gmane.games.devel.general archive

361 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →

[SPAM] Re: gorgeous
Sat, 27 Aug 2016 18:54:03 +0300
jkoenen <[email protected]> • #1840
Re: Sliding port NATs
Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:38:28 -0800
Jason Morales <[email protected]> • #1839
Re: Sliding port NATs
Tue, 09 Dec 2008 13:43:08 -0800
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1838
Re: Sliding port NATs
Tue, 9 Dec 2008 21:43:52 +0100
Alen Ladavac <[email protected]> • #1837
Sliding port NATs
Tue, 9 Dec 2008 10:24:18 +0100
Alen Ladavac <[email protected]> • #1836
Re: A DirectInput problem
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 09:42:52 +0200
"Pierre Terdiman" <[email protected]> • #1835
Re: A DirectInput problem
Tue, 8 Jul 2008 10:31:07 +0100
"Chris Chapman" <[email protected]> • #1834
Re: A DirectInput problem
Tue, 8 Jul 2008 08:24:57 +0200
Alen Ladavac <[email protected]> • #1833
Re: A DirectInput problem
Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:08:39 +0200
Xavier Bouchoux <[email protected]> • #1832
Re: A DirectInput problem
Mon, 7 Jul 2008 16:53:59 +0200
Alen Ladavac <[email protected]> • #1831
Re: A DirectInput problem
Mon, 7 Jul 2008 15:50:14 +0200
"Pierre Terdiman" <[email protected]> • #1830
Re: A DirectInput problem
Mon, 7 Jul 2008 15:31:17 +0200
"Pierre Terdiman" <[email protected]> • #1829
Re: A DirectInput problem
Mon, 7 Jul 2008 12:59:58 +0200
Alen Ladavac <[email protected]> • #1828
A DirectInput problem
Mon, 7 Jul 2008 10:51:35 +0200
"Pierre Terdiman" <[email protected]> • #1827
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created
Wed, 28 May 2008 10:32:26 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1826
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created
Wed, 28 May 2008 17:32:36 +0100
"Crosbie Fitch" <[email protected]> • #1825
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created
Wed, 28 May 2008 13:05:07 +0100
"Crosbie Fitch" <[email protected]> • #1824
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created conte nt providers, beware!
Tue, 27 May 2008 14:42:49 -0700
Tom Hubina <[email protected]> • #1823
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created conte nt providers, beware!
Tue, 27 May 2008 15:29:09 -0500
"Bob" <[email protected]> • #1822
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created
Tue, 27 May 2008 12:46:13 -0700
George Warner <[email protected]> • #1821
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created conte nt providers, beware!
Tue, 27 May 2008 20:28:37 +0100
"Crosbie Fitch" <[email protected]> • #1820
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created
Tue, 27 May 2008 13:44:36 -0500
"Bob" <[email protected]> • #1819
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created
Tue, 27 May 2008 19:33:12 +0100
"Crosbie Fitch" <[email protected]> • #1818
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created conte nt providers, beware!
Tue, 27 May 2008 10:25:49 -0700
Tom Hubina <[email protected]> • #1817
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created
Tue, 27 May 2008 12:24:54 -0500
"Bob" <[email protected]> • #1816
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created
Tue, 27 May 2008 18:01:24 +0100
"Crosbie Fitch" <[email protected]> • #1815
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created conte nt providers, beware!
Tue, 27 May 2008 09:56:08 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1814
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created
Tue, 27 May 2008 09:45:14 -0700
George Warner <[email protected]> • #1813
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created conte nt providers, beware!
Tue, 27 May 2008 17:24:13 +0100
"Crosbie Fitch" <[email protected]> • #1812
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created conte nt providers, beware!
Tue, 27 May 2008 10:29:23 -0500
"Bob" <[email protected]> • #1811
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created conte nt providers, beware!
Tue, 27 May 2008 12:22:11 +0100
"Crosbie Fitch" <[email protected]> • #1810
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created conte nt providers, beware!
