gmane.games.bridge.laws archive

623 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 7). Latest articles →

Re: Making a bid that works really well because pd psyched
Mon, 30 Sep 2019 11:34:00 -0400
"Robert Frick" <[email protected]> • #67044
Re: Making a bid that works really well because pd psyched
Sun, 29 Sep 2019 14:40:51 -0400
Steve Willner <[email protected]> • #67043
Re: Making a bid that works really well because pd psyched
Sat, 21 Sep 2019 18:40:33 -0400
"Robert Frick" <[email protected]> • #67042
Re: Making a bid that works really well because pd psyched
Sat, 21 Sep 2019 14:05:18 -0400
Steve Willner <[email protected]> • #67041
Re: Making a bid that works really well because pd psyched
Thu, 19 Sep 2019 19:33:26 -0400
"Robert Frick" <[email protected]> • #67040
Re: Making a bid that works really well because pd psyched
Thu, 19 Sep 2019 18:16:44 -0400
Steve Willner <[email protected]> • #67039
Re: Making a bid that works really well because pd psyched
Thu, 19 Sep 2019 17:57:01 +0200
Jean-Pierre Rocafort <[email protected]> • #67038
Re: Making a bid that works really well because pd psyched
Thu, 19 Sep 2019 05:57:26 +0200
Olivier La Spada <[email protected]> • #67037
Making a bid that works really well because pd psyched
Wed, 18 Sep 2019 19:45:28 -0400
"Robert Frick" <[email protected]> • #67036
Re: pausing after a jump -- technically
Sun, 1 Sep 2019 14:52:01 -0400
Steve Willner <[email protected]> • #67035
pausing after a jump -- technically
Sun, 01 Sep 2019 12:56:34 -0400
"Robert Frick" <[email protected]> • #67034
USBF Appeal Write-Ups
Fri, 17 May 2019 12:46:34 -0400
Adam Wildavsky <[email protected]> • #67033
Re: bridge reason for hesitation?
Tue, 7 May 2019 11:53:59 +0200
Volker Walther <[email protected]> • #67032
Priorities for the WBF?
Tue, 7 May 2019 00:31:51 -0400
Adam Wildavsky <[email protected]> • #67031
Re: WBF Appeal Review Summaries
Mon, 6 May 2019 23:28:55 -0400
Adam Wildavsky <[email protected]> • #67030
Re: bridge reason for hesitation?
Mon, 06 May 2019 19:45:39 -0400
"Robert Frick" <[email protected]> • #67029
Re: bridge reason for hesitation?
Mon, 6 May 2019 17:18:27 -0400
Steve Willner <[email protected]> • #67028
Re: bridge reason for hesitation?
Mon, 6 May 2019 17:06:26 -0400
Steve Willner <[email protected]> • #67027
Re: bridge reason for hesitation?
Mon, 6 May 2019 23:03:15 +0200
Herman De Wael <[email protected]> • #67026
Re: WBF Appeal Review Summaries
Mon, 6 May 2019 22:56:08 +0200
Herman De Wael <[email protected]> • #67025
Re: bridge reason for hesitation?
Mon, 6 May 2019 15:22:56 -0400
Adam Wildavsky <[email protected]> • #67024
WBF Appeal Review Summaries
Mon, 6 May 2019 14:03:39 -0400
Adam Wildavsky <[email protected]> • #67023
Re: bridge reason for hesitation?
Mon, 6 May 2019 13:56:33 -0400
Adam Wildavsky <[email protected]> • #67022
Re: [BLML] Wanted: Alternate wording for Law 16Bb1(a)
Mon, 6 May 2019 13:43:31 -0400
Adam Wildavsky <[email protected]> • #67021
Re: bridge reason for hesitation?
Mon, 06 May 2019 13:22:18 -0400
"Robert Frick" <[email protected]> • #67020
Re: bridge reason for hesitation?
Mon, 6 May 2019 10:20:38 -0400
Steve Willner <[email protected]> • #67019
bridge reason for hesitation?
Mon, 6 May 2019 15:09:22 +0200
"Sven Pran" <[email protected]> • #67018
Re: bridge reason for hesitation?
Mon, 6 May 2019 11:17:34 +0200
Jean-Pierre Rocafort <[email protected]> • #67017
bridge reason for hesitation?
