016 19:24:00 +0200new W3C Community Group on Voice Interaction
Thu, 9 Jun 2016 14:44:39 -04003rd Workshop on Engineering Interactive Systems with SCXML
Wed, 1 Jun 2016 11:24:11 +0200Re: Yet another testcase question
Wed, 11 May 2016 09:53:26 -0400Yet another testcase question
Tue, 10 May 2016 21:49:29 +0200Re: Namelist continued
Thu, 5 May 2016 13:12:33 -0700Re: Namelist continued
Thu, 5 May 2016 21:32:47 +0200Re: <none>
Wed, 4 May 2016 21:54:50 +0200Re: <none>
Tue, 3 May 2016 12:55:52 -0400<none>
Sun, 1 May 2016 23:02:14 +0200Upcoming Workshop on Engineering Interactive Systems with SCXML
Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:31:30 -0400pls.xsd schema not reflecting the recommendation
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 19:55:17 +0000Re: SCXML errata document published
Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:53:29 +0100Re: SCXML errata document published
Thu, 25 Feb 2016 10:04:27 +0100SCXML errata document published
Wed, 24 Feb 2016 17:58:39 -0500Re: scXML recommendation (http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/REC -scxml-20150901/) §3.12.1
Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:00:34 -0500scXML recommendation (http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/REC-scxml- 20150901/) §3.12.1
Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:00:46 +0000Re: Where is the "value expression language" used?
Wed, 13 Jan 2016 11:28:35 -0500Where is the "value expression language" used?
Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:17:46 +0100Re: An IDL for SCXML interpreters
Thu, 7 Jan 2016 00:36:21 +0100Re: [SCXML] Incorrect and invalid ecmascript condition in IR test 459
Tue, 29 Dec 2015 01:47:46 +0100Re: [SCXML] Incorrect and invalid ecmascript condition in IR test 459
Mon, 28 Dec 2015 21:06:20 +0100[SCXML] Incorrect and invalid ecmascript condition in IR test 459
Mon, 28 Dec 2015 17:18:28 +0100Fwd: SpeechTEK Call for Speakers is Open
Tue, 6 Oct 2015 21:21:04 -0700Re: ALL: Thoughts and thanks as the VBWG comes to a close REUNION?
Thu, 1 Oct 2015 00:01:14 +0900Re: ALL: Thoughts and thanks as the VBWG comes to a close REUNION?
Wed, 30 Sep 2015 10:54:29 -0400Re: ALL: Thoughts and thanks as the VBWG comes to a close
Wed, 30 Sep 2015 10:16:07 -0400RE: Thoughts and thanks as the VBWG comes to a close
Mon, 28 Sep 2015 23:19:26 -0700RE: ALL: Thoughts and thanks as the VBWG comes to a close REUNION?
Tue, 29 Sep 2015 17:22:58 +0000Re: ALL: Thoughts and thanks as the VBWG comes to a close REUNION?
Tue, 29 Sep 2015 23:20:20 +0900Re: ALL: Thoughts and thanks as the VBWG comes to a close REUNION?
Tue, 29 Sep 2015 07:08:06 -0700Re: ALL: Thoughts and thanks as the VBWG comes to a close REUNION?
Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:17:22 +0900RE: Thoughts and thanks as the VBWG comes to a close
Mon, 28 Sep 2015 19:34:16 +0000RE: Thoughts and thanks as the VBWG comes to a close
Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:40:44 +0000RE: ALL: Thoughts and thanks as the VBWG comes to a close REUNION?
Mon, 28 Sep 2015 14:00:09 -0400Re: ALL: Thoughts and thanks as the VBWG comes to a close REUNION?
Mon, 28 Sep 2015 08:24:07 -0700Re: ALL: Thoughts and thanks as the VBWG comes to a close
Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:47:56 -0400Re: Namelist continued
Sat, 26 Sep 2015 18:16:53 +0200Re: Namelist continued
Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:58:05 -0400ALL: Thoughts and thanks as the VBWG comes to a close
Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:26:24 -0400Re: Namelist continued
Sat, 26 Sep 2015 10:57:52 -0400Namelist continued
Sat, 26 Sep 2015 15:12:43 +0200Namelist parameter
Fri, 25 Sep 2015 15:42:12 +0200RE: SCXML 1.0 is now a Recommendation!
Tue, 1 Sep 2015 19:14:28 +0000RE: SCXML 1.0 is now a Recommendation!
Tue, 1 Sep 2015 14:34:14 +0000RE: SCXML 1.0 is now a Recommendation!
Tue, 1 Sep 2015 13:21:26 +0000SCXML 1.0 is now a Recommendation!