Tue, 27 May 2008 10:42:55 +0100
"Crosbie Fitch" <[email protected]> • #1809
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created conte nt providers, beware!
Tue, 27 May 2008 03:46:56 -0500
"Troy Gilbert" <[email protected]> • #1808
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created conte nt providers, beware!
Tue, 27 May 2008 09:28:42 +0100
"Crosbie Fitch" <[email protected]> • #1807
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created conte nt providers, beware!
Mon, 26 May 2008 18:32:28 -0500
"Bob" <[email protected]> • #1806
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created conte nt providers, beware!
Mon, 26 May 2008 15:11:59 -0500
"Bob" <[email protected]> • #1805
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created conte nt providers, beware!
Mon, 26 May 2008 12:47:42 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1804
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created conte nt providers, beware!
Mon, 26 May 2008 12:34:07 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1803
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created conte nt providers, beware!
Mon, 26 May 2008 12:31:17 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1802
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created content providers, beware!
Sun, 25 May 2008 12:07:21 -0500
"Troy Gilbert" <[email protected]> • #1801
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created content providers, beware!
Sun, 25 May 2008 12:46:33 -0400
"Mike Shaver" <[email protected]> • #1800
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created content providers, beware!
Sun, 25 May 2008 11:41:40 -0500
"Bob" <[email protected]> • #1799
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created conte nt providers, beware!
Sun, 25 May 2008 12:17:58 -0400
"Mike Shaver" <[email protected]> • #1798
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created conte nt providers, beware!
Sun, 25 May 2008 10:59:18 -0500
"Bob" <[email protected]> • #1797
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created conte nt providers, beware!
Sun, 25 May 2008 10:40:34 +0100
"Crosbie Fitch" <[email protected]> • #1796
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created conte nt providers, beware!
Sat, 24 May 2008 23:03:39 -0500
"Bob" <[email protected]> • #1795
Re: Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created conte nt providers, beware!
Sun, 25 May 2008 01:05:24 +0100
"Crosbie Fitch" <[email protected]> • #1794
Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created content providers, beware!
Thu, 22 May 2008 12:21:21 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1793
CFP: 1st Lafayette Digital Entertainment Conference
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:19:26 -0500
Dirk Reiners <[email protected]> • #1792
Re: Pelvis transformation during animation
Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:14:45 -0800
"Nathan Martz" <[email protected]> • #1791
Re: Pelvis transformation during animation
Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:11:58 +0000
pontus birgersson <[email protected]> • #1790
Re: Pelvis transformation during animation
Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:57:04 -0800
"Nathan Martz" <[email protected]> • #1789
Pelvis transformation during animation
Wed, 14 Nov 2007 23:31:35 +0000
pontus birgersson <[email protected]> • #1788
Re: Infrastructure for Distributed Development
Sun, 21 Oct 2007 16:35:14 +0100
Jamie Fowlston <[email protected]> • #1787
Re: Infrastructure for Distributed Development
Sun, 21 Oct 2007 16:29:28 +0200
speedy <[email protected]> • #1786
Re: Infrastructure for Distributed Development
Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:10:24 +0100
Jamie Fowlston <[email protected]> • #1785
Re: Infrastructure for Distributed Development
Sat, 20 Oct 2007 10:52:04 -0500
"Dave Barrett" <[email protected]> • #1784
Infrastructure for Distributed Development
Sat, 20 Oct 2007 12:24:09 +0200
Chris Raine <[email protected]> • #1783
Re: Game data editor
Sun, 02 Sep 2007 18:52:03 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1782
Re: Game data editor
Mon, 3 Sep 2007 09:33:46 +1000
"Peter Suwara" <[email protected]> • #1781
Re: Game data editor
Sun, 02 Sep 2007 19:26:18 -0400
"Sylvain G. Vignaud" <[email protected]> • #1780
Re: Game data editor
Sun, 2 Sep 2007 22:42:32 -0700
"Ola Olsson" <[email protected]> • #1779
Re: Game data editor
Sun, 02 Sep 2007 12:12:25 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1778
Re: Game data editor
Sun, 2 Sep 2007 20:55:44 -0700
"Ola Olsson" <[email protected]> • #1777