Mon, 6 May 2019 09:31:47 +0200
Herman De Wael <[email protected]> • #67016
ACBL Providence, Orlando, and Kansas City casebook comments published
Wed, 3 Apr 2019 11:26:11 -0600
Adam Wildavsky <[email protected]> • #67015
Re: Unable to ruff
Sun, 31 Mar 2019 00:01:44 +0100
Peter Smulders <[email protected]> • #67014
Re: Unable to ruff
Sat, 30 Mar 2019 13:22:12 -0400
"Robert Frick" <[email protected]> • #67013
Unable to ruff
Sat, 30 Mar 2019 14:20:09 +0100
Volker Walther <[email protected]> • #67012
Re: Peace be with you
Fri, 22 Mar 2019 17:47:24 +1300
Wayne Burrows <[email protected]> • #67011
Re: Peace be with you
Fri, 22 Mar 2019 03:27:25 +0000
Rick Nehmy <[email protected]> • #67010
Re: Peace be with you
Fri, 22 Mar 2019 13:53:09 +1100
"Tony Musgrove" <[email protected]> • #67009
Re: Peace be with you
Thu, 21 Mar 2019 20:13:04 -0400
Brian <[email protected]> • #67008
Re: Peace be with you
Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:10:00 +1100
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #67007
Re: Peace be with you
Thu, 21 Mar 2019 07:38:38 -0600
Adam Wildavsky <[email protected]> • #67006
Peace be with you
Thu, 21 Mar 2019 19:29:22 +1100
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #67005
Re: Flogging a dead horse
Wed, 13 Feb 2019 11:54:19 +0100
"Ton" <[email protected]> • #67004
Re: Flogging a dead horse
Wed, 13 Feb 2019 08:47:26 +0100
Herman De Wael <[email protected]> • #67003
Flogging a dead horse
Fri, 8 Feb 2019 18:39:36 +1100
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #67002
Re: equity
Fri, 8 Feb 2019 16:24:45 +1100
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #67001
Re: equity
Wed, 6 Feb 2019 16:59:40 -0500
Steve Willner <[email protected]> • #67000
Re: Declarer's OLOOT
Tue, 05 Feb 2019 19:45:55 -0500
"Robert Frick" <[email protected]> • #66999
Re: Declarer's OLOOT
Tue, 5 Feb 2019 13:43:29 -0800
<[email protected]> • #66998
Declarer's OLOOT
Tue, 05 Feb 2019 16:23:12 -0500
"Robert Frick" <[email protected]> • #66997
Fwd: equity
Tue, 5 Feb 2019 16:40:34 +1100
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #66996
Re: equity
Mon, 4 Feb 2019 21:40:07 -0500
Steve Willner <[email protected]> • #66995
study
Sun, 3 Feb 2019 23:27:57 +0100
Lana Lucic <[email protected]> • #66994
Re: equity
Sat, 2 Feb 2019 19:14:03 +0000
Roger Pewick <[email protected]> • #66993
Re: equity
Sat, 02 Feb 2019 11:17:34 -0500
"Robert Frick" <[email protected]> • #66992
Re: equity
Sat, 2 Feb 2019 00:10:53 +0100
Jean-Pierre Rocafort <[email protected]> • #66991
Re: equity
Fri, 1 Feb 2019 15:09:53 +0100
Volker Walther <[email protected]> • #66990
Re: equity
Thu, 31 Jan 2019 22:52:57 +0100
Jean-Pierre Rocafort <[email protected]> • #66989
Re: equity
Thu, 31 Jan 2019 19:44:08 +0000
Roger Pewick <[email protected]> • #66988
equity
Thu, 31 Jan 2019 17:53:32 +0100
Jean-Pierre Rocafort <[email protected]> • #66987
The WBF LC's Commentary on the 2017 Laws is online
Tue, 22 Jan 2019 07:18:38 +0100
Adam Wildavsky <[email protected]> • #66986
ACBL Casebooks page moved
Sun, 23 Dec 2018 10:40:42 -0500
Adam Wildavsky <[email protected]> • #66985
Re: [BLML] Victory Points for Swiss Matchpoint Pairs
Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:38:08 +0800
"Bill Kemp" <[email protected]> • #66984
Re: Can a legal non-alert be misinformation anyway?
Fri, 9 Nov 2018 09:02:24 -0500
Steve Willner <[email protected]> • #66983
Re: Can a legal non-alert be misinformation anyway?
Fri, 9 Nov 2018 13:44:36 +0100
Gordon Rainsford <[email protected]> • #66982
Re: Can a legal non-alert be misinformation anyway?
Fri, 9 Nov 2018 11:24:19 +0200
Eitan Levy <[email protected]> • #66981
Re: Can a legal non-alert be misinformation anyway?
Fri, 9 Nov 2018 11:42:55 +0200
Eitan Levy <[email protected]> • #66980
Re: Can a legal non-alert be misinformation anyway?
Fri, 9 Nov 2018 08:34:12 +0100
Herman De Wael <[email protected]> • #66979
Re: Can a legal non-alert be misinformation anyway?
Thu, 8 Nov 2018 17:07:30 -0500
Steve Willner <[email protected]> • #66978
Re: Exposed card prior to auction
Thu, 8 Nov 2018 08:09:47 -0800
Jeff Ford <[email protected]> • #66977
Re: Can a legal non-alert be misinformation anyway?
