gmane.ietf.imaa archive

349 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →

Closing this mailing list
Sat, 24 Jul 2004 17:58:43 -0700
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #903
Updating my address book
27 Jun 2004 19:58:23 -0000
"Wael Nasr" <[email protected]> • #902
Re: governance vs intergovernance
Tue, 08 Jun 2004 04:29:29 +0200
"J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <[email protected]> • #901
Re: governance vs intergovernance
Mon, 7 Jun 2004 20:56:51 -0400
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #900
Re: governance vs intergovernance
Mon, 7 Jun 2004 15:47:35 -0700
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #899
Re: governance vs intergovernance
Tue, 08 Jun 2004 00:31:16 +0200
"J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <[email protected]> • #898
Re: governance vs intergovernance
Mon, 07 Jun 2004 10:51:08 -0400
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #897
governance vs intergovernance
Mon, 07 Jun 2004 15:16:48 +0200
"J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <[email protected]> • #896
Re: WHY we need do "Divide the sequence into segments"
Mon, 07 Jun 2004 10:36:05 +0800
"dongxiaoli" <[email protected]> • #895
Re: WHY we need do "Divide the sequence into segments"
Sat, 5 Jun 2004 23:12:00 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #894
Re: WHY we need do "Divide the sequence into segments"
Fri, 04 Jun 2004 09:01:23 -0400
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #893
WHY we need do "Divide the sequence into segments"
Fri, 04 Jun 2004 17:15:50 +0800
"dongxiaoli" <[email protected]> • #892
Re: Why not use the same decode way for the LocalPart as the way for the Domain Name in the IDN
Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:33:07 +0800
"dongxiaoli" <[email protected]> • #891
Re: Why not use the same decode way for the LocalPart as the way for the Domain Name in the IDN
Sun, 18 Apr 2004 03:43:39 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #890
Re: Why not use the same decode way for the LocalPart as the way for the Domain Name in the IDN
Thu, 15 Apr 2004 07:27:59 -0700
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #889
Why not use the same decode way for the LocalPart as the way for the Domain Name in the IDN
Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:23:28 +0800
"dongxiaoli" <[email protected]> • #888
Re: Did someone have the tools
Sat, 27 Mar 2004 22:51:18 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #887
Did someone have the tools
Thu, 25 Mar 2004 17:19:32 +0800
"dongxiaoli" <[email protected]> • #886
closed issue [bidiDigits-18] (was: Re: Bidi: now I'm confused)
Sun, 21 Mar 2004 11:41:30 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #885
IDN-OSS Mailing List
Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:21:03 +1100
William Tan <[email protected]> • #884
A Model for proposals for I18N of email
Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:32:55 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #883
Re: Comments on draft-klensin-email-i18n-message-00.txt
Mon, 8 Mar 2004 11:18:21 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #882
Re: Comments on draft-klensin-email-i18n-message-00.txt
Fri, 05 Mar 2004 15:27:45 -0800 (PST)
[email protected] • #881
Re: Comments on draft-klensin-email-i18n-message-00.txt
Fri, 05 Mar 2004 14:51:51 -0800 (PST)
[email protected] • #880
Re: Comments on draft-klensin-email-i18n-message-00.txt
Fri, 05 Mar 2004 13:04:57 -0500
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #879
Comments on draft-klensin-email-i18n-message-00.txt
Fri, 5 Mar 2004 14:24:12 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #878
Re: jabber log from Monday's IEA BOF?
Thu, 04 Mar 2004 06:42:02 -0500
Tony Hansen <[email protected]> • #877
Re: jabber log from Monday's IEA BOF?
Wed, 03 Mar 2004 05:50:56 -0500
Tony Hansen <[email protected]> • #876
Re: jabber log from Monday's IEA BOF?
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 19:07:23 +0900
Yoshiro YONEYA <[email protected]> • #875
jabber log from Monday's IEA BOF?