Re: Game data editor
Sun, 02 Sep 2007 11:04:57 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1776
Re: Game data editor
Sun, 2 Sep 2007 18:26:32 +0800
"Research (GameBrains)" <[email protected]> • #1775
Game data editor
Sun, 2 Sep 2007 12:07:57 -0700
"Ola Olsson" <[email protected]> • #1774
Re: Photoshop CS3 question
Fri, 10 Aug 2007 01:45:43 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1773
Re: Photoshop CS3 question
Thu, 9 Aug 2007 15:54:56 -0500
"Troy Gilbert" <[email protected]> • #1772
Re: Photoshop CS3 question
Thu, 9 Aug 2007 22:31:39 +0200
"Daniel Renkel" <[email protected]> • #1771
Re: Photoshop CS3 question
Thu, 09 Aug 2007 00:25:15 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1770
Re: Photoshop CS3 question
Wed, 8 Aug 2007 15:23:38 -0500
"Troy Gilbert" <[email protected]> • #1769
Re: Photoshop CS3 question
Wed, 08 Aug 2007 13:17:32 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1768
Re: Photoshop CS3 question
Wed, 8 Aug 2007 15:10:04 -0500
"Troy Gilbert" <[email protected]> • #1767
Re: Photoshop CS3 question
Wed, 08 Aug 2007 12:33:23 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1766
Re: Photoshop CS3 question
Wed, 8 Aug 2007 11:04:51 +0100
"Richard Fabian" <[email protected]> • #1765
Re: Photoshop CS3 question
Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:02:12 +0200
"Daniel Renkel" <[email protected]> • #1764
Photoshop CS3 question
Tue, 07 Aug 2007 11:17:39 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1763
Re: Representable range mini-rant
Mon, 20 Nov 2006 19:40:27 -0800
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1762
Re: Representable range mini-rant
Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:38:33 +0200
"Thatcher Ulrich" <[email protected]> • #1761
Check This Out!
Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:34:24 -0500
"john smith" <[email protected]> • #1760
Check This Out!
Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:34:24 -0500
"john smith" <[email protected]> • #1759
Re: Assessing candidates when you don't have the skills
Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:46:02 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1758
Re: Assessing candidates when you don't have the skills
Mon, 23 Oct 2006 09:36:27 +0800
"Brett Bibby (Research)" <[email protected]> • #1757
Assessing candidates when you don't have the skills
Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:16:53 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1756
Re: Representable range mini-rant
Tue, 03 Oct 2006 19:28:36 -0600
"Andras Balogh" <[email protected]> • #1755
Representable range mini-rant
Tue, 03 Oct 2006 14:40:05 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1754
Re: Frame Capture
Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:52:32 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1753
Frame Capture
Fri, 1 Sep 2006 12:09:13 +0200
Gaël LEQUEUX <[email protected]> • #1752
Re: Data format for terrain
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:02:43 -0400
"Jim MacArthur" <[email protected]> • #1751
Re: Data format for terrain
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:50:53 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1750
Data format for terrain
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:16:44 +0200
"Michael Varlik" <[email protected]> • #1749
Re: Future trends for commercial game engines
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 10:58:56 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1748
Re: Future trends for commercial game engines
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:19:22 -0400
Kent Quirk <[email protected]> • #1747
Future trends for commercial game engines
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:06:28 -0500
"Ing. Jacobo Ríos" <[email protected]> • #1746
Future trends for commercial game engines
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:37:19 -0500
"jakovo _r" <[email protected]> • #1745
Re: API for enabling TV out ?
Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:02:52 -0700
"Ignacio Castano" <[email protected]> • #1744
Re: API for enabling TV out ?
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:44:21 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1743
Re: API for enabling TV out ?
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:21:32 +0100
Jason Rennie <[email protected]> • #1742
Re: cross platform 64bit lock free FIFO?
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:29:13 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1741
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.