Tue, 1 Sep 2015 09:16:23 -0400Proceedings of the SCXML Workshop 2015 are available
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:37:08 +0200Re: ECMAScript specific IRP test278 has dynamic datamodel in txml
Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:27:26 -0400ECMAScript specific IRP test278 has dynamic datamodel in txml
Sun, 16 Aug 2015 22:44:25 +0000blackjack.xml visualization problem
Wed, 5 Aug 2015 09:29:11 +0200Re: UI for authoring SCXML documents
Fri, 31 Jul 2015 08:42:54 +0200RE: UI for authoring SCXML documents
Thu, 30 Jul 2015 23:33:50 +0000Re: UI for authoring SCXML documents
Thu, 30 Jul 2015 08:41:06 +0200RE: UI for authoring SCXML documents
Thu, 30 Jul 2015 01:38:58 +0000RE: UI for authoring SCXML documents
Wed, 29 Jul 2015 23:37:07 +0000Re: UI for authoring SCXML documents
Wed, 29 Jul 2015 18:50:05 -0400UI for authoring SCXML documents
Wed, 29 Jul 2015 02:09:20 +0000Re: Hidden anchors in SCXML specification - can I refer to them?
Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:38:47 -0400Hidden anchors in SCXML specification - can I refer to them?
Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:28:45 +0000Re: [SCXML] history state in parallel state
Wed, 15 Jul 2015 11:21:19 +0200Re: [SCXML] history state in parallel state
Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:51:48 +0200 (CEST)Re: [SCXML] history state in parallel state
Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:03:42 +0200Re: An IDL for SCXML interpreters
Wed, 15 Jul 2015 09:00:25 +0200Re: [SCXML] history state in parallel state
Wed, 15 Jul 2015 07:59:41 +0200[SCXML] history state in parallel state
Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:13:37 +0200Re: An IDL for SCXML interpreters
Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:38:13 -0400An IDL for SCXML interpreters
Fri, 3 Jul 2015 14:01:27 +0000SCXML2015 Workshop - Action Points towards W3C Community Reports
Fri, 3 Jul 2015 11:18:32 +0000call for chapters for book standards-based interfaces
Wed, 17 Jun 2015 11:41:54 -0400Re: Comments on the SCXML specification
Fri, 5 Jun 2015 20:44:20 +0200Comments on the SCXML specification
Wed, 03 Jun 2015 21:28:35 +0200SCXML is a W3C Proposed Recommendation
Mon, 4 May 2015 13:28:35 +0900RE: orphaned reference
Fri, 1 May 2015 15:03:34 +0000orphaned reference
Fri, 01 May 2015 12:19:23 +0200Second CFP: Engineering Interactive Systems with SCXML
Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:22:04 -0400CfP: Engineering Interactive Systems with SCXML
Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:33:14 -0400Re: [SCXML] Incorrect and incomplete test 330 for ecmascript
Thu, 12 Feb 2015 08:55:03 -0500Re: [SCXML] Incorrect and incomplete test 330 for ecmascript
Thu, 12 Feb 2015 13:34:31 +0100Re: [SCXML] Incorrect and incomplete test 330 for ecmascript
Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:40:03 +0100Re: [SCXML] Incorrect XPath expressions in IR tests 153 & 155
Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:06:18 +0100Re: [SCXML] Incorrect and incomplete test 330 for ecmascript
Thu, 12 Feb 2015 08:46:10 +0100[SCXML] Incorrect and incomplete test 330 for ecmascript
Wed, 11 Feb 2015 23:17:32 +0100Re: [SCXML] Incorrect XPath expressions in IR tests 153 & 155
Tue, 10 Feb 2015 01:12:30 +0100Re: [SCXML] Incorrect XPath expressions in IR tests 153 & 155
Tue, 10 Feb 2015 01:02:10 +0100Re: [SCXML] Incorrect XPath expressions in IR tests 153 & 155
Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:33:28 +0100Re: [SCXML] Incorrect XPath expressions in IR tests 153 & 155
Mon, 9 Feb 2015 23:38:00 +0100Re: [SCXML] Incorrect XPath expressions in IR tests 153 & 155
Mon, 09 Feb 2015 17:17:30 -0500Re: [SCXML] Incorrect XPath expressions in IR tests 153 & 155
Mon, 09 Feb 2015 22:20:18 +0100Re: [SCXML] Incorrect XPath expressions in IR tests 153 & 155
Mon, 9 Feb 2015 19:28:44 +0100Re: [SCXML] Incorrect XPath expressions in IR tests 153 & 155
Sun, 08 Feb 2015 18:19:17 -0500[SCXML] Incorrect XPath expressions in IR tests 153 & 155
Sun, 08 Feb 2015 23:22:42 +0100Re: test240.txml: Invalid target state in nested invoker
Tue, 25 Nov 2014 09:54:41 -0500test240.txml: Invalid target state in nested invoker
Tue, 25 Nov 2014 12:15:58 +0000
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.