Wed, 03 Mar 2004 03:37:59 -0500
Tony Hansen <[email protected]> • #874
IDN-OSS Alpha Plugin for IE
Tue, 02 Mar 2004 18:32:20 +1100
William Tan <[email protected]> • #873
jabber log of Yesterday's IEA BoF
Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:41:23 +0900
Yoshiro YONEYA <[email protected]> • #872
Re: Comments on and FWD: draft-klensin-emailaddr-i18n-02.txt
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:23:56 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #871
Re: Comments on and FWD: draft-klensin-emailaddr-i18n-02.txt
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:47:46 -0500
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #870
Re: Comments on and FWD:
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:38:32 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #869
Re: Comments on and FWD:
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 21:34:54 -0000
Charles Lindsey <[email protected]> • #868
Re: New draft, new idea
Fri, 06 Feb 2004 17:46:15 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #867
Re: New draft, new idea
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 07:34:22 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #866
Re: New draft, new idea
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 18:39:15 -0800
Grant Baillie <[email protected]> • #865
Re: New draft, new idea
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 16:28:55 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #864
Re: New draft, new idea
Thu, 05 Feb 2004 18:04:57 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #863
Re: New draft, new idea
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 13:19:37 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #862
Re: New draft, new idea
Thu, 05 Feb 2004 14:57:33 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #861
Re: New draft, new idea
Thu, 05 Feb 2004 14:45:57 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #860
Re: New draft, new idea
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 10:28:27 -0800
Grant Baillie <[email protected]> • #859
Re: New draft, new idea
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:46:58 -0500
[email protected] • #858
Re: New draft, new idea
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:47:18 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #857
Re: New draft, new idea
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:41:13 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #856
Re: New draft, new idea
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:23:03 -0800
Grant Baillie <[email protected]> • #855
Re: New draft, new idea
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 16:44:35 +0100
Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]> • #854
Re: New draft, new idea
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 08:22:22 -0700
Steve Hole <[email protected]> • #853
Re: New draft, new idea
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 00:05:30 -0500
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #852
New draft, new idea
Wed, 4 Feb 2004 16:58:24 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #851
Re: Comments on and FWD: I-DACTION:draft-klensin-emailaddr-i18n-02.txt
Mon, 02 Feb 2004 15:56:37 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #850
Comments on and FWD: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-emailaddr-i18n-02.txt
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:41:12 -0500
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #849
(unknown)
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:21:34 +0000
Paul Smith <[email protected]> • #848
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:08:32 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #847
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:45:44 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #846
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 21:35:42 -0500
"Hector Santos" <[email protected]> • #845
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 10:52:53 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #844
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 08:54:17 -0500
Nathaniel Borenstein <[email protected]> • #843
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 02:55:44 -0500
"Hector Santos" <[email protected]> • #842
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 01:36:00 -0500
"Hector Santos" <[email protected]> • #841
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 04:57:35 +0100
"J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <[email protected]> • #840
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt
Sun, 25 Jan 2004 20:00:18 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #839
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt
Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:47:25 -0800 (PST)
[email protected] • #838
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt
Sun, 25 Jan 2004 19:27:35 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #837
New mail-ng mailing list open for sign-ups
Sat, 24 Jan 2004 15:00:56 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #836
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 18:25:00 -0800 (PST)
[email protected] • #835
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 20:03:56 -0500
"Hector Santos" <[email protected]> • #834
FWD: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 16:53:33 -0500
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #833
Re: Agenda for Seoul BOF?
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 18:00:47 -0500
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #832
Agenda for Seoul BOF?
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 14:42:25 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #831
Re: 10646 & Unicode
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 01:15:44 +0800
James Seng <[email protected]> • #830
Re: 10646 & Unicode
Wed, 07 Jan 2004 17:19:48 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #829
Re: 10646 & Unicode
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 22:35:38 +0100
Keld Jørn Simonsen <[email protected]> • #828
RE: 10646 & Unicode
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:30:52 -0800
"Michel Suignard" <[email protected]> • #827
Re: if you really want utf-8 headers...
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 19:10:58 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #826
Re: if you really want utf-8 headers...
Tue, 06 Jan 2004 15:08:53 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #825
Re: 10646 & Unicode
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:01:25 -0800
"Mark Davis" <[email protected]> • #824
Re: 10646 & Unicode
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 18:27:15 +0100
Keld Jørn Simonsen <[email protected]> • #823
Re: 10646 & Unicode
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 07:27:59 -0800
"Mark Davis" <[email protected]> • #822
Re: 10646 & Unicode
Tue, 06 Jan 2004 08:29:11 -0500
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #821
Re: 10646 & Unicode
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:07:43 +0100
Keld Jørn Simonsen <[email protected]> • #820
Re: 10646 & Unicode
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:03:52 +0100
Keld Jørn Simonsen <[email protected]> • #819
RE: 10646 & Unicode
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:45:29 +0200
"Jony Rosenne" <[email protected]> • #818
Re: 10646 & Unicode
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 18:56:37 -0800
"Mark Davis" <[email protected]> • #817
Re: 10646 & Unicode
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 21:37:30 -0500
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #816
10646 & Unicode
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 01:15:01 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #815
Re: if you really want utf-8 headers...
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:29:14 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #814
Re: if you really want utf-8 headers...
Mon, 05 Jan 2004 15:10:33 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #813
Re: UUCP, etc., and SMTP/822/MIME mail (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-utf8headers-00.txt)
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 13:56:31 +0100
Keld Jørn Simonsen <[email protected]> • #812
Re: if you really want utf-8 headers...
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 07:05:30 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #811
Re: UUCP, etc., and SMTP/822/MIME mail (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-utf8headers-00.txt)
Sun, 4 Jan 2004 23:23:18 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #810
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-utf8headers-00.txt
Sun, 4 Jan 2004 23:16:53 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #809
Re: UUCP, etc., and SMTP/822/MIME mail (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-utf8headers-00.txt)
Sun, 04 Jan 2004 17:35:19 -0000
Charles Lindsey <[email protected]> • #808
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-utf8headers-00.txt
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 01:08:37 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #807
Re: First strawman for UTF-8 headers proposal
Sun, 4 Jan 2004 19:08:41 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #806
Re: First strawman for UTF-8 headers proposal
Sun, 04 Jan 2004 12:41:31 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #805
Re: UUCP, etc., and SMTP/822/MIME mail (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-utf8headers-00.txt)
Sun, 04 Jan 2004 11:08:56 -0500
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #804
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.