gmane.comp.windows.devel.dotnet.advocacy archive

46 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 1). Latest articles →

Expiration of your subscription to the DOTNET-ADVOCACY list
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 06:00:02 -0700
"L-Soft list server at DevelopMentor (1.8e)" <[email protected]> • #46
.NET in CNET
Sat, 12 Oct 2002 00:02:36 +0200
Davide Marcato <[email protected]> • #45
Renewal of your subscription to the DOTNET-ADVOCACY list
Wed, 2 Oct 2002 06:00:02 -0700
"L-Soft list server at DevelopMentor (1.8e)" <[email protected]> • #44
ANN: Web Services DevCon Almost Closed to Registration
Wed, 25 Sep 2002 11:00:21 -0700
Chris Sells <[email protected]> • #43
ANN: Web Services DevCon Filling Fast
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 09:33:58 -0700
Chris Sells <[email protected]> • #42
Re: ANN: "Spend A Day With .NET" Coding Contest on 8/30/02
Mon, 19 Aug 2002 16:00:38 -0400
Sam Gentile <[email protected]> • #41
Re: ANN: "Spend A Day With .NET" Coding Contest on 8/30/02
Mon, 19 Aug 2002 21:51:09 +0200
"Thomas N. Schwarz" <[email protected]> • #40
Re: .NET vs. Java
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:20:10 -0500
"McClelland, Russ" <[email protected]> • #39
Re: .NET vs. Java
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 11:07:29 -0400
Mike Schinkel <[email protected]> • #38
Re: .NET vs. Java
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 09:21:02 -0500
"Schram, James" <[email protected]> • #37
Re: .NET vs. Java
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 09:08:01 -0500
"Schram, James" <[email protected]> • #36
Re: .NET vs. Java
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 08:41:51 -0500
"McClelland, Russ" <[email protected]> • #35
Re: .NET vs. Java
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 14:39:41 +0100
Andrew Stopford <[email protected]> • #34
.NET vs. Java
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 08:04:21 -0500
"Schram, James" <[email protected]> • #33
Re: ANN: "Spend A Day With .NET" Coding Contest on 8/30/02
Sun, 4 Aug 2002 08:05:12 -0700
Chris Sells <[email protected]> • #32
Re: ANN: "Spend A Day With .NET" Coding Contest on 8/30/02
Sun, 4 Aug 2002 17:31:42 +1000
Mitch Denny <[email protected]> • #31
ANN: "Spend A Day With .NET" Coding Contest on 8/30/02
Sat, 3 Aug 2002 18:33:46 -0700
Chris Sells <[email protected]> • #30
Re: Infoworld Special on VB Programmers moving to VB.Net
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 12:38:47 -0400
"Jeffrey A. Little" <[email protected]> • #29
Infoworld Special on VB Programmers moving to VB.Net
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 08:37:57 -0700
Adwait Ullal <[email protected]> • #28
Need volunteers to port Qt# to windows :-)
Fri, 26 Jul 2002 16:51:04 -0400
Adam Treat <[email protected]> • #27
Hi
Sat, 20 Jul 2002 10:13:40 -0400
Yvonne Singer <[email protected]> • #26
Thanks for all the great session ideas!
Tue, 2 Jul 2002 17:32:18 -0700
Chris Sells <[email protected]> • #25
Re: How can I find a good .Net consultant?
Tue, 2 Jul 2002 17:41:55 -0400
Mike Schinkel <[email protected]> • #24
How can I find a good .Net consultant?
Tue, 2 Jul 2002 15:18:56 -0500
"Wright, Warren" <[email protected]> • #23
Final call for web services sessions/speakers
Tue, 25 Jun 2002 19:06:02 -0700
Chris Sells <[email protected]> • #22
SPOUT: Object vs. XML
Sat, 22 Jun 2002 20:22:12 -0700
Chris Sells <[email protected]> • #21
Re: Cost of migrating to .Net
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 22:57:40 -0400
Sam Gentile <[email protected]> • #20
Microsoft Response to Gartner Report (was: "Re: Cost of migrating to .Net")
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 17:12:54 -0700
"Ari Bixhorn (Microsoft)" <[email protected]> • #19
Re: Cost of migrating to .Net
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 17:55:50 -0400
"Sills, Adam" <[email protected]> • #18
Re: Cost of migrating to .Net
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 14:14:18 -0700
"Brian G. Rice" <[email protected]> • #17
Re: Cost of migrating to .Net
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 15:04:08 -0600
Brad Wilson <[email protected]> • #16
Cost of migrating to .Net
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 17:02:03 -0400
Anthony Skipper <[email protected]> • #15
software library business model
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 13:23:00 -0700
john williams <[email protected]> • #14
Re: [DOTNET] Constructive criticisms of C# and .NET FW
Wed, 22 May 2002 14:04:05 -0700
Doug Ransom <[email protected]> • #13
Re: [DOTNET] Constructive criticisms of C# and .NET FW
Tue, 21 May 2002 20:31:43 -0600
Brad Wilson <[email protected]> • #12
Re: [DOTNET] Constructive criticisms of C# and .NET FW
Tue, 21 May 2002 15:02:47 -0700
Doug Ransom <[email protected]> • #11
Re: [DOTNET] Constructive criticisms of C# and .NET FW
Tue, 21 May 2002 14:33:42 -0700
Doug Ransom <[email protected]> • #10
Re: [DOTNET] Constructive criticisms of C# and .NET FW
Tue, 21 May 2002 13:50:39 -0700
Russ McClelland <[email protected]> • #9
ANN: Don Box's keynote at the Web Services DevCon now available!
Mon, 29 Apr 2002 18:04:39 -0500
Chris Sells <[email protected]> • #8
Report: Sun and Oracle Bribed Attorneys to Keep MS Lawsuit Alive - This is an outrage!
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:50:53 +0100
Andrew Stopford <[email protected]> • #7
Re: Report: Sun and Oracle Bribed Attorneys to Keep MS Lawsuit Alive - This is an outrage!
Tue, 9 Apr 2002 20:28:13 -0400
Sam Gentile <[email protected]> • #6
Re: Report: Sun and Oracle Bribed Attorneys to Keep MS Lawsuit Alive - This is an outrage!
Tue, 9 Apr 2002 08:02:46 -0700
Gunnar Skogsholm <[email protected]> • #5
Re: Report: Sun and Oracle Bribed Attorneys to Keep MS Lawsuit Alive - This is an outrage!
Mon, 8 Apr 2002 13:52:19 -0400
Eric Hill <[email protected]> • #4
Re: Report: Sun and Oracle Bribed Attorneys to Keep MS Lawsuit Alive - This is an outrage!
Mon, 8 Apr 2002 10:20:47 -0700
Joshua Allen <[email protected]> • #3
Re: Report: Sun and Oracle Bribed Attorneys to Keep MS Lawsuit Alive - This is an outrage!
Mon, 8 Apr 2002 10:29:15 -0400
"Sam R. Akhtar" <[email protected]> • #2
Report: Sun and Oracle Bribed Attorneys to Keep MS Lawsuit Alive - This is an outrage!
Sat, 6 Apr 2002 17:30:35 -0500
Sam Gentile <[email protected]> • #1
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.