Thu, 8 Nov 2018 12:45:08 +0100
Herman De Wael <[email protected]> • #66976
Re: Can a legal non-alert be misinformation anyway?
Thu, 08 Nov 2018 11:19:19 +0100
Peter Smulders <[email protected]> • #66975
Re: Can a legal non-alert be misinformation anyway?
Thu, 8 Nov 2018 07:18:26 +0100
Herman De Wael <[email protected]> • #66974
Re: Can a legal non-alert be misinformation anyway?
Thu, 8 Nov 2018 15:16:54 +1100
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #66973
Re: Can a legal non-alert be misinformation anyway?
Wed, 7 Nov 2018 13:50:13 -0500
Steve Willner <[email protected]> • #66972
Re: Can a legal non-alert be misinformation anyway?
Wed, 7 Nov 2018 12:10:11 +0100
Herman De Wael <[email protected]> • #66971
Can a legal non-alert be misinformation anyway?
Wed, 7 Nov 2018 07:38:52 +0100
Herman De Wael <[email protected]> • #66970
Exposed card prior to auction
Tue, 06 Nov 2018 13:40:38 -0500
"Robert Frick" <[email protected]> • #66969
Re: Washington Appeal N9
Wed, 24 Oct 2018 11:44:12 -0400
Adam Wildavsky <[email protected]> • #66968
Re: Washington Appeal N9
Mon, 22 Oct 2018 10:28:06 +1100
Laurie Kelso <[email protected]> • #66967
Re: Washington Appeal N9
Sat, 20 Oct 2018 20:21:48 -0400
Steve Willner <[email protected]> • #66966
Re: Washington Appeal N9
Fri, 19 Oct 2018 09:23:49 -0700
Jeff Ford <[email protected]> • #66965
Re: Washington Appeal N9
Fri, 19 Oct 2018 12:20:48 -0400
Adam Wildavsky <[email protected]> • #66964
Washington Appeal N9
Thu, 18 Oct 2018 14:58:42 -0700
Jeff Ford <[email protected]> • #66963
Re: Washington 2016 and Toronto 2017 NABC Appeals Casebooks with commentary posted
Tue, 16 Oct 2018 14:19:31 -0400
Adam Wildavsky <[email protected]> • #66962
Re: Washington 2016 and Toronto 2017 NABC Appeals Casebooks with commentary posted
Tue, 16 Oct 2018 14:19:02 -0400
Adam Wildavsky <[email protected]> • #66961
Washington 2016 and Toronto 2017 NABC Appeals Casebooks with commentary posted
Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:32:29 -0400
Adam Wildavsky <[email protected]> • #66960
Re: lack of explanation of convention
Thu, 4 Oct 2018 21:54:03 -0400
Adam Wildavsky <[email protected]> • #66959
Re: lack of explanation of convention
Thu, 4 Oct 2018 16:33:46 +0800
"Bill Kemp" <[email protected]> • #66958
Re: lack of explanation of convention
Wed, 3 Oct 2018 23:41:45 -0500
BridgeinIndia <[email protected]> • #66957
Re: lack of explanation of convention
Wed, 3 Oct 2018 10:06:59 -0400
Steve Willner <[email protected]> • #66956
Re: lack of explanation of convention
Wed, 3 Oct 2018 02:18:54 +0200 (CEST)
Herman De Wael <[email protected]> • #66955
Re: lack of explanation of convention
Wed, 3 Oct 2018 00:16:13 +0200
Jean-Pierre Rocafort <[email protected]> • #66954
lack of explanation of convention
Tue, 2 Oct 2018 12:41:28 -0500
BridgeinIndia <[email protected]> • #66953
Re: Helpless subscriber
Tue, 2 Oct 2018 12:14:54 -0400
Adam Wildavsky <[email protected]> • #66952
Helpless subscriber
Mon, 1 Oct 2018 14:26:41 +0000 (UTC)
PO Sundelin <[email protected]> • #66951
Re: Fielding an error ?
Sat, 29 Sep 2018 12:02:02 -0400
Steve Willner <[email protected]> • #66950
Re: Fielding an error ?
Sat, 29 Sep 2018 11:47:40 +1200
Wayne Burrows <[email protected]> • #66949
Re: Fielding an error ?
Thu, 20 Sep 2018 17:57:45 -0400
Steve Willner <[email protected]> • #66948
Re: Fielding an error ?
Wed, 19 Sep 2018 12:01:48 -0400
Steve Willner <[email protected]> • #66947
Re: Law 25B1: Between 25A and 31
Mon, 17 Sep 2018 11:16:16 +0200 (CEST)
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #66946
Re: Law 25B1: Between 25A and 31. The correct ruling
Sun, 16 Sep 2018 16:36:38 +0200
"Sven Pran" <[email protected]> • #66945
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.