gmane.comp.xfree86.forum archive
2860 archived articles, newest first (page 29 of 29). Latest articles →
Re: some XFree86 5.0 questions...
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:59:07 -0500Re: thoughts
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 19:12:49 +0100Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:58:24 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)Re: Future of X ?
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:56:59 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)Re: Future of X ?
20 Mar 2003 18:53:19 +0100Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 18:52:03 +0100Re: some XFree86 5.0 questions...
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:53:53 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)Re: Suggestion for XFree86
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:49:19 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)Re: Xr/Xc and SVG status (was: XFree86 5.0 TODO)
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 18:57:21 +0100Re: Xr/Xc and SVG status (was: XFree86 5.0 TODO)
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:43:51 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:42:29 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)Re: Suggestion for XFree86
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 18:32:35 +0100Re: some XFree86 5.0 questions...
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 18:25:24 +0100Re: some XFree86 5.0 questions...
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 09:23:07 -0800Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 09:16:42 -0800 (PST)Suggestion for XFree86
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 11:07:17 -0800Re: some XFree86 5.0 questions...
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:11:24 -0500Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Re: [XFree86] Invitation for public discussion about the future of X
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 16:55:00 +0000Re: thoughts
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 17:56:20 +0100Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 17:49:28 +0100Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 18:04:17 +0100Re: Re: [XFree86] Invitation for public discussion about the future of X
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 11:41:51 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)Re: thoughts
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 08:38:04 -0800Re: Re: [XFree86] Invitation for public discussion about the future of X
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 11:40:06 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)Re: Future of X ?
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 11:29:41 -0500Re: Keith Packard issue
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 11:29:39 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)Re: Re: [XFree86] Invitation for public discussion about the future of X
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 16:08:06 +0000Xr/Xc and SVG status (was: XFree86 5.0 TODO)
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 11:07:48 -0500Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 17:08:48 +0100Bugzilla Mails
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 17:03:26 +0100Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 16:54:14 +0100thoughts
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 09:45:18 -0600Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 16:30:21 +0100XFree86 5.0 TODO
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 07:20:01 -0800 (PST)Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 15:16:02 +0000Re: Re: [XFree86] Invitation for public discussion about the future of X
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 14:48:21 +0000Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 15:04:03 +0000Re: Keith Packard issue
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 15:53:32 +0100Re: Future of X ?
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 15:49:04 +0100Re: Future of X ?
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 14:49:41 +0000Future of X ?
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 15:34:40 +0100Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 15:21:24 +0100thank you david dawes!
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 09:11:05 -0500 (EST)Re: Keith Packard issue
20 Mar 2003 14:06:48 +0000Re: Keith Packard issue
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 09:01:24 -0500 (EST)some XFree86 5.0 questions...
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 14:41:53 +0100Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 13:12:41 +0000Keith Packard issue
20 Mar 2003 13:19:22 +0000Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 13:06:57 +0000Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 13:53:51 +0100Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:48:12 +0000Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:36:28 +0000Re: Re: [XFree86] Invitation for public discussion about the future of X
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:21:13 +0000Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:41:46 +0100Re: [XFree86] Invitation for public discussion about the future of X
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 11:37:34 +0000XFree86 5.0 TODO
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 09:57:25 +0000I wish Keith Packard luck
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 10:57:02 +0100 (MET)Mailing lists archives
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 11:57:25 +0600Invitation for public discussion about the future of X
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 00:10:31 -0500test
Wed, 19 Mar 2003 12:41:47 -0500
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.